Cargando…

Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report

Splenic angiosarcoma has been presented as an extremely rare malignant tumour. Amongst the rarest of all neoplasms, primary splenic angiosarcoma comprises 0.14–0.25 of all annually reported cases per one million persons Splenic angiosarcoma was first described in 1879 by T. Langerhans. The clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamocki, Zbigniew, Steward, Agnieszka, Zaręba, Konrad Piotr, Kukliński, Adam, Kędra, Boguław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23788995
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2013.34628
_version_ 1782273683599917056
author Kamocki, Zbigniew
Steward, Agnieszka
Zaręba, Konrad Piotr
Kukliński, Adam
Kędra, Boguław
author_facet Kamocki, Zbigniew
Steward, Agnieszka
Zaręba, Konrad Piotr
Kukliński, Adam
Kędra, Boguław
author_sort Kamocki, Zbigniew
collection PubMed
description Splenic angiosarcoma has been presented as an extremely rare malignant tumour. Amongst the rarest of all neoplasms, primary splenic angiosarcoma comprises 0.14–0.25 of all annually reported cases per one million persons Splenic angiosarcoma was first described in 1879 by T. Langerhans. The clinical symptoms and diagnostic values associated with splenic angiosarcoma are extremely variable. Nonetheless, majority of the patients (75%) complain of abdominal pain, and a quarter to one-third present with rupture of the involved organ. We hereby report our experience with two splenic angiosarcoma cases, which despite being similar in their diagnosis, nonetheless present with an entirely different clinical picture. Our first case, whereby the patient presented with a liver that was also affected by the angiosarcoma of the spleen. In the second case however, although the patient did show evidence of metastasis to the abdominal cavity as well as the liver, she also suffered from primary adenocarcinoma of the colon. To our knowledge, no previous article has made mention of primary splenic angiosarcoma existing independently of another primary neoplasm. Both may be found in common practice, and ought to be highlighted for their significance as such.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3685368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36853682013-06-20 Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report Kamocki, Zbigniew Steward, Agnieszka Zaręba, Konrad Piotr Kukliński, Adam Kędra, Boguław Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Case Report Splenic angiosarcoma has been presented as an extremely rare malignant tumour. Amongst the rarest of all neoplasms, primary splenic angiosarcoma comprises 0.14–0.25 of all annually reported cases per one million persons Splenic angiosarcoma was first described in 1879 by T. Langerhans. The clinical symptoms and diagnostic values associated with splenic angiosarcoma are extremely variable. Nonetheless, majority of the patients (75%) complain of abdominal pain, and a quarter to one-third present with rupture of the involved organ. We hereby report our experience with two splenic angiosarcoma cases, which despite being similar in their diagnosis, nonetheless present with an entirely different clinical picture. Our first case, whereby the patient presented with a liver that was also affected by the angiosarcoma of the spleen. In the second case however, although the patient did show evidence of metastasis to the abdominal cavity as well as the liver, she also suffered from primary adenocarcinoma of the colon. To our knowledge, no previous article has made mention of primary splenic angiosarcoma existing independently of another primary neoplasm. Both may be found in common practice, and ought to be highlighted for their significance as such. Termedia Publishing House 2013-04-29 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3685368/ /pubmed/23788995 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2013.34628 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kamocki, Zbigniew
Steward, Agnieszka
Zaręba, Konrad Piotr
Kukliński, Adam
Kędra, Boguław
Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report
title Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report
title_full Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report
title_fullStr Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report
title_full_unstemmed Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report
title_short Primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. Case report
title_sort primary splenic angiosarcoma – the same diagnosis yielding two different clinical pictures. case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23788995
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2013.34628
work_keys_str_mv AT kamockizbigniew primarysplenicangiosarcomathesamediagnosisyieldingtwodifferentclinicalpicturescasereport
AT stewardagnieszka primarysplenicangiosarcomathesamediagnosisyieldingtwodifferentclinicalpicturescasereport
AT zarebakonradpiotr primarysplenicangiosarcomathesamediagnosisyieldingtwodifferentclinicalpicturescasereport
AT kuklinskiadam primarysplenicangiosarcomathesamediagnosisyieldingtwodifferentclinicalpicturescasereport
AT kedraboguław primarysplenicangiosarcomathesamediagnosisyieldingtwodifferentclinicalpicturescasereport