Cargando…
Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis
INTRODUCTION: This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart [with/without oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs)] as the only insulin therapy. METHODS: A(1)chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational, 24-we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23757032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-013-0026-y |
_version_ | 1782273864050409472 |
---|---|
author | Randeree, Hoosen Liebl, Andreas Hajjaji, Issam Khamseh, Mohammad Zajdenverg, Lenita Chen, Jian-Wen Haddad, Jihad |
author_facet | Randeree, Hoosen Liebl, Andreas Hajjaji, Issam Khamseh, Mohammad Zajdenverg, Lenita Chen, Jian-Wen Haddad, Jihad |
author_sort | Randeree, Hoosen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart [with/without oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs)] as the only insulin therapy. METHODS: A(1)chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting/switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir or insulin aspart treatment (alone/in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart (±OGLDs) as the only insulin therapy. Data were analyzed for all patients, insulin-experienced and insulin-naive sub-groups, and sub-groups defined by the number of OGLDs prescribed at baseline (no OGLDs, one OGLD or ≥two OGLDs). Safety and effectiveness endpoints were assessed at baseline and following 24 weeks’ therapy. RESULTS: In total, 2,026 patients were included (insulin-experienced, n = 561; insulin-naive, n = 1,465) in this sub-analysis. Significant improvements from baseline after 24 weeks’ treatment with insulin aspart ± OGLDs were observed across all sub-groups for: glycated hemoglobin (range of means across sub-groups −1.6 to −2.4%; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), fasting plasma glucose (−2.5 to −3.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), post-breakfast post-prandial glucose (−3.4 to −5.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The proportion of patients reporting hypoglycemia events was significantly reduced from baseline after 24 weeks (insulin-naive cohort: 7.9–2.8%; p < 0.001; insulin-experienced cohort: 23.2–7.8%; p < 0.001). There were no reports of major hypoglycemia events at 24 weeks; risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia was <0.6 events/person-year. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Insulin aspart ± OGLDs is associated with significant improvements in glycemic control and HRQoL, without increased risk of hypoglycemia, in people with type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3687096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36870962013-06-20 Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis Randeree, Hoosen Liebl, Andreas Hajjaji, Issam Khamseh, Mohammad Zajdenverg, Lenita Chen, Jian-Wen Haddad, Jihad Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart [with/without oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs)] as the only insulin therapy. METHODS: A(1)chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting/switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir or insulin aspart treatment (alone/in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart (±OGLDs) as the only insulin therapy. Data were analyzed for all patients, insulin-experienced and insulin-naive sub-groups, and sub-groups defined by the number of OGLDs prescribed at baseline (no OGLDs, one OGLD or ≥two OGLDs). Safety and effectiveness endpoints were assessed at baseline and following 24 weeks’ therapy. RESULTS: In total, 2,026 patients were included (insulin-experienced, n = 561; insulin-naive, n = 1,465) in this sub-analysis. Significant improvements from baseline after 24 weeks’ treatment with insulin aspart ± OGLDs were observed across all sub-groups for: glycated hemoglobin (range of means across sub-groups −1.6 to −2.4%; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), fasting plasma glucose (−2.5 to −3.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), post-breakfast post-prandial glucose (−3.4 to −5.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The proportion of patients reporting hypoglycemia events was significantly reduced from baseline after 24 weeks (insulin-naive cohort: 7.9–2.8%; p < 0.001; insulin-experienced cohort: 23.2–7.8%; p < 0.001). There were no reports of major hypoglycemia events at 24 weeks; risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia was <0.6 events/person-year. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Insulin aspart ± OGLDs is associated with significant improvements in glycemic control and HRQoL, without increased risk of hypoglycemia, in people with type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control. Springer Healthcare 2013-06-12 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3687096/ /pubmed/23757032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-013-0026-y Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Randeree, Hoosen Liebl, Andreas Hajjaji, Issam Khamseh, Mohammad Zajdenverg, Lenita Chen, Jian-Wen Haddad, Jihad Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis |
title | Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis |
title_full | Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis |
title_short | Safety and Effectiveness of Bolus Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A(1)chieve Sub-Analysis |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: a(1)chieve sub-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23757032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-013-0026-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randereehoosen safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis AT lieblandreas safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis AT hajjajiissam safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis AT khamsehmohammad safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis AT zajdenverglenita safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis AT chenjianwen safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis AT haddadjihad safetyandeffectivenessofbolusinsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype2diabetesa1chievesubanalysis |