Cargando…

Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: The TNM staging criteria for gastric carcinoma have seen numerous revisions, the most recent of which are reflected in the seventh edition AJCC TNM cancer staging manual. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the sixth and seventh TNM classification of gastric cancer on a prospective da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graziosi, Luigina, Marino, Elisabetta, Cavazzoni, Emanuel, Donini, Annibale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23687939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-103
_version_ 1782273807300427776
author Graziosi, Luigina
Marino, Elisabetta
Cavazzoni, Emanuel
Donini, Annibale
author_facet Graziosi, Luigina
Marino, Elisabetta
Cavazzoni, Emanuel
Donini, Annibale
author_sort Graziosi, Luigina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The TNM staging criteria for gastric carcinoma have seen numerous revisions, the most recent of which are reflected in the seventh edition AJCC TNM cancer staging manual. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the sixth and seventh TNM classification of gastric cancer on a prospective database, regarding patients operated on for primary gastric cancer, was conducted. The end point of the study was prognosis evaluation in terms of overall survival. Patients operated on for primary gastric cancer between September 2003 and March 2012 at our Department of Emergency and General Surgery, were consecutively retrieved in this study; a total of 114 patients were considered. Cardia gastric cancers, gastric lymphomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) were excluded. Median and mean follow-up periods were 22.5 and 27.7 months (range 15 days to 5 years). Both TNM6 and TNM7 were used to evaluate our patients. Overall survival and survival rates at different stages were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were determined using a log-rank test. Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to identify significant factors related to prognosis in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall survival between the sixth and seventh TNM classification was not significantly different. Both the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the multivariate analysis showed that the major negative prognostic factor was lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001 in the univariate analysis and P = 0.035 to 0.048 in the multivariate analysis). Stage distribution and stage-related survival changed from the sixth to the seventh edition, especially in T3 stage where median survival for the sixth edition was 720 days versus 1,200 days for the seventh edition. Moreover, differences were shown in the survival rate of N1 versus N2 stages within the seventh TNM. CONCLUSIONS: Even though further studies are needed in order to increase the number of patients studied, the seventh edition seems to provide a more accurate prognosis, especially regarding N1 and N2 tumors, showing that the most important prognostic factor is lymphovascular invasion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3686645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36866452013-06-20 Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer Graziosi, Luigina Marino, Elisabetta Cavazzoni, Emanuel Donini, Annibale World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The TNM staging criteria for gastric carcinoma have seen numerous revisions, the most recent of which are reflected in the seventh edition AJCC TNM cancer staging manual. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the sixth and seventh TNM classification of gastric cancer on a prospective database, regarding patients operated on for primary gastric cancer, was conducted. The end point of the study was prognosis evaluation in terms of overall survival. Patients operated on for primary gastric cancer between September 2003 and March 2012 at our Department of Emergency and General Surgery, were consecutively retrieved in this study; a total of 114 patients were considered. Cardia gastric cancers, gastric lymphomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) were excluded. Median and mean follow-up periods were 22.5 and 27.7 months (range 15 days to 5 years). Both TNM6 and TNM7 were used to evaluate our patients. Overall survival and survival rates at different stages were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were determined using a log-rank test. Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to identify significant factors related to prognosis in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall survival between the sixth and seventh TNM classification was not significantly different. Both the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the multivariate analysis showed that the major negative prognostic factor was lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001 in the univariate analysis and P = 0.035 to 0.048 in the multivariate analysis). Stage distribution and stage-related survival changed from the sixth to the seventh edition, especially in T3 stage where median survival for the sixth edition was 720 days versus 1,200 days for the seventh edition. Moreover, differences were shown in the survival rate of N1 versus N2 stages within the seventh TNM. CONCLUSIONS: Even though further studies are needed in order to increase the number of patients studied, the seventh edition seems to provide a more accurate prognosis, especially regarding N1 and N2 tumors, showing that the most important prognostic factor is lymphovascular invasion. BioMed Central 2013-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3686645/ /pubmed/23687939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-103 Text en Copyright ©2013 Graziosi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Graziosi, Luigina
Marino, Elisabetta
Cavazzoni, Emanuel
Donini, Annibale
Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
title Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
title_full Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
title_short Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
title_sort prognostic value of the seventh ajcc/uicc tnm classification of non-cardia gastric cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23687939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-103
work_keys_str_mv AT graziosiluigina prognosticvalueoftheseventhajccuicctnmclassificationofnoncardiagastriccancer
AT marinoelisabetta prognosticvalueoftheseventhajccuicctnmclassificationofnoncardiagastriccancer
AT cavazzoniemanuel prognosticvalueoftheseventhajccuicctnmclassificationofnoncardiagastriccancer
AT doniniannibale prognosticvalueoftheseventhajccuicctnmclassificationofnoncardiagastriccancer