Cargando…

Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

BACKGROUND: Hepatic lesions often present diagnostic connundrums with conventional MR techniques. Hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced imaging with gadoxetic acid can aid in the characterization of such lesions. However, quantitative measures describing late-phase enhancement must be assessed relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morelli, John N., Michaely, Henrik J., Meyer, Mathias M., Rustemeyer, Thassilo, Schoenberg, Stefan O., Attenberger, Ulrike I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061898
_version_ 1782274306675310592
author Morelli, John N.
Michaely, Henrik J.
Meyer, Mathias M.
Rustemeyer, Thassilo
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Attenberger, Ulrike I.
author_facet Morelli, John N.
Michaely, Henrik J.
Meyer, Mathias M.
Rustemeyer, Thassilo
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Attenberger, Ulrike I.
author_sort Morelli, John N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatic lesions often present diagnostic connundrums with conventional MR techniques. Hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced imaging with gadoxetic acid can aid in the characterization of such lesions. However, quantitative measures describing late-phase enhancement must be assessed relative to their accuracy of hepatic lesion classification. Purpose: To compare quantitative parameters in gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase imaging versus apparent diffusion coefficients in hepatic lesion characterization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 57 patients with focal hepatic lesions on gadoxetic acid MR were included. Lesion enhancement at standard post-contrast time points and in the hepatobiliary phase (HB; 15 and 25 minutes post-contrast) was assessed via calculation of contrast (CR) and enhancement ratios (ER). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were also obtained. Values for these parameters were compared among lesions and ROC analyses performed. Results: HB enhancement was greatest with FNH and adenomas. HB ER parameters but not HB CR could distinguish HCC from benign entities (0.9 ER ROC AUC versus 0.5 CR ROC AUC). There was no statistically significant difference found between the 15 and 25 minutes HB time points in detection of any lesion (p>0.4). ADC values were statistically significantly higher with hemangiomas (p<0.05) without greater accuracy in lesion detection relative to HB phase parameters. CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MR characterizes focal hepatic lesions more accurately than ADC and conventional dynamic post-contrast time point enhancement parameters. ER values are generally superior to CR. No discernible benefit of 25 minute versus 15 minute delayed imaging is demonstrated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3689764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36897642013-06-26 Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Morelli, John N. Michaely, Henrik J. Meyer, Mathias M. Rustemeyer, Thassilo Schoenberg, Stefan O. Attenberger, Ulrike I. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Hepatic lesions often present diagnostic connundrums with conventional MR techniques. Hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced imaging with gadoxetic acid can aid in the characterization of such lesions. However, quantitative measures describing late-phase enhancement must be assessed relative to their accuracy of hepatic lesion classification. Purpose: To compare quantitative parameters in gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase imaging versus apparent diffusion coefficients in hepatic lesion characterization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 57 patients with focal hepatic lesions on gadoxetic acid MR were included. Lesion enhancement at standard post-contrast time points and in the hepatobiliary phase (HB; 15 and 25 minutes post-contrast) was assessed via calculation of contrast (CR) and enhancement ratios (ER). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were also obtained. Values for these parameters were compared among lesions and ROC analyses performed. Results: HB enhancement was greatest with FNH and adenomas. HB ER parameters but not HB CR could distinguish HCC from benign entities (0.9 ER ROC AUC versus 0.5 CR ROC AUC). There was no statistically significant difference found between the 15 and 25 minutes HB time points in detection of any lesion (p>0.4). ADC values were statistically significantly higher with hemangiomas (p<0.05) without greater accuracy in lesion detection relative to HB phase parameters. CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MR characterizes focal hepatic lesions more accurately than ADC and conventional dynamic post-contrast time point enhancement parameters. ER values are generally superior to CR. No discernible benefit of 25 minute versus 15 minute delayed imaging is demonstrated. Public Library of Science 2013-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3689764/ /pubmed/23805174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061898 Text en © 2013 Morelli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morelli, John N.
Michaely, Henrik J.
Meyer, Mathias M.
Rustemeyer, Thassilo
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Attenberger, Ulrike I.
Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
title Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
title_full Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
title_fullStr Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
title_short Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
title_sort comparison of dynamic and liver-specific gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced mri versus apparent diffusion coefficients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061898
work_keys_str_mv AT morellijohnn comparisonofdynamicandliverspecificgadoxeticacidcontrastenhancedmriversusapparentdiffusioncoefficients
AT michaelyhenrikj comparisonofdynamicandliverspecificgadoxeticacidcontrastenhancedmriversusapparentdiffusioncoefficients
AT meyermathiasm comparisonofdynamicandliverspecificgadoxeticacidcontrastenhancedmriversusapparentdiffusioncoefficients
AT rustemeyerthassilo comparisonofdynamicandliverspecificgadoxeticacidcontrastenhancedmriversusapparentdiffusioncoefficients
AT schoenbergstefano comparisonofdynamicandliverspecificgadoxeticacidcontrastenhancedmriversusapparentdiffusioncoefficients
AT attenbergerulrikei comparisonofdynamicandliverspecificgadoxeticacidcontrastenhancedmriversusapparentdiffusioncoefficients