Cargando…

Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production

Genetic selection for residual feed intake (RFI) is an indirect approach for reducing enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions in beef and dairy cattle. RFI is moderately heritable (0.26 to 0.43), moderately repeatable across diets (0.33 to 0.67) and independent of body size and production, and when adjust...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basarab, J. A., Beauchemin, K. A., Baron, V. S., Ominski, K. H., Guan, L. L., Miller, S. P., Crowley, J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23739472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000888
_version_ 1782274410854481920
author Basarab, J. A.
Beauchemin, K. A.
Baron, V. S.
Ominski, K. H.
Guan, L. L.
Miller, S. P.
Crowley, J. J.
author_facet Basarab, J. A.
Beauchemin, K. A.
Baron, V. S.
Ominski, K. H.
Guan, L. L.
Miller, S. P.
Crowley, J. J.
author_sort Basarab, J. A.
collection PubMed
description Genetic selection for residual feed intake (RFI) is an indirect approach for reducing enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions in beef and dairy cattle. RFI is moderately heritable (0.26 to 0.43), moderately repeatable across diets (0.33 to 0.67) and independent of body size and production, and when adjusted for off-test ultrasound backfat thickness (RFI(fat)) is also independent of body fatness in growing animals. It is highly dependent on accurate measurement of individual animal feed intake. Within-animal repeatability of feed intake is moderate (0.29 to 0.49) with distinctive diurnal patterns associated with cattle type, diet and genotype, necessitating the recording of feed intake for at least 35 days. In addition, direct measurement of enteric CH(4) production will likely be more variable and expensive than measuring feed intake and if conducted should be expressed as CH(4) production (g/animal per day) adjusted for body size, growth, body composition and dry matter intake (DMI) or as residual CH(4) production. A further disadvantage of a direct CH(4) phenotype is that the relationships of enteric CH(4) production on other economically important traits are largely unknown. Selection for low RFI(fat) (efficient, −RFI(fat)) will result in cattle that consume less dry matter (DMI) and have an improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared with high RFI(fat) cattle (inefficient; +RFI(fat)). Few antagonistic effects have been reported for the relationships of RFI(fat) on carcass and meat quality, fertility, cow lifetime productivity and adaptability to stress or extensive grazing conditions. Low RFI(fat) cattle also produce 15% to 25% less enteric CH(4) than +RFI(fat) cattle, since DMI is positively related to enteric methane (CH(4)) production. In addition, lower DMI and feeding duration and frequency, and a different rumen bacterial profile that improves rumen fermentation in −RFI(fat) cattle may favor a 1% to 2% improvement in dry matter and CP digestibility compared with +RFI(fat) cattle. Rate of genetic change using this approach is expected to improve feed efficiency and reduce enteric CH(4) emissions from cattle by 0.75% to 1.0% per year at equal levels of body size, growth and body fatness compared with cattle not selected for RFI(fat).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36910022013-06-24 Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production Basarab, J. A. Beauchemin, K. A. Baron, V. S. Ominski, K. H. Guan, L. L. Miller, S. P. Crowley, J. J. Animal Full Paper Genetic selection for residual feed intake (RFI) is an indirect approach for reducing enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions in beef and dairy cattle. RFI is moderately heritable (0.26 to 0.43), moderately repeatable across diets (0.33 to 0.67) and independent of body size and production, and when adjusted for off-test ultrasound backfat thickness (RFI(fat)) is also independent of body fatness in growing animals. It is highly dependent on accurate measurement of individual animal feed intake. Within-animal repeatability of feed intake is moderate (0.29 to 0.49) with distinctive diurnal patterns associated with cattle type, diet and genotype, necessitating the recording of feed intake for at least 35 days. In addition, direct measurement of enteric CH(4) production will likely be more variable and expensive than measuring feed intake and if conducted should be expressed as CH(4) production (g/animal per day) adjusted for body size, growth, body composition and dry matter intake (DMI) or as residual CH(4) production. A further disadvantage of a direct CH(4) phenotype is that the relationships of enteric CH(4) production on other economically important traits are largely unknown. Selection for low RFI(fat) (efficient, −RFI(fat)) will result in cattle that consume less dry matter (DMI) and have an improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared with high RFI(fat) cattle (inefficient; +RFI(fat)). Few antagonistic effects have been reported for the relationships of RFI(fat) on carcass and meat quality, fertility, cow lifetime productivity and adaptability to stress or extensive grazing conditions. Low RFI(fat) cattle also produce 15% to 25% less enteric CH(4) than +RFI(fat) cattle, since DMI is positively related to enteric methane (CH(4)) production. In addition, lower DMI and feeding duration and frequency, and a different rumen bacterial profile that improves rumen fermentation in −RFI(fat) cattle may favor a 1% to 2% improvement in dry matter and CP digestibility compared with +RFI(fat) cattle. Rate of genetic change using this approach is expected to improve feed efficiency and reduce enteric CH(4) emissions from cattle by 0.75% to 1.0% per year at equal levels of body size, growth and body fatness compared with cattle not selected for RFI(fat). Cambridge University Press 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3691002/ /pubmed/23739472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000888 Text en © The Animal Consortium and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 2013 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/7>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Basarab, J. A.
Beauchemin, K. A.
Baron, V. S.
Ominski, K. H.
Guan, L. L.
Miller, S. P.
Crowley, J. J.
Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
title Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
title_full Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
title_fullStr Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
title_full_unstemmed Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
title_short Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
title_sort reducing ghg emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23739472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000888
work_keys_str_mv AT basarabja reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction
AT beaucheminka reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction
AT baronvs reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction
AT ominskikh reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction
AT guanll reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction
AT millersp reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction
AT crowleyjj reducingghgemissionsthroughgeneticimprovementforfeedefficiencyeffectsoneconomicallyimportanttraitsandentericmethaneproduction