Cargando…

Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus

BACKGROUND: There is medium correlation between the current anthropometric method and the radiography in the angle of hallux valgus (AoH) measurement, so this study aimed at designing a reliable and more accurate approach to measure the AoH (AoH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen age, body weight, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Jin, Hlavacek, Petr, Xu, Bo, Chen, Wuyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23798759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.109875
_version_ 1782274010679083008
author Zhou, Jin
Hlavacek, Petr
Xu, Bo
Chen, Wuyong
author_facet Zhou, Jin
Hlavacek, Petr
Xu, Bo
Chen, Wuyong
author_sort Zhou, Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is medium correlation between the current anthropometric method and the radiography in the angle of hallux valgus (AoH) measurement, so this study aimed at designing a reliable and more accurate approach to measure the AoH (AoH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen age, body weight, and height matched male students were included and those with foot disorders, deformities, or injuries were excluded from the study. The dorsal protrusions of the first metatarsal and the hallux were marked by palpating from three experienced observers; then their barefoot model in standing was collected by a three dimensional laser scanning system. The AoH was defined in the X-Y plane by the angle between the line joining the marks of centre of head and centre of base of metatarsal shaft and the one connecting the marks of the centre of metatarsal head and the hallux. The same procedure was repeated a week later. Besides, other measures based on the footprint, outline, and the radiography were also available for comparisons. Paired t-test, linear regression, and reliability analysis were applied for statistical analysis with significant level of 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were no significant differences recorded between the new method and the radiographic method (P = 0.069). The AoH was superior to the methods of footprint and outline and it displayed a relative higher correlation with the radiographic method (r = 0.94, r(2) = 0.89). Moreover both the inter and intraobserver reliabilities of this method were proved to be good. CONCLUSION: This new method can be used for hallux valgus inspection and evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3687905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36879052013-06-24 Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus Zhou, Jin Hlavacek, Petr Xu, Bo Chen, Wuyong Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: There is medium correlation between the current anthropometric method and the radiography in the angle of hallux valgus (AoH) measurement, so this study aimed at designing a reliable and more accurate approach to measure the AoH (AoH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen age, body weight, and height matched male students were included and those with foot disorders, deformities, or injuries were excluded from the study. The dorsal protrusions of the first metatarsal and the hallux were marked by palpating from three experienced observers; then their barefoot model in standing was collected by a three dimensional laser scanning system. The AoH was defined in the X-Y plane by the angle between the line joining the marks of centre of head and centre of base of metatarsal shaft and the one connecting the marks of the centre of metatarsal head and the hallux. The same procedure was repeated a week later. Besides, other measures based on the footprint, outline, and the radiography were also available for comparisons. Paired t-test, linear regression, and reliability analysis were applied for statistical analysis with significant level of 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were no significant differences recorded between the new method and the radiographic method (P = 0.069). The AoH was superior to the methods of footprint and outline and it displayed a relative higher correlation with the radiographic method (r = 0.94, r(2) = 0.89). Moreover both the inter and intraobserver reliabilities of this method were proved to be good. CONCLUSION: This new method can be used for hallux valgus inspection and evaluation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3687905/ /pubmed/23798759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.109875 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhou, Jin
Hlavacek, Petr
Xu, Bo
Chen, Wuyong
Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
title Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
title_full Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
title_fullStr Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
title_full_unstemmed Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
title_short Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
title_sort approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23798759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.109875
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujin approachformeasuringtheangleofhalluxvalgus
AT hlavacekpetr approachformeasuringtheangleofhalluxvalgus
AT xubo approachformeasuringtheangleofhalluxvalgus
AT chenwuyong approachformeasuringtheangleofhalluxvalgus