Cargando…

Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies

Previous research has investigated whether visual salience (i.e., how much an item stands out) or perceptual load (i.e., display complexity) is the dominant factor in visual selective attention. The evidence has been mixed, with some findings supporting a dominant role for visual salience and some f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggs, Adam T., Gibson, Bradley S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23801969
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00326
_version_ 1782273739181785088
author Biggs, Adam T.
Gibson, Bradley S.
author_facet Biggs, Adam T.
Gibson, Bradley S.
author_sort Biggs, Adam T.
collection PubMed
description Previous research has investigated whether visual salience (i.e., how much an item stands out) or perceptual load (i.e., display complexity) is the dominant factor in visual selective attention. The evidence has been mixed, with some findings supporting a dominant role for visual salience and some findings supporting a dominant role for perceptual load. However, the complex displays used to impose high perceptual load also introduce a third factor that has gone understudied until recently: the interplay between identity dilution and exposure duration. Adding display items to increase perceptual load dilutes a distractor's identity, which could decrease interference, but the task generally takes longer, which could increase distractor interference. To clarify how these factors interact, the present study used converging measures of distractor interference—both compatibility and singleton presence—to disambiguate effects due to salience, perceptual load, and identity dilution/exposure duration. Compatibility effects support perceptual load as the dominant factor, whereas singleton presence effects do not (Experiment 1). Consistent with salience-based mechanisms, significant distractor processing (both compatibility and presence effects) occurred under high perceptual load when singleton present trials preceded singleton absent trials (Experiment 2A). However, consistent with load-based mechanisms, non-significant compatibility effects occurred under high perceptual load when singleton absent trials preceded singleton present trials (Experiment 2B). Thus, the competition between salience-based and load-based mechanisms depended on the amount of prior experience with singleton present vs. absent displays, which in turn depended on the use of broad vs. narrow attentional allocation strategies. These experience-dependent effects provide further evidence that attention allocation strategies are contingent on factors such as task context and experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3685793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36857932013-06-25 Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies Biggs, Adam T. Gibson, Bradley S. Front Psychol Psychology Previous research has investigated whether visual salience (i.e., how much an item stands out) or perceptual load (i.e., display complexity) is the dominant factor in visual selective attention. The evidence has been mixed, with some findings supporting a dominant role for visual salience and some findings supporting a dominant role for perceptual load. However, the complex displays used to impose high perceptual load also introduce a third factor that has gone understudied until recently: the interplay between identity dilution and exposure duration. Adding display items to increase perceptual load dilutes a distractor's identity, which could decrease interference, but the task generally takes longer, which could increase distractor interference. To clarify how these factors interact, the present study used converging measures of distractor interference—both compatibility and singleton presence—to disambiguate effects due to salience, perceptual load, and identity dilution/exposure duration. Compatibility effects support perceptual load as the dominant factor, whereas singleton presence effects do not (Experiment 1). Consistent with salience-based mechanisms, significant distractor processing (both compatibility and presence effects) occurred under high perceptual load when singleton present trials preceded singleton absent trials (Experiment 2A). However, consistent with load-based mechanisms, non-significant compatibility effects occurred under high perceptual load when singleton absent trials preceded singleton present trials (Experiment 2B). Thus, the competition between salience-based and load-based mechanisms depended on the amount of prior experience with singleton present vs. absent displays, which in turn depended on the use of broad vs. narrow attentional allocation strategies. These experience-dependent effects provide further evidence that attention allocation strategies are contingent on factors such as task context and experience. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3685793/ /pubmed/23801969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00326 Text en Copyright © 2013 Biggs and Gibson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Biggs, Adam T.
Gibson, Bradley S.
Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
title Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
title_full Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
title_fullStr Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
title_full_unstemmed Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
title_short Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
title_sort learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23801969
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00326
work_keys_str_mv AT biggsadamt learningtoignoresalientcolordistractorsduringserialsearchevidenceforexperiencedependentattentionallocationstrategies
AT gibsonbradleys learningtoignoresalientcolordistractorsduringserialsearchevidenceforexperiencedependentattentionallocationstrategies