Cargando…

Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of the hybrid technique of posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK-S). Materials and Methods: 71 eyes of 55 patients enrolled in a single-center study underwent posterior lamellar keratoplasty with a hybrid lamella DMEK-S implanted using a solution implantation techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studeny, Pavel, Sivekova, Deli, Liehneova, Katerina, Vokrojova, Magdalena, Kuchynka, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/254383
_version_ 1782273942042443776
author Studeny, Pavel
Sivekova, Deli
Liehneova, Katerina
Vokrojova, Magdalena
Kuchynka, Pavel
author_facet Studeny, Pavel
Sivekova, Deli
Liehneova, Katerina
Vokrojova, Magdalena
Kuchynka, Pavel
author_sort Studeny, Pavel
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of the hybrid technique of posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK-S). Materials and Methods: 71 eyes of 55 patients enrolled in a single-center study underwent posterior lamellar keratoplasty with a hybrid lamella DMEK-S implanted using a solution implantation technique, owing to endothelial dysfunction. The outcome measures studied were visual acuity and endothelial cell density. Results: The rate of endothelial cell loss caused by surgery was 43.8%. During followups, we observed the stabilization of postoperative findings, or at minimum a very low rate of corneal endothelial cell loss. The UCDVA and BCDVA dramatically improved postoperatively. The rebubbling rate in our group of patients was 61.9%. We replaced the lamella due to its failure or malfunction in 17 patients (23.9%). Conclusion: In summary, DMEK-S combines the advantages of DSEK/DSAEK and DMEK. The central zone of bare Descemet's membrane and endothelium allows for very good visual outcomes, and the peripheral rim allows for better manipulation of the lamella during implantation. It is an effective method of treating the endothelial dysfunction of various etiologies, but the high complication rate needs to be addressed before widespread implementation of the technique in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3687501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36875012013-07-09 Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S) Studeny, Pavel Sivekova, Deli Liehneova, Katerina Vokrojova, Magdalena Kuchynka, Pavel J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of the hybrid technique of posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK-S). Materials and Methods: 71 eyes of 55 patients enrolled in a single-center study underwent posterior lamellar keratoplasty with a hybrid lamella DMEK-S implanted using a solution implantation technique, owing to endothelial dysfunction. The outcome measures studied were visual acuity and endothelial cell density. Results: The rate of endothelial cell loss caused by surgery was 43.8%. During followups, we observed the stabilization of postoperative findings, or at minimum a very low rate of corneal endothelial cell loss. The UCDVA and BCDVA dramatically improved postoperatively. The rebubbling rate in our group of patients was 61.9%. We replaced the lamella due to its failure or malfunction in 17 patients (23.9%). Conclusion: In summary, DMEK-S combines the advantages of DSEK/DSAEK and DMEK. The central zone of bare Descemet's membrane and endothelium allows for very good visual outcomes, and the peripheral rim allows for better manipulation of the lamella during implantation. It is an effective method of treating the endothelial dysfunction of various etiologies, but the high complication rate needs to be addressed before widespread implementation of the technique in the future. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3687501/ /pubmed/23840937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/254383 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pavel Studeny et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Studeny, Pavel
Sivekova, Deli
Liehneova, Katerina
Vokrojova, Magdalena
Kuchynka, Pavel
Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
title Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
title_full Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
title_fullStr Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
title_short Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
title_sort hybrid technique of lamellar keratoplasty (dmek-s)
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/254383
work_keys_str_mv AT studenypavel hybridtechniqueoflamellarkeratoplastydmeks
AT sivekovadeli hybridtechniqueoflamellarkeratoplastydmeks
AT liehneovakaterina hybridtechniqueoflamellarkeratoplastydmeks
AT vokrojovamagdalena hybridtechniqueoflamellarkeratoplastydmeks
AT kuchynkapavel hybridtechniqueoflamellarkeratoplastydmeks