Cargando…

Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin

OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes and insulin therapy with human insulin were usually instructed to use an interval of 20–30 min between the injection and meal. We examined the necessity of the injection-to-meal interval (IMI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and flexible insulin the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Nicolle, Frank, Thomas, Kloos, Christof, Lehmann, Thomas, Wolf, Gunter, Müller, Ulrich Alfons
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23340895
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1694
_version_ 1782273893372788736
author Müller, Nicolle
Frank, Thomas
Kloos, Christof
Lehmann, Thomas
Wolf, Gunter
Müller, Ulrich Alfons
author_facet Müller, Nicolle
Frank, Thomas
Kloos, Christof
Lehmann, Thomas
Wolf, Gunter
Müller, Ulrich Alfons
author_sort Müller, Nicolle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes and insulin therapy with human insulin were usually instructed to use an interval of 20–30 min between the injection and meal. We examined the necessity of the injection-to-meal interval (IMI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and flexible insulin therapy with human insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this randomized, open crossover trial, 100 patients with T2DM (47% men, mean age = 66.7 years) were randomized to the IMI first group (phase 1, IMI 20 min; phase 2, no IMI) or IMI last group (phase 1, no IMI; phase 2, IMI 20 min). The main outcome measures were HbA(1c), blood glucose profile, incidence of hypoglycemia, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and patient preference. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized to the IMI first group and 51 patients to the IMI last group. Omitting the IMI only slightly increases HbA(1c) (average intraindividual difference = 0.08% [95% CI 0.01–0.15]). Since the difference is not clinically relevant, a therapy without IMI is noninferior to its application (P < 0.001). In the secondary outcomes, the incidence of mild hypoglycemia also did not differ between no IMI and IMI significantly (mean of differences = −0.10, P = 0.493). No difference in the blood glucose profile of both groups was found. Treatment satisfaction increased markedly, by 8.08, if IMI was omitted (P < 0.001). The total score of the quality of life measure did not show differences between applying an IMI or not. Insulin therapy without IMI was preferred by 86.5% of patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An IMI for patients with T2DM and preprandial insulin therapy is not necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3687267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36872672014-07-01 Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin Müller, Nicolle Frank, Thomas Kloos, Christof Lehmann, Thomas Wolf, Gunter Müller, Ulrich Alfons Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes and insulin therapy with human insulin were usually instructed to use an interval of 20–30 min between the injection and meal. We examined the necessity of the injection-to-meal interval (IMI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and flexible insulin therapy with human insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this randomized, open crossover trial, 100 patients with T2DM (47% men, mean age = 66.7 years) were randomized to the IMI first group (phase 1, IMI 20 min; phase 2, no IMI) or IMI last group (phase 1, no IMI; phase 2, IMI 20 min). The main outcome measures were HbA(1c), blood glucose profile, incidence of hypoglycemia, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and patient preference. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized to the IMI first group and 51 patients to the IMI last group. Omitting the IMI only slightly increases HbA(1c) (average intraindividual difference = 0.08% [95% CI 0.01–0.15]). Since the difference is not clinically relevant, a therapy without IMI is noninferior to its application (P < 0.001). In the secondary outcomes, the incidence of mild hypoglycemia also did not differ between no IMI and IMI significantly (mean of differences = −0.10, P = 0.493). No difference in the blood glucose profile of both groups was found. Treatment satisfaction increased markedly, by 8.08, if IMI was omitted (P < 0.001). The total score of the quality of life measure did not show differences between applying an IMI or not. Insulin therapy without IMI was preferred by 86.5% of patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An IMI for patients with T2DM and preprandial insulin therapy is not necessary. American Diabetes Association 2013-07 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3687267/ /pubmed/23340895 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1694 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Müller, Nicolle
Frank, Thomas
Kloos, Christof
Lehmann, Thomas
Wolf, Gunter
Müller, Ulrich Alfons
Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin
title Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin
title_full Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin
title_fullStr Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin
title_short Randomized Crossover Study to Examine the Necessity of an Injection-to-Meal Interval in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Human Insulin
title_sort randomized crossover study to examine the necessity of an injection-to-meal interval in patients with type 2 diabetes and human insulin
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23340895
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1694
work_keys_str_mv AT mullernicolle randomizedcrossoverstudytoexaminethenecessityofaninjectiontomealintervalinpatientswithtype2diabetesandhumaninsulin
AT frankthomas randomizedcrossoverstudytoexaminethenecessityofaninjectiontomealintervalinpatientswithtype2diabetesandhumaninsulin
AT klooschristof randomizedcrossoverstudytoexaminethenecessityofaninjectiontomealintervalinpatientswithtype2diabetesandhumaninsulin
AT lehmannthomas randomizedcrossoverstudytoexaminethenecessityofaninjectiontomealintervalinpatientswithtype2diabetesandhumaninsulin
AT wolfgunter randomizedcrossoverstudytoexaminethenecessityofaninjectiontomealintervalinpatientswithtype2diabetesandhumaninsulin
AT mullerulrichalfons randomizedcrossoverstudytoexaminethenecessityofaninjectiontomealintervalinpatientswithtype2diabetesandhumaninsulin