Cargando…

Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms

Hospital isolation rooms are vital for the containment (when under negative pressure) of patients with, or the protection (when under positive pressure) of patients, from airborne infectious agents. Such facilities were essential for the management of highly contagious patients during the 2003 sever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Julian W., Nicolle, Andre, Pantelic, Jovan, Klettner, Christian A., Su, Ruikun, Kalliomaki, Petri, Saarinen, Pekka, Koskela, Hannu, Reijula, Kari, Mustakallio, Panu, Cheong, David K. W., Sekhar, Chandra, Tham, Kwok Wai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066663
_version_ 1782274433718681600
author Tang, Julian W.
Nicolle, Andre
Pantelic, Jovan
Klettner, Christian A.
Su, Ruikun
Kalliomaki, Petri
Saarinen, Pekka
Koskela, Hannu
Reijula, Kari
Mustakallio, Panu
Cheong, David K. W.
Sekhar, Chandra
Tham, Kwok Wai
author_facet Tang, Julian W.
Nicolle, Andre
Pantelic, Jovan
Klettner, Christian A.
Su, Ruikun
Kalliomaki, Petri
Saarinen, Pekka
Koskela, Hannu
Reijula, Kari
Mustakallio, Panu
Cheong, David K. W.
Sekhar, Chandra
Tham, Kwok Wai
author_sort Tang, Julian W.
collection PubMed
description Hospital isolation rooms are vital for the containment (when under negative pressure) of patients with, or the protection (when under positive pressure) of patients, from airborne infectious agents. Such facilities were essential for the management of highly contagious patients during the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks and the more recent 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic. Many different types of door designs are used in the construction of such isolation rooms, which may be related to the space available and affordability. Using colored food dye as a tracer, the qualitative effects of door-opening motions on the dissemination of potentially contaminated air into and out of a single isolation room were visualized and filmed using Reynolds-number-equivalent, small-scale, water-tank models fitted with programmable door-opening and moving human figure motions. Careful scaling considerations involved in the design and construction of these water-tank models enabled these results to be accurately extrapolated to the full-scale situation. Four simple types of door design were tested: variable speed single and double, sliding and hinged doors, in combination with the moving human figure. The resulting video footage was edited, synchronized and presented in a series of split-screen formats. From these experiments, it is clear that double-hinged doors pose the greatest risk of leakage into or out of the room, followed by (in order of decreasing risk) single-hinged, double-sliding and single-sliding doors. The relative effect of the moving human figure on spreading any potential contamination was greatest with the sliding doors, as the bulk airflows induced were large relative to those resulting from these door-opening motions. However, with the hinged doors, the airflows induced by these door-opening motions were significantly greater. Further experiments involving a simulated ventilated environment are required, but from these findings alone, it appears that sliding-doors are far more effective for hospital isolation room containment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36911902013-07-03 Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms Tang, Julian W. Nicolle, Andre Pantelic, Jovan Klettner, Christian A. Su, Ruikun Kalliomaki, Petri Saarinen, Pekka Koskela, Hannu Reijula, Kari Mustakallio, Panu Cheong, David K. W. Sekhar, Chandra Tham, Kwok Wai PLoS One Research Article Hospital isolation rooms are vital for the containment (when under negative pressure) of patients with, or the protection (when under positive pressure) of patients, from airborne infectious agents. Such facilities were essential for the management of highly contagious patients during the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks and the more recent 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic. Many different types of door designs are used in the construction of such isolation rooms, which may be related to the space available and affordability. Using colored food dye as a tracer, the qualitative effects of door-opening motions on the dissemination of potentially contaminated air into and out of a single isolation room were visualized and filmed using Reynolds-number-equivalent, small-scale, water-tank models fitted with programmable door-opening and moving human figure motions. Careful scaling considerations involved in the design and construction of these water-tank models enabled these results to be accurately extrapolated to the full-scale situation. Four simple types of door design were tested: variable speed single and double, sliding and hinged doors, in combination with the moving human figure. The resulting video footage was edited, synchronized and presented in a series of split-screen formats. From these experiments, it is clear that double-hinged doors pose the greatest risk of leakage into or out of the room, followed by (in order of decreasing risk) single-hinged, double-sliding and single-sliding doors. The relative effect of the moving human figure on spreading any potential contamination was greatest with the sliding doors, as the bulk airflows induced were large relative to those resulting from these door-opening motions. However, with the hinged doors, the airflows induced by these door-opening motions were significantly greater. Further experiments involving a simulated ventilated environment are required, but from these findings alone, it appears that sliding-doors are far more effective for hospital isolation room containment. Public Library of Science 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3691190/ /pubmed/23826109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066663 Text en © 2013 Tang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Julian W.
Nicolle, Andre
Pantelic, Jovan
Klettner, Christian A.
Su, Ruikun
Kalliomaki, Petri
Saarinen, Pekka
Koskela, Hannu
Reijula, Kari
Mustakallio, Panu
Cheong, David K. W.
Sekhar, Chandra
Tham, Kwok Wai
Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms
title Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms
title_full Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms
title_fullStr Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms
title_full_unstemmed Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms
title_short Different Types of Door-Opening Motions as Contributing Factors to Containment Failures in Hospital Isolation Rooms
title_sort different types of door-opening motions as contributing factors to containment failures in hospital isolation rooms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066663
work_keys_str_mv AT tangjulianw differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT nicolleandre differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT pantelicjovan differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT klettnerchristiana differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT suruikun differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT kalliomakipetri differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT saarinenpekka differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT koskelahannu differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT reijulakari differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT mustakalliopanu differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT cheongdavidkw differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT sekharchandra differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms
AT thamkwokwai differenttypesofdooropeningmotionsascontributingfactorstocontainmentfailuresinhospitalisolationrooms