Cargando…

Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization

Subject-specific four-layer boundary element method (BEM) electrical forward head models for four participants, generated from magnetic resonance (MR) head images using NFT (www.sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/NFT), were used to simulate electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp potentials at 256 recorded electrode po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akalin Acar, Zeynep, Makeig, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23355112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0274-6
_version_ 1782273457624449024
author Akalin Acar, Zeynep
Makeig, Scott
author_facet Akalin Acar, Zeynep
Makeig, Scott
author_sort Akalin Acar, Zeynep
collection PubMed
description Subject-specific four-layer boundary element method (BEM) electrical forward head models for four participants, generated from magnetic resonance (MR) head images using NFT (www.sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/NFT), were used to simulate electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp potentials at 256 recorded electrode positions produced by single current dipoles of a 3-D grid in brain space. Locations of these dipoles were then estimated using gradient descent within five template head models fit to the electrode positions. These were: a spherical model, three-layer and four-layer BEM head models based on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template head image, and these BEM models warped to the recorded electrode positions. Smallest localization errors (4.1–6.2 mm, medians) were obtained using the electrode-position warped four-layer BEM models, with largest localization errors (~20 mm) for most basal brain locations. When we increased the brain-to-skull conductivity ratio assumed in the template model scalp projections from the simulated value (25:1) to a higher value (80:1) used in earlier studies, the estimated dipole locations moved outwards (12.4 mm, median). We also investigated the effects of errors in co-registering the electrode positions, of reducing electrode counts, and of adding a fifth, isotropic white matter layer to one individual head model. Results show that when individual subject MR head images are not available to construct subject-specific head models, accurate EEG source localization should employ a four- or five-layer BEM template head model incorporating an accurate skull conductivity estimate and warped to 64 or more accurately 3-D measured and co-registered electrode positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3683142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36831422013-06-19 Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization Akalin Acar, Zeynep Makeig, Scott Brain Topogr Original Paper Subject-specific four-layer boundary element method (BEM) electrical forward head models for four participants, generated from magnetic resonance (MR) head images using NFT (www.sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/NFT), were used to simulate electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp potentials at 256 recorded electrode positions produced by single current dipoles of a 3-D grid in brain space. Locations of these dipoles were then estimated using gradient descent within five template head models fit to the electrode positions. These were: a spherical model, three-layer and four-layer BEM head models based on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template head image, and these BEM models warped to the recorded electrode positions. Smallest localization errors (4.1–6.2 mm, medians) were obtained using the electrode-position warped four-layer BEM models, with largest localization errors (~20 mm) for most basal brain locations. When we increased the brain-to-skull conductivity ratio assumed in the template model scalp projections from the simulated value (25:1) to a higher value (80:1) used in earlier studies, the estimated dipole locations moved outwards (12.4 mm, median). We also investigated the effects of errors in co-registering the electrode positions, of reducing electrode counts, and of adding a fifth, isotropic white matter layer to one individual head model. Results show that when individual subject MR head images are not available to construct subject-specific head models, accurate EEG source localization should employ a four- or five-layer BEM template head model incorporating an accurate skull conductivity estimate and warped to 64 or more accurately 3-D measured and co-registered electrode positions. Springer US 2013-01-26 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3683142/ /pubmed/23355112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0274-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
spellingShingle Original Paper
Akalin Acar, Zeynep
Makeig, Scott
Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
title Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
title_full Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
title_fullStr Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
title_short Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
title_sort effects of forward model errors on eeg source localization
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23355112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0274-6
work_keys_str_mv AT akalinacarzeynep effectsofforwardmodelerrorsoneegsourcelocalization
AT makeigscott effectsofforwardmodelerrorsoneegsourcelocalization