Cargando…

Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference

OBJECT: The concept of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has been used to measure the threshold by which the effect of a specific treatment can be considered clinically meaningful. MCID has previously been studied in surgical patients, however few studies have assessed its role in spina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auffinger, Brenda M., Lall, Rishi R., Dahdaleh, Nader S., Wong, Albert P., Lam, Sandi K., Koski, Tyler, Fessler, Richard G., Smith, Zachary A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067408
_version_ 1782274430146183168
author Auffinger, Brenda M.
Lall, Rishi R.
Dahdaleh, Nader S.
Wong, Albert P.
Lam, Sandi K.
Koski, Tyler
Fessler, Richard G.
Smith, Zachary A.
author_facet Auffinger, Brenda M.
Lall, Rishi R.
Dahdaleh, Nader S.
Wong, Albert P.
Lam, Sandi K.
Koski, Tyler
Fessler, Richard G.
Smith, Zachary A.
author_sort Auffinger, Brenda M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECT: The concept of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has been used to measure the threshold by which the effect of a specific treatment can be considered clinically meaningful. MCID has previously been studied in surgical patients, however few studies have assessed its role in spinal surgery. The goal of this study was to assess the role of MCID in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: Data was collected on 30 patients who underwent ACDF for CSM between 2007 and 2012. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual-Analog Scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary PRO scores were collected. Five distribution- and anchor-based approaches were used to calculate MCID threshold values average change, change difference, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), minimum detectable change (MDC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). The Health Transition Item of the SF-36 (HTI) was used as an external anchor. RESULTS: Patients had a significant improvement in all mean physical PRO scores postoperatively (p<0.01) NDI (29.24 to 14.82), VAS (5.06 to 1.72), and PCS (36.98 to 44.22). The five MCID approaches yielded a range of values for each PRO: 2.00–8.78 for PCS, 2.06–5.73 for MCS, 4.83–13.39 for NDI, and 0.36–3.11 for VAS. PCS was the most representative PRO measure, presenting the greatest area under the ROC curve (0.94). MDC values were not affected by the choice of anchor and their threshold of improvement was statistically greater than the chance of error from unimproved patients. CONCLUSION: SF-36 PCS was the most representative PRO measure. MDC appears to be the most appropriate MCID method. When MDC was applied together with HTI anchor, the MCID thresholds were: 13.39 for NDI, 3.11 for VAS, 5.56 for PCS and 5.73 for MCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36911752013-07-03 Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference Auffinger, Brenda M. Lall, Rishi R. Dahdaleh, Nader S. Wong, Albert P. Lam, Sandi K. Koski, Tyler Fessler, Richard G. Smith, Zachary A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECT: The concept of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has been used to measure the threshold by which the effect of a specific treatment can be considered clinically meaningful. MCID has previously been studied in surgical patients, however few studies have assessed its role in spinal surgery. The goal of this study was to assess the role of MCID in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: Data was collected on 30 patients who underwent ACDF for CSM between 2007 and 2012. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual-Analog Scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary PRO scores were collected. Five distribution- and anchor-based approaches were used to calculate MCID threshold values average change, change difference, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), minimum detectable change (MDC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). The Health Transition Item of the SF-36 (HTI) was used as an external anchor. RESULTS: Patients had a significant improvement in all mean physical PRO scores postoperatively (p<0.01) NDI (29.24 to 14.82), VAS (5.06 to 1.72), and PCS (36.98 to 44.22). The five MCID approaches yielded a range of values for each PRO: 2.00–8.78 for PCS, 2.06–5.73 for MCS, 4.83–13.39 for NDI, and 0.36–3.11 for VAS. PCS was the most representative PRO measure, presenting the greatest area under the ROC curve (0.94). MDC values were not affected by the choice of anchor and their threshold of improvement was statistically greater than the chance of error from unimproved patients. CONCLUSION: SF-36 PCS was the most representative PRO measure. MDC appears to be the most appropriate MCID method. When MDC was applied together with HTI anchor, the MCID thresholds were: 13.39 for NDI, 3.11 for VAS, 5.56 for PCS and 5.73 for MCS. Public Library of Science 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3691175/ /pubmed/23826290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067408 Text en © 2013 Auffinger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Auffinger, Brenda M.
Lall, Rishi R.
Dahdaleh, Nader S.
Wong, Albert P.
Lam, Sandi K.
Koski, Tyler
Fessler, Richard G.
Smith, Zachary A.
Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference
title Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference
title_full Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference
title_fullStr Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference
title_short Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference
title_sort measuring surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: assessment of minimum clinically important difference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067408
work_keys_str_mv AT auffingerbrendam measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT lallrishir measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT dahdalehnaders measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT wongalbertp measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT lamsandik measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT koskityler measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT fesslerrichardg measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference
AT smithzacharya measuringsurgicaloutcomesincervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatientsundergoinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionassessmentofminimumclinicallyimportantdifference