Cargando…
Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central medias...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492 |
_version_ | 1782273493147058176 |
---|---|
author | Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Levy, Michael J. Van Domselaar, Manuel González-Panizo, Fernando Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel Juzgado-Lucas, Diego Albillos, Agustin |
author_facet | Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Levy, Michael J. Van Domselaar, Manuel González-Panizo, Fernando Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel Juzgado-Lucas, Diego Albillos, Agustin |
author_sort | Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3683425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36834252013-07-01 Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Levy, Michael J. Van Domselaar, Manuel González-Panizo, Fernando Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel Juzgado-Lucas, Diego Albillos, Agustin Diagn Ther Endosc Clinical Study Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3683425/ /pubmed/23818747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492 Text en Copyright © 2013 Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Levy, Michael J. Van Domselaar, Manuel González-Panizo, Fernando Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel Juzgado-Lucas, Diego Albillos, Agustin Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses |
title | Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses |
title_full | Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses |
title_short | Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses |
title_sort | diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazquezsequeirosenrique diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT levymichaelj diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT vandomselaarmanuel diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT gonzalezpanizofernando diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT forunyolcinajoseramon diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT boixedamiqueldaniel diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT juzgadolucasdiego diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses AT albillosagustin diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses |