Cargando…

Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria

BACKGROUND: The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Nigeria was launched in 2005 as part of efforts by the federal government to achieve universal coverage using financial risk protection mechanisms. However, only 4% of the population, and mainly federal government employees, are currently co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onoka, Chima A, Onwujekwe, Obinna E, Uzochukwu, Benjamin S, Ezumah, Nkoli N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23764306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-20
_version_ 1782273797043257344
author Onoka, Chima A
Onwujekwe, Obinna E
Uzochukwu, Benjamin S
Ezumah, Nkoli N
author_facet Onoka, Chima A
Onwujekwe, Obinna E
Uzochukwu, Benjamin S
Ezumah, Nkoli N
author_sort Onoka, Chima A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Nigeria was launched in 2005 as part of efforts by the federal government to achieve universal coverage using financial risk protection mechanisms. However, only 4% of the population, and mainly federal government employees, are currently covered by health insurance and this is primarily through the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme (FSSHIP) of the NHIS. This study aimed to understand why different state (sub-national) governments decided whether or not to adopt the FSSHIP for their employees. METHODS: This study used a comparative case study approach. Data were collected through document reviews and 48 in-depth interviews with policy makers, programme managers, health providers, and civil servant leaders. RESULTS: Although the programme’s benefits seemed acceptable to state policy makers and the intended beneficiaries (employees), the feasibility of employer contributions, concerns about transparency in the NHIS and the role of states in the FSSHIP, the roles of policy champions such as state governors and resistance by employees to making contributions, all influenced the decision of state governments on adoption. Overall, the power of state governments over state-level health reforms, attributed to the prevailing system of government that allows states to deliberate on certain national-level policies, enhanced by the NHIS legislation that made adoption voluntary, enabled states to adopt or not to adopt the program. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates and supports observations that even when the content of a programme is generally acceptable, context, actor roles, and the wider implications of programme design on actor interests can explain decision on policy adoption. Policy implementers involved in scaling-up the NHIS programme need to consider the prevailing contextual factors, and effectively engage policy champions to overcome known challenges in order to encourage adoption by sub-national governments. Policy makers and implementers in countries scaling-up health insurance coverage should, early enough, develop strategies to overcome political challenges inherent in the path to scaling-up, to avoid delay or stunting of the process. They should also consider the potential pitfalls of reforms that first focus on civil servants, especially when the use of public funds potentially compromises coverage for other citizens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3686590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36865902013-06-20 Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria Onoka, Chima A Onwujekwe, Obinna E Uzochukwu, Benjamin S Ezumah, Nkoli N Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Nigeria was launched in 2005 as part of efforts by the federal government to achieve universal coverage using financial risk protection mechanisms. However, only 4% of the population, and mainly federal government employees, are currently covered by health insurance and this is primarily through the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme (FSSHIP) of the NHIS. This study aimed to understand why different state (sub-national) governments decided whether or not to adopt the FSSHIP for their employees. METHODS: This study used a comparative case study approach. Data were collected through document reviews and 48 in-depth interviews with policy makers, programme managers, health providers, and civil servant leaders. RESULTS: Although the programme’s benefits seemed acceptable to state policy makers and the intended beneficiaries (employees), the feasibility of employer contributions, concerns about transparency in the NHIS and the role of states in the FSSHIP, the roles of policy champions such as state governors and resistance by employees to making contributions, all influenced the decision of state governments on adoption. Overall, the power of state governments over state-level health reforms, attributed to the prevailing system of government that allows states to deliberate on certain national-level policies, enhanced by the NHIS legislation that made adoption voluntary, enabled states to adopt or not to adopt the program. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates and supports observations that even when the content of a programme is generally acceptable, context, actor roles, and the wider implications of programme design on actor interests can explain decision on policy adoption. Policy implementers involved in scaling-up the NHIS programme need to consider the prevailing contextual factors, and effectively engage policy champions to overcome known challenges in order to encourage adoption by sub-national governments. Policy makers and implementers in countries scaling-up health insurance coverage should, early enough, develop strategies to overcome political challenges inherent in the path to scaling-up, to avoid delay or stunting of the process. They should also consider the potential pitfalls of reforms that first focus on civil servants, especially when the use of public funds potentially compromises coverage for other citizens. BioMed Central 2013-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3686590/ /pubmed/23764306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-20 Text en Copyright © 2013 Onoka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Onoka, Chima A
Onwujekwe, Obinna E
Uzochukwu, Benjamin S
Ezumah, Nkoli N
Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria
title Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria
title_full Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria
title_fullStr Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria
title_short Promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in Nigeria
title_sort promoting universal financial protection: constraints and enabling factors in scaling-up coverage with social health insurance in nigeria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23764306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-20
work_keys_str_mv AT onokachimaa promotinguniversalfinancialprotectionconstraintsandenablingfactorsinscalingupcoveragewithsocialhealthinsuranceinnigeria
AT onwujekweobinnae promotinguniversalfinancialprotectionconstraintsandenablingfactorsinscalingupcoveragewithsocialhealthinsuranceinnigeria
AT uzochukwubenjamins promotinguniversalfinancialprotectionconstraintsandenablingfactorsinscalingupcoveragewithsocialhealthinsuranceinnigeria
AT ezumahnkolin promotinguniversalfinancialprotectionconstraintsandenablingfactorsinscalingupcoveragewithsocialhealthinsuranceinnigeria