Cargando…
Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010
OBJECTIVE: To assess if the risk of first-time salpingectomy was affected by prior hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes and by prior sterilisation. DESIGN: A historical cohort study. SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 170 000 randomly selected women born 1947–1963 (10 000/year) were followed from...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002845 |
_version_ | 1782273763234021376 |
---|---|
author | Guldberg, Rikke Wehberg, Sonja Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel Mogensen, Ole Lidegaard, Øjvind |
author_facet | Guldberg, Rikke Wehberg, Sonja Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel Mogensen, Ole Lidegaard, Øjvind |
author_sort | Guldberg, Rikke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess if the risk of first-time salpingectomy was affected by prior hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes and by prior sterilisation. DESIGN: A historical cohort study. SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 170 000 randomly selected women born 1947–1963 (10 000/year) were followed from 1977 until the end of 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effect of hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes or sterilisation on the risk of salpingectomy. Both were modelled in a Cox proportional hazards model as time-dependent covariates, analysing time to first salpingectomy. End of follow-up period was 31 December 2010. RESULTS: Of 9591 hysterectomies, 6456 (67.3%) had both fallopian tubes retained. HRs for salpingectomy after hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes and sterilisation were 2.13 (95% 1.88 to 2.42) and 2.42 (2.21 to 2.64), as compared with those for non-hysterectomised and non-sterilised women. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes or sterilisation have at least a doubled risk of subsequent salpingectomy. Removal of the fallopian tubes at hysterectomy should therefore be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3686168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36861682013-06-20 Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 Guldberg, Rikke Wehberg, Sonja Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel Mogensen, Ole Lidegaard, Øjvind BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To assess if the risk of first-time salpingectomy was affected by prior hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes and by prior sterilisation. DESIGN: A historical cohort study. SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 170 000 randomly selected women born 1947–1963 (10 000/year) were followed from 1977 until the end of 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effect of hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes or sterilisation on the risk of salpingectomy. Both were modelled in a Cox proportional hazards model as time-dependent covariates, analysing time to first salpingectomy. End of follow-up period was 31 December 2010. RESULTS: Of 9591 hysterectomies, 6456 (67.3%) had both fallopian tubes retained. HRs for salpingectomy after hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes and sterilisation were 2.13 (95% 1.88 to 2.42) and 2.42 (2.21 to 2.64), as compared with those for non-hysterectomised and non-sterilised women. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing hysterectomy with retained fallopian tubes or sterilisation have at least a doubled risk of subsequent salpingectomy. Removal of the fallopian tubes at hysterectomy should therefore be recommended. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3686168/ /pubmed/23794553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002845 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Guldberg, Rikke Wehberg, Sonja Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel Mogensen, Ole Lidegaard, Øjvind Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
title | Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
title_full | Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
title_fullStr | Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
title_short | Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
title_sort | salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? a danish cohort study, 1977–2010 |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guldbergrikke salpingectomyasstandardathysterectomyadanishcohortstudy19772010 AT wehbergsonja salpingectomyasstandardathysterectomyadanishcohortstudy19772010 AT skovlundcharlottewessel salpingectomyasstandardathysterectomyadanishcohortstudy19772010 AT mogensenole salpingectomyasstandardathysterectomyadanishcohortstudy19772010 AT lidegaardøjvind salpingectomyasstandardathysterectomyadanishcohortstudy19772010 |