Cargando…
Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research
BACKGROUND: Many of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-63 |
_version_ | 1782273810281529344 |
---|---|
author | Nilsen, Per Ståhl, Christian Roback, Kerstin Cairney, Paul |
author_facet | Nilsen, Per Ståhl, Christian Roback, Kerstin Cairney, Paul |
author_sort | Nilsen, Per |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science. DISCUSSION: Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature. SUMMARY: There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3686664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36866642013-06-20 Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research Nilsen, Per Ståhl, Christian Roback, Kerstin Cairney, Paul Implement Sci Debate BACKGROUND: Many of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science. DISCUSSION: Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature. SUMMARY: There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research. BioMed Central 2013-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3686664/ /pubmed/23758952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-63 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nilsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Nilsen, Per Ståhl, Christian Roback, Kerstin Cairney, Paul Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
title | Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
title_full | Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
title_fullStr | Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
title_full_unstemmed | Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
title_short | Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
title_sort | never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nilsenper neverthetwainshallmeetacomparisonofimplementationscienceandpolicyimplementationresearch AT stahlchristian neverthetwainshallmeetacomparisonofimplementationscienceandpolicyimplementationresearch AT robackkerstin neverthetwainshallmeetacomparisonofimplementationscienceandpolicyimplementationresearch AT cairneypaul neverthetwainshallmeetacomparisonofimplementationscienceandpolicyimplementationresearch |