Cargando…
Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The European Community recommends the implementation of population-based screening programmes for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. This recommendation is supported by many observational studies showing that organised programmes effectively reduce mortality and control the inappr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-464 |
_version_ | 1782273808208494592 |
---|---|
author | Camilloni, Laura Ferroni, Eliana Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez Pezzarossi, Annamaria Furnari, Giacomo Borgia, Piero Guasticchi, Gabriella Rossi, Paolo Giorgi |
author_facet | Camilloni, Laura Ferroni, Eliana Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez Pezzarossi, Annamaria Furnari, Giacomo Borgia, Piero Guasticchi, Gabriella Rossi, Paolo Giorgi |
author_sort | Camilloni, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The European Community recommends the implementation of population-based screening programmes for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. This recommendation is supported by many observational studies showing that organised programmes effectively reduce mortality and control the inappropriate use of screening tests. We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of interventions to increase participation in organised population-based screening programs. METHODS: We included all studies on interventions aimed at increasing screening participation published between 1/1999 and 7/2012. For those published before 1999, we considered the Jepson et al. (2000) review (Health Technol Assess 4:1-133, 2000). RESULTS: Including studies from the Jepson review, we found 69 with quantitative information on interventions in organised screening: 19 for cervical, 26 for breast, 20 colorectal cancers, and 4 for cervical and breast cancer together. Effective interventions were: postal (breast RR = 1,37 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 1.25-1.51; cervical RR = 1.71 95% CI: 1.60-1.83; colorectal RR = 1.33 95% CI: 1.17-1.51) and telephone reminders (with heterogeneous methods for implementation); GP’s signature on invitation letter (breast RR = 1.13 95% CI: 1.11-1.16; cervical RR = 1.20 95% CI: 1.10-1.30; colorectal RR = 1.15 95% CI: 1.07-1.24); scheduled appointment instead of open appointment (breast RR = 1.26 95% CI: 1.02-1.55; cervical RR = 1.49 95% CI: 1.27-1.75; colorectal RR = 1.79 95% CI: 1.65-1.93). Mailing a kit for self-sampling cervical specimens increased participation in non-responders (RR = 2.37 95% CI: 1.44-3.90). CONCLUSION: Although some interventions did prove to be effective, some specific variables may influence their effectiveness in and applicability to organised population-based screening programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3686655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36866552013-06-20 Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review Camilloni, Laura Ferroni, Eliana Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez Pezzarossi, Annamaria Furnari, Giacomo Borgia, Piero Guasticchi, Gabriella Rossi, Paolo Giorgi BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The European Community recommends the implementation of population-based screening programmes for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. This recommendation is supported by many observational studies showing that organised programmes effectively reduce mortality and control the inappropriate use of screening tests. We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of interventions to increase participation in organised population-based screening programs. METHODS: We included all studies on interventions aimed at increasing screening participation published between 1/1999 and 7/2012. For those published before 1999, we considered the Jepson et al. (2000) review (Health Technol Assess 4:1-133, 2000). RESULTS: Including studies from the Jepson review, we found 69 with quantitative information on interventions in organised screening: 19 for cervical, 26 for breast, 20 colorectal cancers, and 4 for cervical and breast cancer together. Effective interventions were: postal (breast RR = 1,37 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 1.25-1.51; cervical RR = 1.71 95% CI: 1.60-1.83; colorectal RR = 1.33 95% CI: 1.17-1.51) and telephone reminders (with heterogeneous methods for implementation); GP’s signature on invitation letter (breast RR = 1.13 95% CI: 1.11-1.16; cervical RR = 1.20 95% CI: 1.10-1.30; colorectal RR = 1.15 95% CI: 1.07-1.24); scheduled appointment instead of open appointment (breast RR = 1.26 95% CI: 1.02-1.55; cervical RR = 1.49 95% CI: 1.27-1.75; colorectal RR = 1.79 95% CI: 1.65-1.93). Mailing a kit for self-sampling cervical specimens increased participation in non-responders (RR = 2.37 95% CI: 1.44-3.90). CONCLUSION: Although some interventions did prove to be effective, some specific variables may influence their effectiveness in and applicability to organised population-based screening programs. BioMed Central 2013-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3686655/ /pubmed/23663511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-464 Text en Copyright © 2013 Camilloni et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Camilloni, Laura Ferroni, Eliana Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez Pezzarossi, Annamaria Furnari, Giacomo Borgia, Piero Guasticchi, Gabriella Rossi, Paolo Giorgi Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
title | Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
title_full | Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
title_short | Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
title_sort | methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camillonilaura methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT ferronieliana methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT cendalesbeatrizjimenez methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT pezzarossiannamaria methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT furnarigiacomo methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT borgiapiero methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT guasticchigabriella methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview AT rossipaologiorgi methodstoincreaseparticipationinorganisedscreeningprogramsasystematicreview |