Cargando…
The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction
PURPOSE: The authors analysed the distribution of c-kit-positive interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) in obstructed ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) and its age-related changes. METHODS: Twenty specimens were obtained from children with intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), at the average a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23632879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0454-7 |
_version_ | 1782274257564205056 |
---|---|
author | Apoznanski, Wojciech Koleda, Piotr Wozniak, Zdzislaw Rusiecki, Leslaw Szydelko, Tomasz Kalka, Dariusz Pilecki, Witold |
author_facet | Apoznanski, Wojciech Koleda, Piotr Wozniak, Zdzislaw Rusiecki, Leslaw Szydelko, Tomasz Kalka, Dariusz Pilecki, Witold |
author_sort | Apoznanski, Wojciech |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The authors analysed the distribution of c-kit-positive interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) in obstructed ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) and its age-related changes. METHODS: Twenty specimens were obtained from children with intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), at the average age of 8.1 years (8 months–16.8 years), fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Five control samples were taken from children at the average age of 2.3 years (2.4 months–7.4 years). All specimens were analysed by the immunohistochemistry test with light microscopy with respect to c-kit expression. The distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs in the two groups was compared and the correlation between the distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs and the patients’ age in UPJO cases was analysed. The results were examined by Yates’ χ(2) test, Mann–Whitney U test, and t test for Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs between UPJO and the control group. No correlation was established between the age of patients with UPJO and the distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs. CONCLUSION: No distributional difference found in obstructed and unobstructed UPJ seems to indicate that UPJO is not associated with anomalous distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs. Age-related changes in the expression of c-kit-positive ICCs are equally distributed in obstructed UPJ. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3689466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36894662013-06-24 The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction Apoznanski, Wojciech Koleda, Piotr Wozniak, Zdzislaw Rusiecki, Leslaw Szydelko, Tomasz Kalka, Dariusz Pilecki, Witold Int Urol Nephrol Urology - Original Paper PURPOSE: The authors analysed the distribution of c-kit-positive interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) in obstructed ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) and its age-related changes. METHODS: Twenty specimens were obtained from children with intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), at the average age of 8.1 years (8 months–16.8 years), fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Five control samples were taken from children at the average age of 2.3 years (2.4 months–7.4 years). All specimens were analysed by the immunohistochemistry test with light microscopy with respect to c-kit expression. The distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs in the two groups was compared and the correlation between the distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs and the patients’ age in UPJO cases was analysed. The results were examined by Yates’ χ(2) test, Mann–Whitney U test, and t test for Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs between UPJO and the control group. No correlation was established between the age of patients with UPJO and the distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs. CONCLUSION: No distributional difference found in obstructed and unobstructed UPJ seems to indicate that UPJO is not associated with anomalous distribution of c-kit-positive ICCs. Age-related changes in the expression of c-kit-positive ICCs are equally distributed in obstructed UPJ. Springer Netherlands 2013-04-30 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3689466/ /pubmed/23632879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0454-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Urology - Original Paper Apoznanski, Wojciech Koleda, Piotr Wozniak, Zdzislaw Rusiecki, Leslaw Szydelko, Tomasz Kalka, Dariusz Pilecki, Witold The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title | The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_full | The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_fullStr | The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_short | The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_sort | distribution of interstitial cells of cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
topic | Urology - Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23632879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0454-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT apoznanskiwojciech thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT koledapiotr thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT wozniakzdzislaw thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT rusieckileslaw thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT szydelkotomasz thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT kalkadariusz thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT pileckiwitold thedistributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT apoznanskiwojciech distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT koledapiotr distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT wozniakzdzislaw distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT rusieckileslaw distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT szydelkotomasz distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT kalkadariusz distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT pileckiwitold distributionofinterstitialcellsofcajalincongenitalureteropelvicjunctionobstruction |