Cargando…

CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis

BACKGROUND: Traditional inflammatory markers are generally unhelpful in discerning septic arthritis from inflammatory joint disease due to their lack of specificity. We wished to explore the discriminatory power of the novel inflammatory marker, Fc-gamma-receptor type 1, CD64, in patients presenting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oppegaard, Oddvar, Skodvin, Brita, Halse, Anne-Kristine, Langeland, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23783182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-278
_version_ 1782274270024433664
author Oppegaard, Oddvar
Skodvin, Brita
Halse, Anne-Kristine
Langeland, Nina
author_facet Oppegaard, Oddvar
Skodvin, Brita
Halse, Anne-Kristine
Langeland, Nina
author_sort Oppegaard, Oddvar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional inflammatory markers are generally unhelpful in discerning septic arthritis from inflammatory joint disease due to their lack of specificity. We wished to explore the discriminatory power of the novel inflammatory marker, Fc-gamma-receptor type 1, CD64, in patients presenting with acute arthritis. METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively in the time period June 2009 to December 2011. Thirty-six patients presenting with an acute flare of chronic rheumatic arthritis, 31 with crystal-induced arthritis and 23 with septic arthritis were included. Traditional inflammatory markers, CD64 and procalcitonin (PCT) were measured and their diagnostic abilities were compared. RESULTS: CD64 and PCT both demonstrated a specificity of 98%, but poor sensitivities of 59% and 52%, respectively. White blood cell count (WBC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) did not have significant discriminatory power, while C-reactive protein (CRP) proved to have the best diagnostic accuracy as measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC 0.92, 95% confidence-interval 0.87-0.98). Subgroup analysis excluding patients with septic arthritis without concurrent bacteremia, and likewise exclusion of the patients with septic arthritis caused by coagulase negative staphylococci, both improved the diagnostic accuracy of CD64 and PCT, but not of WBC and CRP. CONCLUSIONS: CD64 and PCT are highly specific for infectious disease, but they predominantly measure bacteremia. Their use in hospital practice has yet to be defined, and especially so in localized infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3689602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36896022013-06-22 CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis Oppegaard, Oddvar Skodvin, Brita Halse, Anne-Kristine Langeland, Nina BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditional inflammatory markers are generally unhelpful in discerning septic arthritis from inflammatory joint disease due to their lack of specificity. We wished to explore the discriminatory power of the novel inflammatory marker, Fc-gamma-receptor type 1, CD64, in patients presenting with acute arthritis. METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively in the time period June 2009 to December 2011. Thirty-six patients presenting with an acute flare of chronic rheumatic arthritis, 31 with crystal-induced arthritis and 23 with septic arthritis were included. Traditional inflammatory markers, CD64 and procalcitonin (PCT) were measured and their diagnostic abilities were compared. RESULTS: CD64 and PCT both demonstrated a specificity of 98%, but poor sensitivities of 59% and 52%, respectively. White blood cell count (WBC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) did not have significant discriminatory power, while C-reactive protein (CRP) proved to have the best diagnostic accuracy as measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC 0.92, 95% confidence-interval 0.87-0.98). Subgroup analysis excluding patients with septic arthritis without concurrent bacteremia, and likewise exclusion of the patients with septic arthritis caused by coagulase negative staphylococci, both improved the diagnostic accuracy of CD64 and PCT, but not of WBC and CRP. CONCLUSIONS: CD64 and PCT are highly specific for infectious disease, but they predominantly measure bacteremia. Their use in hospital practice has yet to be defined, and especially so in localized infections. BioMed Central 2013-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3689602/ /pubmed/23783182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-278 Text en Copyright © 2013 Oppegaard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oppegaard, Oddvar
Skodvin, Brita
Halse, Anne-Kristine
Langeland, Nina
CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
title CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
title_full CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
title_fullStr CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
title_full_unstemmed CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
title_short CD64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
title_sort cd64 as a potential biomarker in septic arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23783182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-278
work_keys_str_mv AT oppegaardoddvar cd64asapotentialbiomarkerinsepticarthritis
AT skodvinbrita cd64asapotentialbiomarkerinsepticarthritis
AT halseannekristine cd64asapotentialbiomarkerinsepticarthritis
AT langelandnina cd64asapotentialbiomarkerinsepticarthritis