Cargando…

Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives

BACKGROUND: Most intrauterine contraception (IUC) placements do not require pain relief. However, small proportions of nulliparous (∼17%) and parous (∼11%) women experience substantial pain that needs to be proactively managed. This review critically evaluates the evidence for pain management strate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Mansour, D., Fiala, C., Kaunitz, A.M., Bahamondes, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt022
_version_ 1782273397163556864
author Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
Mansour, D.
Fiala, C.
Kaunitz, A.M.
Bahamondes, L.
author_facet Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
Mansour, D.
Fiala, C.
Kaunitz, A.M.
Bahamondes, L.
author_sort Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most intrauterine contraception (IUC) placements do not require pain relief. However, small proportions of nulliparous (∼17%) and parous (∼11%) women experience substantial pain that needs to be proactively managed. This review critically evaluates the evidence for pain management strategies, formulates evidence-based recommendations and identifies data gaps and areas for further research. METHODS: A PubMed literature search was undertaken. Relevant articles on management of pain associated with IUC insertion, published in English between 1980 and November 2012, were identified using the following search terms: ‘intrauterine contraception’, ‘insertion’ and ‘pain’. RCTs were included; further relevant articles were also identified and included as appropriate. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified and included: 12 RCTs and one non-randomized study of pre-insertion oral analgesia, cervical priming and local anaesthesia; one systematic review and one RCT on post-insertion analgesia and two non-randomized studies on non-pharmacological interventions. There was no conclusive evidence that any prophylactic pharmacological intervention reduces pain associated with IUC insertion. However, most of the regimens studied were adopted from hysteroscopy or abortion and effectiveness in specific subsets of women has not been studied adequately. A systematic review found non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID) to be effective in reactively treating post-insertion pain, but no benefit was found with prophylactic use. CONCLUSIONS: No prophylactic pharmacological intervention has been adequately evaluated to support routine use for pain reduction during or after IUC insertion. Women's anxiety about the procedure may contribute to higher levels of perceived pain, which highlights the importance of counselling, and creating a trustworthy, unhurried and professional atmosphere in which the experience of the provider also has a major role; a situation frequently referred to as ‘verbal anaesthesia’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3682672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36826722013-06-18 Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Mansour, D. Fiala, C. Kaunitz, A.M. Bahamondes, L. Hum Reprod Update Reviews BACKGROUND: Most intrauterine contraception (IUC) placements do not require pain relief. However, small proportions of nulliparous (∼17%) and parous (∼11%) women experience substantial pain that needs to be proactively managed. This review critically evaluates the evidence for pain management strategies, formulates evidence-based recommendations and identifies data gaps and areas for further research. METHODS: A PubMed literature search was undertaken. Relevant articles on management of pain associated with IUC insertion, published in English between 1980 and November 2012, were identified using the following search terms: ‘intrauterine contraception’, ‘insertion’ and ‘pain’. RCTs were included; further relevant articles were also identified and included as appropriate. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified and included: 12 RCTs and one non-randomized study of pre-insertion oral analgesia, cervical priming and local anaesthesia; one systematic review and one RCT on post-insertion analgesia and two non-randomized studies on non-pharmacological interventions. There was no conclusive evidence that any prophylactic pharmacological intervention reduces pain associated with IUC insertion. However, most of the regimens studied were adopted from hysteroscopy or abortion and effectiveness in specific subsets of women has not been studied adequately. A systematic review found non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID) to be effective in reactively treating post-insertion pain, but no benefit was found with prophylactic use. CONCLUSIONS: No prophylactic pharmacological intervention has been adequately evaluated to support routine use for pain reduction during or after IUC insertion. Women's anxiety about the procedure may contribute to higher levels of perceived pain, which highlights the importance of counselling, and creating a trustworthy, unhurried and professional atmosphere in which the experience of the provider also has a major role; a situation frequently referred to as ‘verbal anaesthesia’. Oxford University Press 2013-07 2013-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3682672/ /pubmed/23670222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt022 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reviews
Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
Mansour, D.
Fiala, C.
Kaunitz, A.M.
Bahamondes, L.
Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
title Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
title_full Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
title_fullStr Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
title_full_unstemmed Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
title_short Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
title_sort management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt022
work_keys_str_mv AT gemzelldanielssonk managementofpainassociatedwiththeinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptives
AT mansourd managementofpainassociatedwiththeinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptives
AT fialac managementofpainassociatedwiththeinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptives
AT kaunitzam managementofpainassociatedwiththeinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptives
AT bahamondesl managementofpainassociatedwiththeinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptives