Cargando…

Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Although numerous trials of falls prevention interventions have been completed, there is extensive variation in their intervention components and clinical context, such that the key elements of an effective falls preve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tricco, Andrea C, Cogo, Elise, Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna, Sibley, Kathryn M, Feldman, Fabio, Kerr, Gillian, Majumdar, Sumit R, Jaglal, Susan, Straus, Sharon E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-38
_version_ 1782273514380722176
author Tricco, Andrea C
Cogo, Elise
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Sibley, Kathryn M
Feldman, Fabio
Kerr, Gillian
Majumdar, Sumit R
Jaglal, Susan
Straus, Sharon E
author_facet Tricco, Andrea C
Cogo, Elise
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Sibley, Kathryn M
Feldman, Fabio
Kerr, Gillian
Majumdar, Sumit R
Jaglal, Susan
Straus, Sharon E
author_sort Tricco, Andrea C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Although numerous trials of falls prevention interventions have been completed, there is extensive variation in their intervention components and clinical context, such that the key elements of an effective falls prevention program remain unclear to patients, clinicians, and policy-makers. Our objective is to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent falls though a systematic review and meta-analysis, including a network meta-analysis. METHODS/DESIGN: We will search for published (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ageline) and unpublished (e.g., trial registries, dissertations) randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in all languages examining interventions to prevent falls compared to usual care or other falls prevention interventions among adults aged ≥65 years from all settings (e.g., community, acute care, long-term care, and rehabilitation). The primary outcomes are number of injurious falls and number of hospitalizations due to falls. Secondary outcomes include falls rate, number of fallers, number of emergency room visits due to falls, number of physician visits due to falls, number of fractures, costs, and number of intervention-related harms (e.g., muscle soreness related to exercise). We will calibrate our eligibility criteria amongst the team and two independent team members will screen the literature search results in duplicate. Conflicts will be resolved through team discussion. A similar process will be used for data abstraction and quality appraisal with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Our results will be synthesized descriptively and a random effects meta-analysis will be conducted if the studies are deemed methodologically, clinically, and statistically (e.g., I(2)<60%) similar. If appropriate, a network meta-analysis will be conducted, which will allow the comparison of interventions that have not been compared in head-to-head RCTs, as well as the effectiveness of interventions. DISCUSSION: We will identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent falls in older people. Our results will be used to optimize falls prevention strategies, and our goal is to ultimately improve the health of seniors internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registry number: CRD42013004151
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3683540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36835402013-06-17 Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Tricco, Andrea C Cogo, Elise Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Sibley, Kathryn M Feldman, Fabio Kerr, Gillian Majumdar, Sumit R Jaglal, Susan Straus, Sharon E Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Although numerous trials of falls prevention interventions have been completed, there is extensive variation in their intervention components and clinical context, such that the key elements of an effective falls prevention program remain unclear to patients, clinicians, and policy-makers. Our objective is to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent falls though a systematic review and meta-analysis, including a network meta-analysis. METHODS/DESIGN: We will search for published (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ageline) and unpublished (e.g., trial registries, dissertations) randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in all languages examining interventions to prevent falls compared to usual care or other falls prevention interventions among adults aged ≥65 years from all settings (e.g., community, acute care, long-term care, and rehabilitation). The primary outcomes are number of injurious falls and number of hospitalizations due to falls. Secondary outcomes include falls rate, number of fallers, number of emergency room visits due to falls, number of physician visits due to falls, number of fractures, costs, and number of intervention-related harms (e.g., muscle soreness related to exercise). We will calibrate our eligibility criteria amongst the team and two independent team members will screen the literature search results in duplicate. Conflicts will be resolved through team discussion. A similar process will be used for data abstraction and quality appraisal with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Our results will be synthesized descriptively and a random effects meta-analysis will be conducted if the studies are deemed methodologically, clinically, and statistically (e.g., I(2)<60%) similar. If appropriate, a network meta-analysis will be conducted, which will allow the comparison of interventions that have not been compared in head-to-head RCTs, as well as the effectiveness of interventions. DISCUSSION: We will identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent falls in older people. Our results will be used to optimize falls prevention strategies, and our goal is to ultimately improve the health of seniors internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registry number: CRD42013004151 BioMed Central 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3683540/ /pubmed/23738619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-38 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tricco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Tricco, Andrea C
Cogo, Elise
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Sibley, Kathryn M
Feldman, Fabio
Kerr, Gillian
Majumdar, Sumit R
Jaglal, Susan
Straus, Sharon E
Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-38
work_keys_str_mv AT triccoandreac efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT cogoelise efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT holroydleducjayna efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sibleykathrynm efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT feldmanfabio efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kerrgillian efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT majumdarsumitr efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jaglalsusan efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT straussharone efficacyoffallspreventioninterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis