Cargando…

A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the buccal alveolar bone thickness following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four individuals (15 females, 9 males; 13.9 years) that underwent RME therapy were included. Each pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akyalcin, Sercan, Schaefer, Jeffrey S., English, Jeryl D., Stephens, Claude R., Winkelmann, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807931
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.85
_version_ 1782274461191372800
author Akyalcin, Sercan
Schaefer, Jeffrey S.
English, Jeryl D.
Stephens, Claude R.
Winkelmann, Sam
author_facet Akyalcin, Sercan
Schaefer, Jeffrey S.
English, Jeryl D.
Stephens, Claude R.
Winkelmann, Sam
author_sort Akyalcin, Sercan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the buccal alveolar bone thickness following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four individuals (15 females, 9 males; 13.9 years) that underwent RME therapy were included. Each patient had CBCT images available before (T1), after (T2), and 2 to 3 years after (T3) maxillary expansion therapy. Coronal multiplanar reconstruction images were used to measure the linear transverse dimensions, inclinations of teeth, and thickness of the buccal alveolar bone. One-way ANOVA analysis was used to compare the changes between the three times of imaging. Pairwise comparisons were made with the Bonferroni method. The level of significance was established at p<0.05. RESULTS: The mean changes between the points in time yielded significant differences for both molar and premolar transverse measurements between T1 and T2 (p<0.05) and between T1 and T3 (p<0.05). When evaluating the effect of maxillary expansion on the amount of buccal alveolar bone, a decrease between T1 and T2 and an increase between T2 and T3 were found in the buccal bone thickness of both the maxillary first premolars and maxillary first molars. However, these changes were not significant. Similar changes were observed for the angular measurements. CONCLUSION: RME resulted in non-significant reduction of buccal bone between T1 and T2. These changes were reversible in the long-term with no evident deleterious effects on the alveolar buccal bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36913782013-06-27 A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion Akyalcin, Sercan Schaefer, Jeffrey S. English, Jeryl D. Stephens, Claude R. Winkelmann, Sam Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the buccal alveolar bone thickness following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four individuals (15 females, 9 males; 13.9 years) that underwent RME therapy were included. Each patient had CBCT images available before (T1), after (T2), and 2 to 3 years after (T3) maxillary expansion therapy. Coronal multiplanar reconstruction images were used to measure the linear transverse dimensions, inclinations of teeth, and thickness of the buccal alveolar bone. One-way ANOVA analysis was used to compare the changes between the three times of imaging. Pairwise comparisons were made with the Bonferroni method. The level of significance was established at p<0.05. RESULTS: The mean changes between the points in time yielded significant differences for both molar and premolar transverse measurements between T1 and T2 (p<0.05) and between T1 and T3 (p<0.05). When evaluating the effect of maxillary expansion on the amount of buccal alveolar bone, a decrease between T1 and T2 and an increase between T2 and T3 were found in the buccal bone thickness of both the maxillary first premolars and maxillary first molars. However, these changes were not significant. Similar changes were observed for the angular measurements. CONCLUSION: RME resulted in non-significant reduction of buccal bone between T1 and T2. These changes were reversible in the long-term with no evident deleterious effects on the alveolar buccal bone. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2013-06 2013-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3691378/ /pubmed/23807931 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.85 Text en Copyright © 2013 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akyalcin, Sercan
Schaefer, Jeffrey S.
English, Jeryl D.
Stephens, Claude R.
Winkelmann, Sam
A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
title A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
title_full A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
title_fullStr A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
title_full_unstemmed A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
title_short A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
title_sort cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807931
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.85
work_keys_str_mv AT akyalcinsercan aconebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT schaeferjeffreys aconebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT englishjeryld aconebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT stephensclauder aconebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT winkelmannsam aconebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT akyalcinsercan conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT schaeferjeffreys conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT englishjeryld conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT stephensclauder conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion
AT winkelmannsam conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofbuccalbonethicknessfollowingmaxillaryexpansion