Cargando…

Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution

Patch context is a way to describe the effect that the surroundings exert on a landscape patch. Despite anthropogenic context alteration may affect species distributions by reducing the accessibility to suitable patches, species distribution modelling have rarely accounted for its effects explicitly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangiacotti, Marco, Scali, Stefano, Sacchi, Roberto, Bassu, Lara, Nulchis, Valeria, Corti, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3688972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067573
_version_ 1782274208096583680
author Mangiacotti, Marco
Scali, Stefano
Sacchi, Roberto
Bassu, Lara
Nulchis, Valeria
Corti, Claudia
author_facet Mangiacotti, Marco
Scali, Stefano
Sacchi, Roberto
Bassu, Lara
Nulchis, Valeria
Corti, Claudia
author_sort Mangiacotti, Marco
collection PubMed
description Patch context is a way to describe the effect that the surroundings exert on a landscape patch. Despite anthropogenic context alteration may affect species distributions by reducing the accessibility to suitable patches, species distribution modelling have rarely accounted for its effects explicitly. We propose a general framework to statistically detect the occurrence and the extent of such a factor, by combining presence-only data, spatial distribution models and information-theoretic model selection procedures. After having established the spatial resolution of the analysis on the basis of the species characteristics, a measure of anthropogenic alteration that can be quantified at increasing distance from each patch has to be defined. Then the distribution of the species is modelled under competing hypotheses: H(0), assumes that the distribution is uninfluenced by the anthropogenic variables; H(1), assumes the effect of alteration at the species scale (resolution); and H(2), H(3) … H(n) add the effect of context alteration at increasing radii. Models are compared using the Akaike Information Criterion to establish the best hypothesis, and consequently the occurrence (if any) and the spatial scale of the anthropogenic effect. As a study case we analysed the distribution data of two insular lizards (one endemic and one naturalised) using four alternative hypotheses: no alteration (H(0)), alteration at the species scale (H(1)), alteration at two context scales (H(2) and H(3)). H(2) and H(3) performed better than H(0) and H(1), highlighting the importance of context alteration. H(2) performed better than H(3), setting the spatial scale of the context at 1 km. The two species respond differently to context alteration, the introduced lizard being more tolerant than the endemic one. The proposed approach supplies reliably and interpretable results, uses easily available data on species distribution, and allows the assessing of the spatial scale at which human disturbance produces the heaviest effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3688972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36889722013-07-02 Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution Mangiacotti, Marco Scali, Stefano Sacchi, Roberto Bassu, Lara Nulchis, Valeria Corti, Claudia PLoS One Research Article Patch context is a way to describe the effect that the surroundings exert on a landscape patch. Despite anthropogenic context alteration may affect species distributions by reducing the accessibility to suitable patches, species distribution modelling have rarely accounted for its effects explicitly. We propose a general framework to statistically detect the occurrence and the extent of such a factor, by combining presence-only data, spatial distribution models and information-theoretic model selection procedures. After having established the spatial resolution of the analysis on the basis of the species characteristics, a measure of anthropogenic alteration that can be quantified at increasing distance from each patch has to be defined. Then the distribution of the species is modelled under competing hypotheses: H(0), assumes that the distribution is uninfluenced by the anthropogenic variables; H(1), assumes the effect of alteration at the species scale (resolution); and H(2), H(3) … H(n) add the effect of context alteration at increasing radii. Models are compared using the Akaike Information Criterion to establish the best hypothesis, and consequently the occurrence (if any) and the spatial scale of the anthropogenic effect. As a study case we analysed the distribution data of two insular lizards (one endemic and one naturalised) using four alternative hypotheses: no alteration (H(0)), alteration at the species scale (H(1)), alteration at two context scales (H(2) and H(3)). H(2) and H(3) performed better than H(0) and H(1), highlighting the importance of context alteration. H(2) performed better than H(3), setting the spatial scale of the context at 1 km. The two species respond differently to context alteration, the introduced lizard being more tolerant than the endemic one. The proposed approach supplies reliably and interpretable results, uses easily available data on species distribution, and allows the assessing of the spatial scale at which human disturbance produces the heaviest effects. Public Library of Science 2013-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3688972/ /pubmed/23825669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067573 Text en © 2013 Mangiacotti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mangiacotti, Marco
Scali, Stefano
Sacchi, Roberto
Bassu, Lara
Nulchis, Valeria
Corti, Claudia
Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution
title Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution
title_full Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution
title_fullStr Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution
title_short Assessing the Spatial Scale Effect of Anthropogenic Factors on Species Distribution
title_sort assessing the spatial scale effect of anthropogenic factors on species distribution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3688972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067573
work_keys_str_mv AT mangiacottimarco assessingthespatialscaleeffectofanthropogenicfactorsonspeciesdistribution
AT scalistefano assessingthespatialscaleeffectofanthropogenicfactorsonspeciesdistribution
AT sacchiroberto assessingthespatialscaleeffectofanthropogenicfactorsonspeciesdistribution
AT bassulara assessingthespatialscaleeffectofanthropogenicfactorsonspeciesdistribution
AT nulchisvaleria assessingthespatialscaleeffectofanthropogenicfactorsonspeciesdistribution
AT corticlaudia assessingthespatialscaleeffectofanthropogenicfactorsonspeciesdistribution