Cargando…

Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes. DESIGN: Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, David, Lobbedez, Thierry, Verger, Christian, Flahault, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092
_version_ 1782273780709588992
author Evans, David
Lobbedez, Thierry
Verger, Christian
Flahault, Antoine
author_facet Evans, David
Lobbedez, Thierry
Verger, Christian
Flahault, Antoine
author_sort Evans, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes. DESIGN: Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of (hypothetical) intervention effects. SETTING: 112 secondary-care centres in France. PARTICIPANTS: 9602 adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technique failure (ie, permanent transfer to haemodialysis), renal transplantation and death while on peritoneal dialysis within 5 years of initiating treatment. Associations with underlying risk measured by cause-specific HRs (cs-HRs) and with cumulative incidence by subdistribution HRs (sd-HRs). Intervention effects measured by predicted mean change in cumulative incidences. RESULTS: Higher volume centres had more patients with diabetes and were more frequently academic centres or associative groupings of private physicians. Patients in higher volume centres had a reduced risk of technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted cs-HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69), with no changed risk of death or transplantation. Sensitivity analyses mitigated the cs-HRs without changing the findings. In higher volume centres, the cumulative incidence was reduced for technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted sd-HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85) but was increased for transplantation and death (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: transplantation—adjusted sd-HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.24; death—adjusted sd-HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63). The predicted reduction in cumulative incidence of technique failure was largest under a scenario of shifting all patients to the two highest volume centre groups (0.091 reduction) but lower for three more realistic interventions (around 0.06 reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating peritoneal dialysis in high-volume centres had a considerably reduced risk of technique failure but simulations of interventions to increase exposure to high-volume centres yielded only modest improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3686247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36862472013-06-20 Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study Evans, David Lobbedez, Thierry Verger, Christian Flahault, Antoine BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes. DESIGN: Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of (hypothetical) intervention effects. SETTING: 112 secondary-care centres in France. PARTICIPANTS: 9602 adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technique failure (ie, permanent transfer to haemodialysis), renal transplantation and death while on peritoneal dialysis within 5 years of initiating treatment. Associations with underlying risk measured by cause-specific HRs (cs-HRs) and with cumulative incidence by subdistribution HRs (sd-HRs). Intervention effects measured by predicted mean change in cumulative incidences. RESULTS: Higher volume centres had more patients with diabetes and were more frequently academic centres or associative groupings of private physicians. Patients in higher volume centres had a reduced risk of technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted cs-HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69), with no changed risk of death or transplantation. Sensitivity analyses mitigated the cs-HRs without changing the findings. In higher volume centres, the cumulative incidence was reduced for technique failure (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: adjusted sd-HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85) but was increased for transplantation and death (>60 patients vs 0–10 patients: transplantation—adjusted sd-HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.24; death—adjusted sd-HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63). The predicted reduction in cumulative incidence of technique failure was largest under a scenario of shifting all patients to the two highest volume centre groups (0.091 reduction) but lower for three more realistic interventions (around 0.06 reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating peritoneal dialysis in high-volume centres had a considerably reduced risk of technique failure but simulations of interventions to increase exposure to high-volume centres yielded only modest improvements. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3686247/ /pubmed/23794562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Evans, David
Lobbedez, Thierry
Verger, Christian
Flahault, Antoine
Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
title Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
title_full Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
title_fullStr Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
title_short Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study
title_sort would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? a registry-based cohort and monte carlo simulation study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092
work_keys_str_mv AT evansdavid wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy
AT lobbedezthierry wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy
AT vergerchristian wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy
AT flahaultantoine wouldincreasingcentrevolumesimprovepatientoutcomesinperitonealdialysisaregistrybasedcohortandmontecarlosimulationstudy