Cargando…

Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection

Previous research has found that masked repetition primes, presented immediately prior to the test item in a recognition memory test, increase the likelihood that participants think that the item was present in a previous study phase, even if it was not. This memory illusion is normally associated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Jason R., Buratto, Luciano G., Henson, Richard N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Masson 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23026757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.008
_version_ 1782274382719090688
author Taylor, Jason R.
Buratto, Luciano G.
Henson, Richard N.
author_facet Taylor, Jason R.
Buratto, Luciano G.
Henson, Richard N.
author_sort Taylor, Jason R.
collection PubMed
description Previous research has found that masked repetition primes, presented immediately prior to the test item in a recognition memory test, increase the likelihood that participants think that the item was present in a previous study phase, even if it was not. This memory illusion is normally associated with a feeling of familiarity, rather than recollection (e.g., as indexed by Remember/Know judgments), and has been explained in terms of an increased fluency of processing the test item, which, in the absence of awareness of the cause of that fluency (i.e., the masked prime), is attributed instead to prior exposure in the study phase. Recently however, we have found that masked conceptual primes (semantically rather than associatively related to the test item) have the opposite effect of increasing Remember but not Know judgments. This result appears difficult to explain in terms of existing theories of recollection and familiarity. Here we report data from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using the same design, in which we replicate our previous behavioral findings, and find converging evidence for increased activity following conceptual primes in brain regions associated with recollection. This neural evidence supports an account in terms of “true” recollection (for example, conceptual primes reactivating semantically related information that was generated at encoding), rather than an artifact of the mutually-exclusive nature of the Remember/Know procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3690477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Masson
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36904772013-06-24 Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection Taylor, Jason R. Buratto, Luciano G. Henson, Richard N. Cortex Special issue: Research report Previous research has found that masked repetition primes, presented immediately prior to the test item in a recognition memory test, increase the likelihood that participants think that the item was present in a previous study phase, even if it was not. This memory illusion is normally associated with a feeling of familiarity, rather than recollection (e.g., as indexed by Remember/Know judgments), and has been explained in terms of an increased fluency of processing the test item, which, in the absence of awareness of the cause of that fluency (i.e., the masked prime), is attributed instead to prior exposure in the study phase. Recently however, we have found that masked conceptual primes (semantically rather than associatively related to the test item) have the opposite effect of increasing Remember but not Know judgments. This result appears difficult to explain in terms of existing theories of recollection and familiarity. Here we report data from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using the same design, in which we replicate our previous behavioral findings, and find converging evidence for increased activity following conceptual primes in brain regions associated with recollection. This neural evidence supports an account in terms of “true” recollection (for example, conceptual primes reactivating semantically related information that was generated at encoding), rather than an artifact of the mutually-exclusive nature of the Remember/Know procedure. Masson 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3690477/ /pubmed/23026757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.008 Text en © 2013 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Special issue: Research report
Taylor, Jason R.
Buratto, Luciano G.
Henson, Richard N.
Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
title Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
title_full Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
title_fullStr Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
title_short Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
title_sort behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection
topic Special issue: Research report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23026757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.008
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorjasonr behavioralandneuralevidenceformaskedconceptualprimingofrecollection
AT burattolucianog behavioralandneuralevidenceformaskedconceptualprimingofrecollection
AT hensonrichardn behavioralandneuralevidenceformaskedconceptualprimingofrecollection