Cargando…

What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing

The combined knowledge of word meanings and grammatical rules does not allow a listener to grasp the intended meaning of a speaker’s utterance. Pragmatic inferences on the part of the listener are also required. The present work focuses on the processing of ironic utterances (imagine a slow day bein...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spotorno, Nicola, Cheylus, Anne, Van Der Henst, Jean-Baptiste, Noveck, Ira A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066839
_version_ 1782274451768868864
author Spotorno, Nicola
Cheylus, Anne
Van Der Henst, Jean-Baptiste
Noveck, Ira A.
author_facet Spotorno, Nicola
Cheylus, Anne
Van Der Henst, Jean-Baptiste
Noveck, Ira A.
author_sort Spotorno, Nicola
collection PubMed
description The combined knowledge of word meanings and grammatical rules does not allow a listener to grasp the intended meaning of a speaker’s utterance. Pragmatic inferences on the part of the listener are also required. The present work focuses on the processing of ironic utterances (imagine a slow day being described as “really productive”) because these clearly require the listener to go beyond the linguistic code. Such utterances are advantageous experimentally because they can serve as their own controls in the form of literal sentences (now imagine an active day being described as “really productive”) as we employ techniques from electrophysiology (EEG). Importantly, the results confirm previous ERP findings showing that irony processing elicits an enhancement of the P600 component (Regel et al., 2011). More original are the findings drawn from Time Frequency Analysis (TFA) and especially the increase of power in the gamma band in the 280–400 time-window, which points to an integration among different streams of information relatively early in the comprehension of an irony. This represents a departure from traditional accounts of language processing which generally view pragmatic inferences as late-arriving. We propose that these results indicate that unification operations between the linguistic code and contextual information play a critical role throughout the course of irony processing and earlier than previously thought.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36912662013-07-03 What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing Spotorno, Nicola Cheylus, Anne Van Der Henst, Jean-Baptiste Noveck, Ira A. PLoS One Research Article The combined knowledge of word meanings and grammatical rules does not allow a listener to grasp the intended meaning of a speaker’s utterance. Pragmatic inferences on the part of the listener are also required. The present work focuses on the processing of ironic utterances (imagine a slow day being described as “really productive”) because these clearly require the listener to go beyond the linguistic code. Such utterances are advantageous experimentally because they can serve as their own controls in the form of literal sentences (now imagine an active day being described as “really productive”) as we employ techniques from electrophysiology (EEG). Importantly, the results confirm previous ERP findings showing that irony processing elicits an enhancement of the P600 component (Regel et al., 2011). More original are the findings drawn from Time Frequency Analysis (TFA) and especially the increase of power in the gamma band in the 280–400 time-window, which points to an integration among different streams of information relatively early in the comprehension of an irony. This represents a departure from traditional accounts of language processing which generally view pragmatic inferences as late-arriving. We propose that these results indicate that unification operations between the linguistic code and contextual information play a critical role throughout the course of irony processing and earlier than previously thought. Public Library of Science 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3691266/ /pubmed/23826155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066839 Text en © 2013 Spotorno et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spotorno, Nicola
Cheylus, Anne
Van Der Henst, Jean-Baptiste
Noveck, Ira A.
What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing
title What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing
title_full What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing
title_fullStr What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing
title_full_unstemmed What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing
title_short What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing
title_sort what’s behind a p600? integration operations during irony processing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066839
work_keys_str_mv AT spotornonicola whatsbehindap600integrationoperationsduringironyprocessing
AT cheylusanne whatsbehindap600integrationoperationsduringironyprocessing
AT vanderhenstjeanbaptiste whatsbehindap600integrationoperationsduringironyprocessing
AT noveckiraa whatsbehindap600integrationoperationsduringironyprocessing