Cargando…

Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation

PURPOSE: To characterize the rate of rod-mediated sensitivity decline with age using a PC-driven cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor. To provide data regarding the repeatability of the technique. METHODS: Dark adaptation was monitored for 30 min following a minimum 30 % pigment bleach, using a white 1° s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patryas, Laura, Parry, Neil R. A., Carden, David, Baker, Daniel H., Kelly, Jeremiah M. F., Aslam, Tariq, Murray, Ian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23553287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2324-5
_version_ 1782273350582665216
author Patryas, Laura
Parry, Neil R. A.
Carden, David
Baker, Daniel H.
Kelly, Jeremiah M. F.
Aslam, Tariq
Murray, Ian J.
author_facet Patryas, Laura
Parry, Neil R. A.
Carden, David
Baker, Daniel H.
Kelly, Jeremiah M. F.
Aslam, Tariq
Murray, Ian J.
author_sort Patryas, Laura
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize the rate of rod-mediated sensitivity decline with age using a PC-driven cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor. To provide data regarding the repeatability of the technique. METHODS: Dark adaptation was monitored for 30 min following a minimum 30 % pigment bleach, using a white 1° stimulus (modulated at 1 Hz), presented 11° below fixation on a CRT monitor. Thirty-three subjects with no ocular pathology and normal fundus photographs were divided into two groups: older (≥45, n = 16) and younger (<45, n = 17). RESULTS: Rod recovery was assessed using component S2 of dark adaptation. S2 was significantly slower in the older (0.19 ± 0.03 log cd.m(−2).min(−1)) compared with the younger group (0.23 ± 0.03 log cd.m(−2).min(−1), t = −4.05, p < 0.0003), despite no difference in visual acuity and fundus appearance. Faster rates of S2 recovery were correlated with lower threshold at 30 min (T(30)) (r = −0.49). Correlation coefficients between first and second measurements for S2 and T(30) were 0.49 (p < 0.009) and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) respectively. The coefficient of repeatability was 0.07 log cd.m(−2).min(−1) for S2 and 0.35 log cd.m(−2) for T(30). The coefficients of variation for S2 and T(30) were 15 % and 10 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dark adaptation is slowed in normal ageing. CRT-based dark adaptometry is easily implemented and highly repeatable. The technique described in this article would be useful for documenting visual changes in future clinical trials assessing retinal health in the older eye with and without ocular pathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3682089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36820892013-06-14 Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation Patryas, Laura Parry, Neil R. A. Carden, David Baker, Daniel H. Kelly, Jeremiah M. F. Aslam, Tariq Murray, Ian J. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Medical Ophthalmology PURPOSE: To characterize the rate of rod-mediated sensitivity decline with age using a PC-driven cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor. To provide data regarding the repeatability of the technique. METHODS: Dark adaptation was monitored for 30 min following a minimum 30 % pigment bleach, using a white 1° stimulus (modulated at 1 Hz), presented 11° below fixation on a CRT monitor. Thirty-three subjects with no ocular pathology and normal fundus photographs were divided into two groups: older (≥45, n = 16) and younger (<45, n = 17). RESULTS: Rod recovery was assessed using component S2 of dark adaptation. S2 was significantly slower in the older (0.19 ± 0.03 log cd.m(−2).min(−1)) compared with the younger group (0.23 ± 0.03 log cd.m(−2).min(−1), t = −4.05, p < 0.0003), despite no difference in visual acuity and fundus appearance. Faster rates of S2 recovery were correlated with lower threshold at 30 min (T(30)) (r = −0.49). Correlation coefficients between first and second measurements for S2 and T(30) were 0.49 (p < 0.009) and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) respectively. The coefficient of repeatability was 0.07 log cd.m(−2).min(−1) for S2 and 0.35 log cd.m(−2) for T(30). The coefficients of variation for S2 and T(30) were 15 % and 10 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dark adaptation is slowed in normal ageing. CRT-based dark adaptometry is easily implemented and highly repeatable. The technique described in this article would be useful for documenting visual changes in future clinical trials assessing retinal health in the older eye with and without ocular pathology. Springer-Verlag 2013-04-05 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3682089/ /pubmed/23553287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2324-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Ophthalmology
Patryas, Laura
Parry, Neil R. A.
Carden, David
Baker, Daniel H.
Kelly, Jeremiah M. F.
Aslam, Tariq
Murray, Ian J.
Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
title Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
title_full Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
title_fullStr Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
title_short Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
title_sort assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation
topic Medical Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23553287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2324-5
work_keys_str_mv AT patryaslaura assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation
AT parryneilra assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation
AT cardendavid assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation
AT bakerdanielh assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation
AT kellyjeremiahmf assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation
AT aslamtariq assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation
AT murrayianj assessmentofagechangesandrepeatabilityforcomputerbasedroddarkadaptation