Cargando…

Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?

BACKGROUND: In spite of some dissociation between muscle mass and strength, muscle strength is often used as a proxy to identify individuals with low muscle mass (sarcopenia). Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between muscle strength and the appendicular lean bod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien, Plouffe, Stéphanie, Pion, Charlotte H., Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13539-012-0100-8
_version_ 1782273593791479808
author Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien
Plouffe, Stéphanie
Pion, Charlotte H.
Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène
author_facet Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien
Plouffe, Stéphanie
Pion, Charlotte H.
Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène
author_sort Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In spite of some dissociation between muscle mass and strength, muscle strength is often used as a proxy to identify individuals with low muscle mass (sarcopenia). Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between muscle strength and the appendicular lean body mass index (app LBMI). METHODS: One hundred and five individuals were recruited. Knee extension and handgrip strength were measured. Body composition was assessed by DXA. App LBMI was calculated as appendicular lean body mass divided by height squared. RESULTS: At le level of the entire cohort, both handgrip (r = 0.73; p < 0.001) and knee extension strength (r = 0.57; p < 0.001) were associated with app LBMI. However, in women, knee extension strength (r = 0.32; p < 0.05) but not handgrip strength (r = 0.14; p = 0.35) was associated with app LBMI; while in men, handgrip strength (r = 0.43; p < 0.01) but not knee extension strength (r = 0.27; p = 0.09) was associated with app LBMI. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle strength appears to be associated with lean body mass; however, handgrip strength may be preferentially used in men and knee extension strength in women to detect sarcopenic individuals. Future larger studies are now needed to confirm our findings and their clinical relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3684704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36847042013-06-20 Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index? Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien Plouffe, Stéphanie Pion, Charlotte H. Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Original Article BACKGROUND: In spite of some dissociation between muscle mass and strength, muscle strength is often used as a proxy to identify individuals with low muscle mass (sarcopenia). Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between muscle strength and the appendicular lean body mass index (app LBMI). METHODS: One hundred and five individuals were recruited. Knee extension and handgrip strength were measured. Body composition was assessed by DXA. App LBMI was calculated as appendicular lean body mass divided by height squared. RESULTS: At le level of the entire cohort, both handgrip (r = 0.73; p < 0.001) and knee extension strength (r = 0.57; p < 0.001) were associated with app LBMI. However, in women, knee extension strength (r = 0.32; p < 0.05) but not handgrip strength (r = 0.14; p = 0.35) was associated with app LBMI; while in men, handgrip strength (r = 0.43; p < 0.01) but not knee extension strength (r = 0.27; p = 0.09) was associated with app LBMI. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle strength appears to be associated with lean body mass; however, handgrip strength may be preferentially used in men and knee extension strength in women to detect sarcopenic individuals. Future larger studies are now needed to confirm our findings and their clinical relevance. Springer-Verlag 2013-02-07 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3684704/ /pubmed/23389764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13539-012-0100-8 Text en © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
spellingShingle Original Article
Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien
Plouffe, Stéphanie
Pion, Charlotte H.
Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène
Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
title Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
title_full Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
title_fullStr Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
title_full_unstemmed Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
title_short Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
title_sort toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13539-012-0100-8
work_keys_str_mv AT barbatartigassebastien towardasexspecificrelationshipbetweenmusclestrengthandappendicularleanbodymassindex
AT plouffestephanie towardasexspecificrelationshipbetweenmusclestrengthandappendicularleanbodymassindex
AT pioncharlotteh towardasexspecificrelationshipbetweenmusclestrengthandappendicularleanbodymassindex
AT aubertinleheudremylene towardasexspecificrelationshipbetweenmusclestrengthandappendicularleanbodymassindex