Cargando…

Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape

Oak decline is a process induced by complex interactions of predisposing factors, inciting factors, and contributing factors operating at tree, stand, and landscape scales. It has greatly altered species composition and stand structure in affected areas. Thinning, clearcutting, and group selection a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wen J., He, Hong S., Spetich, Martin A., Shifley, Stephen R., Thompson III, Frank R., Fraser, Jacob S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3688961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066713
_version_ 1782274205564272640
author Wang, Wen J.
He, Hong S.
Spetich, Martin A.
Shifley, Stephen R.
Thompson III, Frank R.
Fraser, Jacob S.
author_facet Wang, Wen J.
He, Hong S.
Spetich, Martin A.
Shifley, Stephen R.
Thompson III, Frank R.
Fraser, Jacob S.
author_sort Wang, Wen J.
collection PubMed
description Oak decline is a process induced by complex interactions of predisposing factors, inciting factors, and contributing factors operating at tree, stand, and landscape scales. It has greatly altered species composition and stand structure in affected areas. Thinning, clearcutting, and group selection are widely adopted harvest alternatives for reducing forest vulnerability to oak decline by removing susceptible species and declining trees. However, the long-term, landscape-scale effects of these different harvest alternatives are not well studied because of the limited availability of experimental data. In this study, we applied a forest landscape model in combination with field studies to evaluate the effects of the three harvest alternatives on mitigating oak decline in a Central Hardwood Forest landscape. Results showed that the potential oak decline in high risk sites decreased strongly in the next five decades irrespective of harvest alternatives. This is because oak decline is a natural process and forest succession (e.g., high tree mortality resulting from intense competition) would eventually lead to the decrease in oak decline in this area. However, forest harvesting did play a role in mitigating oak decline and the effectiveness varied among the three harvest alternatives. The group selection and clearcutting alternatives were most effective in mitigating oak decline in the short and medium terms, respectively. The long-term effects of the three harvest alternatives on mitigating oak decline became less discernible as the role of succession increased. The thinning alternative had the highest biomass retention over time, followed by the group selection and clearcutting alternatives. The group selection alternative that balanced treatment effects and retaining biomass was the most viable alternative for managing oak decline. Insights from this study may be useful in developing effective and informed forest harvesting plans for managing oak decline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3688961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36889612013-07-02 Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape Wang, Wen J. He, Hong S. Spetich, Martin A. Shifley, Stephen R. Thompson III, Frank R. Fraser, Jacob S. PLoS One Research Article Oak decline is a process induced by complex interactions of predisposing factors, inciting factors, and contributing factors operating at tree, stand, and landscape scales. It has greatly altered species composition and stand structure in affected areas. Thinning, clearcutting, and group selection are widely adopted harvest alternatives for reducing forest vulnerability to oak decline by removing susceptible species and declining trees. However, the long-term, landscape-scale effects of these different harvest alternatives are not well studied because of the limited availability of experimental data. In this study, we applied a forest landscape model in combination with field studies to evaluate the effects of the three harvest alternatives on mitigating oak decline in a Central Hardwood Forest landscape. Results showed that the potential oak decline in high risk sites decreased strongly in the next five decades irrespective of harvest alternatives. This is because oak decline is a natural process and forest succession (e.g., high tree mortality resulting from intense competition) would eventually lead to the decrease in oak decline in this area. However, forest harvesting did play a role in mitigating oak decline and the effectiveness varied among the three harvest alternatives. The group selection and clearcutting alternatives were most effective in mitigating oak decline in the short and medium terms, respectively. The long-term effects of the three harvest alternatives on mitigating oak decline became less discernible as the role of succession increased. The thinning alternative had the highest biomass retention over time, followed by the group selection and clearcutting alternatives. The group selection alternative that balanced treatment effects and retaining biomass was the most viable alternative for managing oak decline. Insights from this study may be useful in developing effective and informed forest harvesting plans for managing oak decline. Public Library of Science 2013-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3688961/ /pubmed/23825560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066713 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Wen J.
He, Hong S.
Spetich, Martin A.
Shifley, Stephen R.
Thompson III, Frank R.
Fraser, Jacob S.
Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape
title Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape
title_full Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape
title_fullStr Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape
title_short Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape
title_sort modeling the effects of harvest alternatives on mitigating oak decline in a central hardwood forest landscape
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3688961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066713
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwenj modelingtheeffectsofharvestalternativesonmitigatingoakdeclineinacentralhardwoodforestlandscape
AT hehongs modelingtheeffectsofharvestalternativesonmitigatingoakdeclineinacentralhardwoodforestlandscape
AT spetichmartina modelingtheeffectsofharvestalternativesonmitigatingoakdeclineinacentralhardwoodforestlandscape
AT shifleystephenr modelingtheeffectsofharvestalternativesonmitigatingoakdeclineinacentralhardwoodforestlandscape
AT thompsoniiifrankr modelingtheeffectsofharvestalternativesonmitigatingoakdeclineinacentralhardwoodforestlandscape
AT fraserjacobs modelingtheeffectsofharvestalternativesonmitigatingoakdeclineinacentralhardwoodforestlandscape