Cargando…
Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes. DESIGN: Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Ca...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092 |
_version_ | 1782273780709588992 |
---|---|
author | Evans, David Lobbedez, Thierry Verger, Christian Flahault, Antoine |
author_facet | Evans, David Lobbedez, Thierry Verger, Christian Flahault, Antoine |
author_sort | Evans, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes. DESIGN: Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of (hypothetical) intervention effects. SETTING: 112 secondary-care centres in France. PARTICIPANTS: 9602 adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technique failure (ie, permanent transfer to haemodialysis), renal transplantation and death while on peritoneal dialysis within 5 years of initiating treatment. Associations with underlying risk measured by cause-specific HRs (cs-HRs) and with cumulative incidence by subdistribution HRs (sd-HRs). Intervention effects measured by predicted mean change in cumulative incidences. RESULTS: Higher volume centres had more patients with diabetes and were more frequently academic centres or associative groupings of private physicians. Patients in higher volume centres had a reduced risk of technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted cs-HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69), with no changed risk of death or transplantation. Sensitivity analyses mitigated the cs-HRs without changing the findings. In higher volume centres, the cumulative incidence was reduced for technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted sd-HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85) but was increased for transplantation and death (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: transplantation—adjusted sd-HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.24; death—adjusted sd-HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63). The predicted reduction in cumulative incidence of technique failure was largest under a scenario of shifting all patients to the two highest volume centre groups (0.091 reduction) but lower for three more realistic interventions (around 0.06 reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating peritoneal dialysis in high-volume centres had a considerably reduced risk of technique failure but simulations of interventions to increase exposure to high-volume centres yielded only modest improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3686247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36862472013-06-20 Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study Evans, David Lobbedez, Thierry Verger, Christian Flahault, Antoine BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes. DESIGN: Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of (hypothetical) intervention effects. SETTING: 112 secondary-care centres in France. PARTICIPANTS: 9602 adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technique failure (ie, permanent transfer to haemodialysis), renal transplantation and death while on peritoneal dialysis within 5 years of initiating treatment. Associations with underlying risk measured by cause-specific HRs (cs-HRs) and with cumulative incidence by subdistribution HRs (sd-HRs). Intervention effects measured by predicted mean change in cumulative incidences. RESULTS: Higher volume centres had more patients with diabetes and were more frequently academic centres or associative groupings of private physicians. Patients in higher volume centres had a reduced risk of technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted cs-HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69), with no changed risk of death or transplantation. Sensitivity analyses mitigated the cs-HRs without changing the findings. In higher volume centres, the cumulative incidence was reduced for technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted sd-HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85) but was increased for transplantation and death (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: transplantation—adjusted sd-HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.24; death—adjusted sd-HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63). The predicted reduction in cumulative incidence of technique failure was largest under a scenario of shifting all patients to the two highest volume centre groups (0.091 reduction) but lower for three more realistic interventions (around 0.06 reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating peritoneal dialysis in high-volume centres had a considerably reduced risk of technique failure but simulations of interventions to increase exposure to high-volume centres yielded only modest improvements. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3686247/ /pubmed/23794562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Evans, David Lobbedez, Thierry Verger, Christian Flahault, Antoine Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study |
title | Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study |
title_full | Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study |
title_fullStr | Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study |
title_short | Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study |
title_sort | would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? a registry-based cohort and monte carlo simulation study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evansdavid wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy AT lobbedezthierry wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy AT vergerchristian wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy AT flahaultantoine wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy |