Cargando…

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses

Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central medias...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique, Levy, Michael J., Van Domselaar, Manuel, González-Panizo, Fernando, Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon, Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel, Juzgado-Lucas, Diego, Albillos, Agustin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492
_version_ 1782273493147058176
author Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
Levy, Michael J.
Van Domselaar, Manuel
González-Panizo, Fernando
Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon
Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel
Juzgado-Lucas, Diego
Albillos, Agustin
author_facet Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
Levy, Michael J.
Van Domselaar, Manuel
González-Panizo, Fernando
Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon
Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel
Juzgado-Lucas, Diego
Albillos, Agustin
author_sort Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
collection PubMed
description Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3683425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36834252013-07-01 Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Levy, Michael J. Van Domselaar, Manuel González-Panizo, Fernando Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel Juzgado-Lucas, Diego Albillos, Agustin Diagn Ther Endosc Clinical Study Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3683425/ /pubmed/23818747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492 Text en Copyright © 2013 Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
Levy, Michael J.
Van Domselaar, Manuel
González-Panizo, Fernando
Foruny-Olcina, Jose Ramon
Boixeda-Miquel, Daniel
Juzgado-Lucas, Diego
Albillos, Agustin
Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
title Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
title_full Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
title_fullStr Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
title_short Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
title_sort diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezsequeirosenrique diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT levymichaelj diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT vandomselaarmanuel diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT gonzalezpanizofernando diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT forunyolcinajoseramon diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT boixedamiqueldaniel diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT juzgadolucasdiego diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses
AT albillosagustin diagnosticyieldandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationofcentralmediastinallungmasses