Cargando…

Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of adherence calculation using administrative data for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are prescribed disease-modifying drugs. METHODS: Pharmacy-billed disease-modifying drug prescription claims were selected from the 2007–20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozma, Chris M, Dickson, Michael, Phillips, Amy L, Meletiche, Dennis M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807840
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S40736
_version_ 1782273692213968896
author Kozma, Chris M
Dickson, Michael
Phillips, Amy L
Meletiche, Dennis M
author_facet Kozma, Chris M
Dickson, Michael
Phillips, Amy L
Meletiche, Dennis M
author_sort Kozma, Chris M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of adherence calculation using administrative data for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are prescribed disease-modifying drugs. METHODS: Pharmacy-billed disease-modifying drug prescription claims were selected from the 2007–2008 LifeLink™ Health Plan Claims Database. The index date was the first disease-modifying drug prescription claim. Two cohorts were created: all patients with a disease-modifying drug claim in 2007 and a subset with continuous eligibility for 12 months post-index. Adherence was calculated across all disease-modifying drugs for 12 months post-index. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) with variable (start to end of therapy) and fixed (365 days) duration denominators were calculated. Variable MPR was calculated by summing days supply from the first to the last prescription (inclusive) divided by time between the last prescription date plus days supply and the first prescription date. Variable MPR was evaluated for all patients and the continuously eligible cohort. Fixed MPR used the same numerator but divided by 365 days of follow-up and evaluated only for the continuously eligible cohort. RESULTS: There were 3405 patients with MS and a disease-modifying drug claim in 2007 and 2145 in the continuously eligible cohort. Means for variable MPR ranged from 87.5% ± 16.6% for the continuously eligible cohort to 90.5% ± 16.0% for the 2007 cohort. The comparable value for fixed MPR was 78.0% ± 28.2% for the continuously eligible cohort. Fixed MPR gave a consistently lower rate of adherence than variable MPR at an 80% adherence threshold. CONCLUSION: Different adherence measures can yield different outcomes, especially when using different eligibility criteria. These results demonstrate the importance of full disclosure of methods used for calculations and specification of the study population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3685450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36854502013-06-27 Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis Kozma, Chris M Dickson, Michael Phillips, Amy L Meletiche, Dennis M Patient Prefer Adherence Methodology BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of adherence calculation using administrative data for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are prescribed disease-modifying drugs. METHODS: Pharmacy-billed disease-modifying drug prescription claims were selected from the 2007–2008 LifeLink™ Health Plan Claims Database. The index date was the first disease-modifying drug prescription claim. Two cohorts were created: all patients with a disease-modifying drug claim in 2007 and a subset with continuous eligibility for 12 months post-index. Adherence was calculated across all disease-modifying drugs for 12 months post-index. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) with variable (start to end of therapy) and fixed (365 days) duration denominators were calculated. Variable MPR was calculated by summing days supply from the first to the last prescription (inclusive) divided by time between the last prescription date plus days supply and the first prescription date. Variable MPR was evaluated for all patients and the continuously eligible cohort. Fixed MPR used the same numerator but divided by 365 days of follow-up and evaluated only for the continuously eligible cohort. RESULTS: There were 3405 patients with MS and a disease-modifying drug claim in 2007 and 2145 in the continuously eligible cohort. Means for variable MPR ranged from 87.5% ± 16.6% for the continuously eligible cohort to 90.5% ± 16.0% for the 2007 cohort. The comparable value for fixed MPR was 78.0% ± 28.2% for the continuously eligible cohort. Fixed MPR gave a consistently lower rate of adherence than variable MPR at an 80% adherence threshold. CONCLUSION: Different adherence measures can yield different outcomes, especially when using different eligibility criteria. These results demonstrate the importance of full disclosure of methods used for calculations and specification of the study population. Dove Medical Press 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3685450/ /pubmed/23807840 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S40736 Text en © 2013 Kozma et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Kozma, Chris M
Dickson, Michael
Phillips, Amy L
Meletiche, Dennis M
Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
title Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807840
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S40736
work_keys_str_mv AT kozmachrism medicationpossessionratioimplicationsofusingfixedandvariableobservationperiodsinassessingadherencewithdiseasemodifyingdrugsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT dicksonmichael medicationpossessionratioimplicationsofusingfixedandvariableobservationperiodsinassessingadherencewithdiseasemodifyingdrugsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT phillipsamyl medicationpossessionratioimplicationsofusingfixedandvariableobservationperiodsinassessingadherencewithdiseasemodifyingdrugsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT meletichedennism medicationpossessionratioimplicationsofusingfixedandvariableobservationperiodsinassessingadherencewithdiseasemodifyingdrugsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis