Cargando…

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density

Osteoporosis is common disorder of elderly population all over the world as well as in India. The presence of osteoporosis predicts fracture risk. Fragility fracture has marked morbidity as well as mortality. Thus, osteoporosis has marked therapeutic and economic implications. Osteoporosis is define...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, M. K., Kharb, Sandeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776890
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.109659
_version_ 1782273468112306176
author Garg, M. K.
Kharb, Sandeep
author_facet Garg, M. K.
Kharb, Sandeep
author_sort Garg, M. K.
collection PubMed
description Osteoporosis is common disorder of elderly population all over the world as well as in India. The presence of osteoporosis predicts fracture risk. Fragility fracture has marked morbidity as well as mortality. Thus, osteoporosis has marked therapeutic and economic implications. Osteoporosis is defined by low bone mineral density (BMD). The gold-standard method to assess BMD is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In India, hologic and lunar machines are most commonly used to measure BMD; these machines have their own normative data from which patients BMD is compared and results are generated. As per recommendations, all postmenopausal women and men above 70 years need BMD estimation other than quite a few other specific indications as well. With increasing life expectancy, increased awareness of osteoporosis, and availability of DXA machines, there is flooding of requests for BMD estimation. In view of all this, it becomes imperative on part of physicians, orthopedicians, rheumatologists, and endocrinologists alike to be fully aware about pitfalls in BMD assessment by DXA and interpretation of BMD reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3683192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36831922013-06-17 Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density Garg, M. K. Kharb, Sandeep Indian J Endocrinol Metab Review Article Osteoporosis is common disorder of elderly population all over the world as well as in India. The presence of osteoporosis predicts fracture risk. Fragility fracture has marked morbidity as well as mortality. Thus, osteoporosis has marked therapeutic and economic implications. Osteoporosis is defined by low bone mineral density (BMD). The gold-standard method to assess BMD is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In India, hologic and lunar machines are most commonly used to measure BMD; these machines have their own normative data from which patients BMD is compared and results are generated. As per recommendations, all postmenopausal women and men above 70 years need BMD estimation other than quite a few other specific indications as well. With increasing life expectancy, increased awareness of osteoporosis, and availability of DXA machines, there is flooding of requests for BMD estimation. In view of all this, it becomes imperative on part of physicians, orthopedicians, rheumatologists, and endocrinologists alike to be fully aware about pitfalls in BMD assessment by DXA and interpretation of BMD reports. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3683192/ /pubmed/23776890 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.109659 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Garg, M. K.
Kharb, Sandeep
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
title Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
title_full Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
title_fullStr Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
title_full_unstemmed Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
title_short Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
title_sort dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776890
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.109659
work_keys_str_mv AT gargmk dualenergyxrayabsorptiometrypitfallsinmeasurementandinterpretationofbonemineraldensity
AT kharbsandeep dualenergyxrayabsorptiometrypitfallsinmeasurementandinterpretationofbonemineraldensity