Cargando…

Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?

Membership of indigenous local community groups was protective against HIV for women, but not for men, in eastern Zimbabwe during the period of greatest risk reduction (1999–2004). We use four rounds of data from a population cohort to investigate: (1) the effects of membership of multiple community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregson, S., Nyamukapa, C., Schumacher, C., Magutshwa-Zitha, S., Skovdal, M., Yekeye, R., Sherr, L., Campbell, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.748171
_version_ 1782273887652806656
author Gregson, S.
Nyamukapa, C.
Schumacher, C.
Magutshwa-Zitha, S.
Skovdal, M.
Yekeye, R.
Sherr, L.
Campbell, C.
author_facet Gregson, S.
Nyamukapa, C.
Schumacher, C.
Magutshwa-Zitha, S.
Skovdal, M.
Yekeye, R.
Sherr, L.
Campbell, C.
author_sort Gregson, S.
collection PubMed
description Membership of indigenous local community groups was protective against HIV for women, but not for men, in eastern Zimbabwe during the period of greatest risk reduction (1999–2004). We use four rounds of data from a population cohort to investigate: (1) the effects of membership of multiple community groups during this period; (2) the effects of group membership in the following five years; and (3) the effects of characteristics of groups hypothesised to determine their effect on HIV risk. HIV incidence from 1998 to 2003 was 1.18% (95% CI: 0.78–1.79%), 0.48% (0.20–1.16%) and 1.13% (0.57–2.27%), in women participating in one, two and three or more community groups at baseline versus 2.19% (1.75–2.75%) in other women. In 2003–2005, 36.5% (versus 43% in 1998–2000) of women were members of community groups, 50% and 56% of which discussed HIV prevention and met with other groups, respectively; the corresponding figures for men were 24% (versus 28% in 1998–2000), 51% and 58%. From 2003 to 2008, prior membership of community groups was no longer protective against HIV for women (1.13% versus 1.29%, aIRR = 1.25;p = 0.23). However, membership of groups that provided social spaces for dialogue about HIV prevention (0.62% versus 1.01%, aIRR = 0.54; p = 0.28) and groups that interacted with other groups (0.65% versus 1.01%, aIRR = 0.51; p = 0.19) showed non-significant protective effects. For women, membership of a group with external sponsorship showed a non-significant increase in HIV risk compared to membership of unsponsored groups (adjusted odds ratio = 1.63, p = 0.48). Between 2003 and 2008, membership of community groups showed a non-significant tendency towards higher HIV risk for men (1.47% versus 0.94%, p = 0.23). Community responses contributed to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe. Sensitive engagement and support for local groups (including non-AIDS groups) to encourage dialogue on positive local responses to HIV and to challenge harmful social norms and incorrect information could enhance HIV prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3687248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36872482013-06-24 Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe? Gregson, S. Nyamukapa, C. Schumacher, C. Magutshwa-Zitha, S. Skovdal, M. Yekeye, R. Sherr, L. Campbell, C. AIDS Care Research Article Membership of indigenous local community groups was protective against HIV for women, but not for men, in eastern Zimbabwe during the period of greatest risk reduction (1999–2004). We use four rounds of data from a population cohort to investigate: (1) the effects of membership of multiple community groups during this period; (2) the effects of group membership in the following five years; and (3) the effects of characteristics of groups hypothesised to determine their effect on HIV risk. HIV incidence from 1998 to 2003 was 1.18% (95% CI: 0.78–1.79%), 0.48% (0.20–1.16%) and 1.13% (0.57–2.27%), in women participating in one, two and three or more community groups at baseline versus 2.19% (1.75–2.75%) in other women. In 2003–2005, 36.5% (versus 43% in 1998–2000) of women were members of community groups, 50% and 56% of which discussed HIV prevention and met with other groups, respectively; the corresponding figures for men were 24% (versus 28% in 1998–2000), 51% and 58%. From 2003 to 2008, prior membership of community groups was no longer protective against HIV for women (1.13% versus 1.29%, aIRR = 1.25;p = 0.23). However, membership of groups that provided social spaces for dialogue about HIV prevention (0.62% versus 1.01%, aIRR = 0.54; p = 0.28) and groups that interacted with other groups (0.65% versus 1.01%, aIRR = 0.51; p = 0.19) showed non-significant protective effects. For women, membership of a group with external sponsorship showed a non-significant increase in HIV risk compared to membership of unsponsored groups (adjusted odds ratio = 1.63, p = 0.48). Between 2003 and 2008, membership of community groups showed a non-significant tendency towards higher HIV risk for men (1.47% versus 0.94%, p = 0.23). Community responses contributed to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe. Sensitive engagement and support for local groups (including non-AIDS groups) to encourage dialogue on positive local responses to HIV and to challenge harmful social norms and incorrect information could enhance HIV prevention. Taylor & Francis 2013-06-09 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3687248/ /pubmed/23745635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.748171 Text en © 2013 The World Bank http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gregson, S.
Nyamukapa, C.
Schumacher, C.
Magutshwa-Zitha, S.
Skovdal, M.
Yekeye, R.
Sherr, L.
Campbell, C.
Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?
title Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?
title_full Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?
title_fullStr Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?
title_short Evidence for a contribution of the community response to HIV decline in eastern Zimbabwe?
title_sort evidence for a contribution of the community response to hiv decline in eastern zimbabwe?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.748171
work_keys_str_mv AT gregsons evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT nyamukapac evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT schumacherc evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT magutshwazithas evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT skovdalm evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT yekeyer evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT sherrl evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe
AT campbellc evidenceforacontributionofthecommunityresponsetohivdeclineineasternzimbabwe