Cargando…

Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies demonstrate that foetal growth restriction and low birth weight affect long-term health. Derangements in tissue-specific epigenetic programming of foetal and placental tissues are a suggested underlying mechanism of which DNA methylation is best understood. DNA me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herzog, Emilie, Galvez, Jubby, Roks, Anton, Stolk, Lisette, Verbiest, Michael, Eilers, Paul, Cornelissen, Jan, Steegers, Eric, Steegers-Theunissen, Régine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-5-8
_version_ 1782273580152651776
author Herzog, Emilie
Galvez, Jubby
Roks, Anton
Stolk, Lisette
Verbiest, Michael
Eilers, Paul
Cornelissen, Jan
Steegers, Eric
Steegers-Theunissen, Régine
author_facet Herzog, Emilie
Galvez, Jubby
Roks, Anton
Stolk, Lisette
Verbiest, Michael
Eilers, Paul
Cornelissen, Jan
Steegers, Eric
Steegers-Theunissen, Régine
author_sort Herzog, Emilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies demonstrate that foetal growth restriction and low birth weight affect long-term health. Derangements in tissue-specific epigenetic programming of foetal and placental tissues are a suggested underlying mechanism of which DNA methylation is best understood. DNA methylation has been mostly investigated in DNA from white blood cells. To improve baseline understanding of tissue-specific DNA methylation, we examined variation in DNA methylation profiles of the imprinted foetal growth genes IGF2 and H19 in three different tissues from the same newborn obtained at the same time. FINDINGS: We obtained DNA from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells (MNC; CD34(+) and CD34(–), n = 6), foetal side of the placenta (n = 5) and umbilical cord Wharton jelly (n = 5). DNA methylation of the IGF2 differentially methylated region (DMR) and H19 DMR was measured using quantitative mass spectrometry. Analysis of variance testing showed no statistical difference between total mean methylation of CD34(+) and CD34(–) MNC. Further comparisons were made with the pooled total MNC fraction. Mean IGF2 DMR methylation of Wharton jelly was 1.3 times higher (P = 0.001) than mean methylation of the pooled MNC. Placental mean methylation was 0.8 times lower (P <0.001) and Wharton jelly 0.9 times lower (P <0.001) than the pooled MNC of H19 DMR. CONCLUSION: The total MNC fraction is a rather homogeneous cell population for methylation studies of imprinted genes in umbilical cord blood white blood cells, but may not always reflect the methylation levels of IGF2 and H19 in other organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3684550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36845502013-06-18 Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns Herzog, Emilie Galvez, Jubby Roks, Anton Stolk, Lisette Verbiest, Michael Eilers, Paul Cornelissen, Jan Steegers, Eric Steegers-Theunissen, Régine Clin Epigenetics Short Report BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies demonstrate that foetal growth restriction and low birth weight affect long-term health. Derangements in tissue-specific epigenetic programming of foetal and placental tissues are a suggested underlying mechanism of which DNA methylation is best understood. DNA methylation has been mostly investigated in DNA from white blood cells. To improve baseline understanding of tissue-specific DNA methylation, we examined variation in DNA methylation profiles of the imprinted foetal growth genes IGF2 and H19 in three different tissues from the same newborn obtained at the same time. FINDINGS: We obtained DNA from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells (MNC; CD34(+) and CD34(–), n = 6), foetal side of the placenta (n = 5) and umbilical cord Wharton jelly (n = 5). DNA methylation of the IGF2 differentially methylated region (DMR) and H19 DMR was measured using quantitative mass spectrometry. Analysis of variance testing showed no statistical difference between total mean methylation of CD34(+) and CD34(–) MNC. Further comparisons were made with the pooled total MNC fraction. Mean IGF2 DMR methylation of Wharton jelly was 1.3 times higher (P = 0.001) than mean methylation of the pooled MNC. Placental mean methylation was 0.8 times lower (P <0.001) and Wharton jelly 0.9 times lower (P <0.001) than the pooled MNC of H19 DMR. CONCLUSION: The total MNC fraction is a rather homogeneous cell population for methylation studies of imprinted genes in umbilical cord blood white blood cells, but may not always reflect the methylation levels of IGF2 and H19 in other organs. BioMed Central 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3684550/ /pubmed/23724794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-5-8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Herzog et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Herzog, Emilie
Galvez, Jubby
Roks, Anton
Stolk, Lisette
Verbiest, Michael
Eilers, Paul
Cornelissen, Jan
Steegers, Eric
Steegers-Theunissen, Régine
Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns
title Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns
title_full Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns
title_fullStr Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns
title_full_unstemmed Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns
title_short Tissue-specific DNA methylation profiles in newborns
title_sort tissue-specific dna methylation profiles in newborns
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-5-8
work_keys_str_mv AT herzogemilie tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT galvezjubby tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT roksanton tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT stolklisette tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT verbiestmichael tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT eilerspaul tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT cornelissenjan tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT steegerseric tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns
AT steegerstheunissenregine tissuespecificdnamethylationprofilesinnewborns