Cargando…

Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey

France implemented a comprehensive smoke-free law in two phases: Phase 1 (February 2007) banned smoking in workplaces, shopping centres, airports, train stations, hospitals, and schools; Phase 2 (January 2008) banned smoking in hospitality venues (bars, restaurants, hotels, casinos, nightclubs). Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fong, Geoffrey T., Craig, Lorraine V., Guignard, Romain, Nagelhout, Gera E., Tait, Megan K., Driezen, Pete, Kennedy, Ryan David, Boudreau, Christian, Wilquin, Jean-Louis, Deutsch, Antoine, Beck, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066692
_version_ 1782274293376221184
author Fong, Geoffrey T.
Craig, Lorraine V.
Guignard, Romain
Nagelhout, Gera E.
Tait, Megan K.
Driezen, Pete
Kennedy, Ryan David
Boudreau, Christian
Wilquin, Jean-Louis
Deutsch, Antoine
Beck, François
author_facet Fong, Geoffrey T.
Craig, Lorraine V.
Guignard, Romain
Nagelhout, Gera E.
Tait, Megan K.
Driezen, Pete
Kennedy, Ryan David
Boudreau, Christian
Wilquin, Jean-Louis
Deutsch, Antoine
Beck, François
author_sort Fong, Geoffrey T.
collection PubMed
description France implemented a comprehensive smoke-free law in two phases: Phase 1 (February 2007) banned smoking in workplaces, shopping centres, airports, train stations, hospitals, and schools; Phase 2 (January 2008) banned smoking in hospitality venues (bars, restaurants, hotels, casinos, nightclubs). This paper evaluates France’s smoke-free law based on the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project in France (the ITC France Project), which conducted a cohort survey of approximately 1,500 smokers and 500 non-smokers before the implementation of the laws (Wave 1) and two waves after the implementation (Waves 2 and 3). Results show that the smoke-free law led to a very significant and near-total elimination of observed smoking in key venues such as bars (from 94–97% to 4%) and restaurants (from 60–71% to 2–3%) at Wave 2, which was sustained four years later (6–8% in bars; 1–2% in restaurants). The reduction in self-reported smoking by smoking respondents was nearly identical to the effects shown in observed smoking. Observed smoking in workplaces declined significantly after the law (from 41–48% to 18–20%), which continued to decline at Wave 3 (to 14–15%). Support for the smoke-free laws increased significantly after their implementation and continued to increase at Wave 3 (p<.001 among smokers for bars and restaurants; p<.001 among smokers and p = .003 for non-smokers for workplaces). The findings demonstrate that smoke-free policies that are implemented in ways consistent with the Guidelines for Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) lead to substantial and sustained reductions in indoor smoking while also leading to high levels of support by the public. Moreover, contrary to arguments by opponents of smoke-free laws, smoking in the home did not increase after the law was implemented and prevalence of smoke-free homes among smokers increased from 23.2% before the law to 37.2% 5 years after the law.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3689708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36897082013-06-26 Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey Fong, Geoffrey T. Craig, Lorraine V. Guignard, Romain Nagelhout, Gera E. Tait, Megan K. Driezen, Pete Kennedy, Ryan David Boudreau, Christian Wilquin, Jean-Louis Deutsch, Antoine Beck, François PLoS One Research Article France implemented a comprehensive smoke-free law in two phases: Phase 1 (February 2007) banned smoking in workplaces, shopping centres, airports, train stations, hospitals, and schools; Phase 2 (January 2008) banned smoking in hospitality venues (bars, restaurants, hotels, casinos, nightclubs). This paper evaluates France’s smoke-free law based on the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project in France (the ITC France Project), which conducted a cohort survey of approximately 1,500 smokers and 500 non-smokers before the implementation of the laws (Wave 1) and two waves after the implementation (Waves 2 and 3). Results show that the smoke-free law led to a very significant and near-total elimination of observed smoking in key venues such as bars (from 94–97% to 4%) and restaurants (from 60–71% to 2–3%) at Wave 2, which was sustained four years later (6–8% in bars; 1–2% in restaurants). The reduction in self-reported smoking by smoking respondents was nearly identical to the effects shown in observed smoking. Observed smoking in workplaces declined significantly after the law (from 41–48% to 18–20%), which continued to decline at Wave 3 (to 14–15%). Support for the smoke-free laws increased significantly after their implementation and continued to increase at Wave 3 (p<.001 among smokers for bars and restaurants; p<.001 among smokers and p = .003 for non-smokers for workplaces). The findings demonstrate that smoke-free policies that are implemented in ways consistent with the Guidelines for Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) lead to substantial and sustained reductions in indoor smoking while also leading to high levels of support by the public. Moreover, contrary to arguments by opponents of smoke-free laws, smoking in the home did not increase after the law was implemented and prevalence of smoke-free homes among smokers increased from 23.2% before the law to 37.2% 5 years after the law. Public Library of Science 2013-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3689708/ /pubmed/23805265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066692 Text en © 2013 Fong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fong, Geoffrey T.
Craig, Lorraine V.
Guignard, Romain
Nagelhout, Gera E.
Tait, Megan K.
Driezen, Pete
Kennedy, Ryan David
Boudreau, Christian
Wilquin, Jean-Louis
Deutsch, Antoine
Beck, François
Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey
title Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey
title_full Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey
title_fullStr Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey
title_short Evaluating the Effectiveness of France’s Indoor Smoke-Free Law 1 Year and 5 Years after Implementation: Findings from the ITC France Survey
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of france’s indoor smoke-free law 1 year and 5 years after implementation: findings from the itc france survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066692
work_keys_str_mv AT fonggeoffreyt evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT craiglorrainev evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT guignardromain evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT nagelhoutgerae evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT taitmegank evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT driezenpete evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT kennedyryandavid evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT boudreauchristian evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT wilquinjeanlouis evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT deutschantoine evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey
AT beckfrancois evaluatingtheeffectivenessoffrancesindoorsmokefreelaw1yearand5yearsafterimplementationfindingsfromtheitcfrancesurvey