Cargando…

Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvie, P., Whitwell, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000154
_version_ 1782273555456589824
author Harvie, P.
Whitwell, D.
author_facet Harvie, P.
Whitwell, D.
author_sort Harvie, P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatments have increased both the number and overall survival of patients living with MBD. As a consequence the incidence of complications of MBD presenting to surgeons has increased and is set to increase further. The British Orthopaedic Oncology Society (BOOS) are to publish more revised detailed guidelines on what represents ‘best practice’ in managing patients with MBD. This article is designed to coincide with and publicise new BOOS guidelines and once again champion the cause of patients with MBD. METHODS: A series of short cases highlight common errors frequently being made in managing patients with MBD despite the availability of guidelines. RESULTS: Despite guidelines for the management of patients with MBD being available for more than a decade basic errors in management continue to be made, affecting patient survival and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that by publicising the new BOOS guidelines the management of patients with MBD will improve over the next decade, significantly more than it has over the last decade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3684383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36843832013-06-18 Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines? Harvie, P. Whitwell, D. Bone Joint Res Oncology OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatments have increased both the number and overall survival of patients living with MBD. As a consequence the incidence of complications of MBD presenting to surgeons has increased and is set to increase further. The British Orthopaedic Oncology Society (BOOS) are to publish more revised detailed guidelines on what represents ‘best practice’ in managing patients with MBD. This article is designed to coincide with and publicise new BOOS guidelines and once again champion the cause of patients with MBD. METHODS: A series of short cases highlight common errors frequently being made in managing patients with MBD despite the availability of guidelines. RESULTS: Despite guidelines for the management of patients with MBD being available for more than a decade basic errors in management continue to be made, affecting patient survival and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that by publicising the new BOOS guidelines the management of patients with MBD will improve over the next decade, significantly more than it has over the last decade. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3684383/ /pubmed/23836473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000154 Text en ©2013 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2013 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Harvie, P.
Whitwell, D.
Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
title Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
title_full Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
title_fullStr Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
title_full_unstemmed Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
title_short Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
title_sort metastatic bone disease: have we improved after a decade of guidelines?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000154
work_keys_str_mv AT harviep metastaticbonediseasehaveweimprovedafteradecadeofguidelines
AT whitwelld metastaticbonediseasehaveweimprovedafteradecadeofguidelines