Cargando…
A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses are particularly vulnerable to the effects of publication bias. Despite methodologists’ best efforts to locate all evidence for a given topic the most comprehensive searches are likely to miss unpublished studies and studies that are published in the gray literature only. I...
Autores principales: | Schmucker, Christine, Bluemle, Annette, Briel, Matthias, Portalupi, Susan, Lang, Britta, Motschall, Edith, Schwarzer, Guido, Bassler, Dirk, Mueller, Katharina F, von Elm, Erik, Meerpohl, Joerg J |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23634657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-24 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
por: Portalupi, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
por: Mueller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol
por: Briel, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Dissemination Bias in Systematic Reviews of Animal Research: A Systematic Review
por: Mueller, Katharina F., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research
por: Schmucker, Christine M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)