Cargando…

Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE: An analysis of paid malpractice claims judged in court compared with those settled out of court may help explain perceptions of malpractice risk. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis and cross-sectional comparison of malpractice claims. Evaluated trends in the number and proportion of paid cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubin, Jessica B, Bishop, Tara F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002985
_version_ 1782273763931324416
author Rubin, Jessica B
Bishop, Tara F
author_facet Rubin, Jessica B
Bishop, Tara F
author_sort Rubin, Jessica B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: An analysis of paid malpractice claims judged in court compared with those settled out of court may help explain perceptions of malpractice risk. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis and cross-sectional comparison of malpractice claims. Evaluated trends in the number and proportion of paid claims, and mean payment amount by resolution type; identified patient, physician and claim characteristics associated with each resolution type. Examined the effects of resolution type on payment amount and time to claim resolution. SETTING: Claims paid on behalf of US physicians reported in the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) from 2005 to 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of resolution, claim characteristics, payment amount and time to resolution. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2009, there were 58 667 claims paid on behalf of US physicians. Of these paid claims, 56 850 (96.9%) were settled outside court, and 1817 (3.1%) were judged in court. There was no significant change in the proportion of paid claims resolved by settlement versus judgement over time (p=0.83); nor was there a significant change in the mean payment amount in either resolution group (settlement, p=0.94; judgement, p=0.36). The claims in which the physicians were under 50, had prior malpractice reports, which were paid by a state malpractice programme, for adverse events to a fetus, and for surgical or obstetric error were more likely to be judged in court. The mean payment amount (US$592 283 vs US$317 447, p<0.01), per cent of payments over US$1 million (41.82% vs 15.43%, p<0.01), and time to decision (6.50 years vs 4.93 years, p<0.01) were significantly higher in judged claims. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a very small percentage of paid malpractice claims in the USA are judged in court, a number of characteristics differ between settled and judged claims. Such differences may influence perceptions of malpractice risk and future reform efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3686171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36861712013-06-20 Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis Rubin, Jessica B Bishop, Tara F BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: An analysis of paid malpractice claims judged in court compared with those settled out of court may help explain perceptions of malpractice risk. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis and cross-sectional comparison of malpractice claims. Evaluated trends in the number and proportion of paid claims, and mean payment amount by resolution type; identified patient, physician and claim characteristics associated with each resolution type. Examined the effects of resolution type on payment amount and time to claim resolution. SETTING: Claims paid on behalf of US physicians reported in the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) from 2005 to 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of resolution, claim characteristics, payment amount and time to resolution. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2009, there were 58 667 claims paid on behalf of US physicians. Of these paid claims, 56 850 (96.9%) were settled outside court, and 1817 (3.1%) were judged in court. There was no significant change in the proportion of paid claims resolved by settlement versus judgement over time (p=0.83); nor was there a significant change in the mean payment amount in either resolution group (settlement, p=0.94; judgement, p=0.36). The claims in which the physicians were under 50, had prior malpractice reports, which were paid by a state malpractice programme, for adverse events to a fetus, and for surgical or obstetric error were more likely to be judged in court. The mean payment amount (US$592 283 vs US$317 447, p<0.01), per cent of payments over US$1 million (41.82% vs 15.43%, p<0.01), and time to decision (6.50 years vs 4.93 years, p<0.01) were significantly higher in judged claims. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a very small percentage of paid malpractice claims in the USA are judged in court, a number of characteristics differ between settled and judged claims. Such differences may influence perceptions of malpractice risk and future reform efforts. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3686171/ /pubmed/23794584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002985 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Health Policy
Rubin, Jessica B
Bishop, Tara F
Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
title Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
title_full Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
title_short Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
title_sort characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the usa: a retrospective analysis
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002985
work_keys_str_mv AT rubinjessicab characteristicsofpaidmalpracticeclaimssettledinandoutofcourtintheusaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bishoptaraf characteristicsofpaidmalpracticeclaimssettledinandoutofcourtintheusaaretrospectiveanalysis