Cargando…

Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of two doses of a monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) against hospital admission for rotavirus in Bolivia. Design Case-control study. Setting Six hospitals in Bolivia, between March 2010 and June 2011. Participants 400 hospital admissions for rotavirus, 1200 no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Manish M, Patzi, Maritza, Pastor, Desiree, Nina, Aleida, Roca, Yelin, Alvarez, Leovigildo, Iniguez, Volga, Rivera, Rosario, Tam, Ka Ian, Quaye, Osbourne, Bowen, Michael, Parashar, Umesh, De Oliveira, Lucia Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23783434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3726
_version_ 1782273944986845184
author Patel, Manish M
Patzi, Maritza
Pastor, Desiree
Nina, Aleida
Roca, Yelin
Alvarez, Leovigildo
Iniguez, Volga
Rivera, Rosario
Tam, Ka Ian
Quaye, Osbourne
Bowen, Michael
Parashar, Umesh
De Oliveira, Lucia Helena
author_facet Patel, Manish M
Patzi, Maritza
Pastor, Desiree
Nina, Aleida
Roca, Yelin
Alvarez, Leovigildo
Iniguez, Volga
Rivera, Rosario
Tam, Ka Ian
Quaye, Osbourne
Bowen, Michael
Parashar, Umesh
De Oliveira, Lucia Helena
author_sort Patel, Manish M
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of two doses of a monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) against hospital admission for rotavirus in Bolivia. Design Case-control study. Setting Six hospitals in Bolivia, between March 2010 and June 2011. Participants 400 hospital admissions for rotavirus, 1200 non-diarrhea hospital controls, and 718 rotavirus negative hospital controls. Main outcome measures Odds of antecedent vaccination between case patients and controls; effectiveness of vaccination ((1–adjusted odds ratio)×100), adjusted for age and other confounders; and stratified effectiveness by dose, disease severity, age group, and serotype. Results In comparison with non-diarrhea controls, case patients were more likely to be male and attend day care but less likely to have chronic underlying illness, higher level maternal education, and telephones and computers in their home. Rotavirus negative controls were somewhat more similar to case patients but also were more likely to be male and attend day care and less likely to have higher level maternal education and computers in their homes. The adjusted effectiveness of RV1 against hospital admission for rotavirus was 69% (95% confidence interval 54% to 79%) with rotavirus negative controls and 77% (65% to 84%) with non-diarrhea controls. The effectiveness of one dose of RV1 was 36% and 56%, respectively. With both control groups, protection was sustained through two years of life, with similar efficacy against hospital admission among children under 1 year (64% and 77%) and over 1 year of age (72% and 76%). RV1 provided significant protection against diverse serotypes, partially and fully heterotypic to the G1P[8] vaccine. Effectiveness using the two control groups was 80% and 85% against G9P[8], 74% and 93%% against G3P[8], 59% and 69% against G2P[4], and 80% and 87% against G9P[6] strains. Conclusion The monovalent rotavirus vaccine conferred high protection against hospital admission for diarrhea due to rotavirus in Bolivian children. Protection was sustained through two years of life against diverse serotypes different from the vaccine strain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3687514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36875142013-06-24 Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study Patel, Manish M Patzi, Maritza Pastor, Desiree Nina, Aleida Roca, Yelin Alvarez, Leovigildo Iniguez, Volga Rivera, Rosario Tam, Ka Ian Quaye, Osbourne Bowen, Michael Parashar, Umesh De Oliveira, Lucia Helena BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of two doses of a monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) against hospital admission for rotavirus in Bolivia. Design Case-control study. Setting Six hospitals in Bolivia, between March 2010 and June 2011. Participants 400 hospital admissions for rotavirus, 1200 non-diarrhea hospital controls, and 718 rotavirus negative hospital controls. Main outcome measures Odds of antecedent vaccination between case patients and controls; effectiveness of vaccination ((1–adjusted odds ratio)×100), adjusted for age and other confounders; and stratified effectiveness by dose, disease severity, age group, and serotype. Results In comparison with non-diarrhea controls, case patients were more likely to be male and attend day care but less likely to have chronic underlying illness, higher level maternal education, and telephones and computers in their home. Rotavirus negative controls were somewhat more similar to case patients but also were more likely to be male and attend day care and less likely to have higher level maternal education and computers in their homes. The adjusted effectiveness of RV1 against hospital admission for rotavirus was 69% (95% confidence interval 54% to 79%) with rotavirus negative controls and 77% (65% to 84%) with non-diarrhea controls. The effectiveness of one dose of RV1 was 36% and 56%, respectively. With both control groups, protection was sustained through two years of life, with similar efficacy against hospital admission among children under 1 year (64% and 77%) and over 1 year of age (72% and 76%). RV1 provided significant protection against diverse serotypes, partially and fully heterotypic to the G1P[8] vaccine. Effectiveness using the two control groups was 80% and 85% against G9P[8], 74% and 93%% against G3P[8], 59% and 69% against G2P[4], and 80% and 87% against G9P[6] strains. Conclusion The monovalent rotavirus vaccine conferred high protection against hospital admission for diarrhea due to rotavirus in Bolivian children. Protection was sustained through two years of life against diverse serotypes different from the vaccine strain. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3687514/ /pubmed/23783434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3726 Text en © Patel et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Patel, Manish M
Patzi, Maritza
Pastor, Desiree
Nina, Aleida
Roca, Yelin
Alvarez, Leovigildo
Iniguez, Volga
Rivera, Rosario
Tam, Ka Ian
Quaye, Osbourne
Bowen, Michael
Parashar, Umesh
De Oliveira, Lucia Helena
Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study
title Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study
title_full Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study
title_short Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in Bolivia: case-control study
title_sort effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in bolivia: case-control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23783434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3726
work_keys_str_mv AT patelmanishm effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT patzimaritza effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT pastordesiree effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT ninaaleida effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT rocayelin effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT alvarezleovigildo effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT iniguezvolga effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT riverarosario effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT tamkaian effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT quayeosbourne effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT bowenmichael effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT parasharumesh effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy
AT deoliveiraluciahelena effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinboliviacasecontrolstudy