Cargando…

Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force

Cell migration through 3D tissue depends on a physicochemical balance between cell deformability and physical tissue constraints. Migration rates are further governed by the capacity to degrade ECM by proteolytic enzymes, particularly matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and integrin- and actomyosin-me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolf, Katarina, te Lindert, Mariska, Krause, Marina, Alexander, Stephanie, te Riet, Joost, Willis, Amanda L., Hoffman, Robert M., Figdor, Carl G., Weiss, Stephen J., Friedl, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23798731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210152
_version_ 1782274467972513792
author Wolf, Katarina
te Lindert, Mariska
Krause, Marina
Alexander, Stephanie
te Riet, Joost
Willis, Amanda L.
Hoffman, Robert M.
Figdor, Carl G.
Weiss, Stephen J.
Friedl, Peter
author_facet Wolf, Katarina
te Lindert, Mariska
Krause, Marina
Alexander, Stephanie
te Riet, Joost
Willis, Amanda L.
Hoffman, Robert M.
Figdor, Carl G.
Weiss, Stephen J.
Friedl, Peter
author_sort Wolf, Katarina
collection PubMed
description Cell migration through 3D tissue depends on a physicochemical balance between cell deformability and physical tissue constraints. Migration rates are further governed by the capacity to degrade ECM by proteolytic enzymes, particularly matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and integrin- and actomyosin-mediated mechanocoupling. Yet, how these parameters cooperate when space is confined remains unclear. Using MMP-degradable collagen lattices or nondegradable substrates of varying porosity, we quantitatively identify the limits of cell migration by physical arrest. MMP-independent migration declined as linear function of pore size and with deformation of the nucleus, with arrest reached at 10% of the nuclear cross section (tumor cells, 7 µm(2); T cells, 4 µm(2); neutrophils, 2 µm(2)). Residual migration under space restriction strongly depended upon MMP-dependent ECM cleavage by enlarging matrix pore diameters, and integrin- and actomyosin-dependent force generation, which jointly propelled the nucleus. The limits of interstitial cell migration thus depend upon scaffold porosity and deformation of the nucleus, with pericellular collagenolysis and mechanocoupling as modulators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36914582013-12-24 Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force Wolf, Katarina te Lindert, Mariska Krause, Marina Alexander, Stephanie te Riet, Joost Willis, Amanda L. Hoffman, Robert M. Figdor, Carl G. Weiss, Stephen J. Friedl, Peter J Cell Biol Research Articles Cell migration through 3D tissue depends on a physicochemical balance between cell deformability and physical tissue constraints. Migration rates are further governed by the capacity to degrade ECM by proteolytic enzymes, particularly matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and integrin- and actomyosin-mediated mechanocoupling. Yet, how these parameters cooperate when space is confined remains unclear. Using MMP-degradable collagen lattices or nondegradable substrates of varying porosity, we quantitatively identify the limits of cell migration by physical arrest. MMP-independent migration declined as linear function of pore size and with deformation of the nucleus, with arrest reached at 10% of the nuclear cross section (tumor cells, 7 µm(2); T cells, 4 µm(2); neutrophils, 2 µm(2)). Residual migration under space restriction strongly depended upon MMP-dependent ECM cleavage by enlarging matrix pore diameters, and integrin- and actomyosin-dependent force generation, which jointly propelled the nucleus. The limits of interstitial cell migration thus depend upon scaffold porosity and deformation of the nucleus, with pericellular collagenolysis and mechanocoupling as modulators. The Rockefeller University Press 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3691458/ /pubmed/23798731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210152 Text en © 2013 Wolf et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wolf, Katarina
te Lindert, Mariska
Krause, Marina
Alexander, Stephanie
te Riet, Joost
Willis, Amanda L.
Hoffman, Robert M.
Figdor, Carl G.
Weiss, Stephen J.
Friedl, Peter
Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
title Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
title_full Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
title_fullStr Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
title_full_unstemmed Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
title_short Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
title_sort physical limits of cell migration: control by ecm space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23798731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210152
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfkatarina physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT telindertmariska physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT krausemarina physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT alexanderstephanie physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT terietjoost physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT willisamandal physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT hoffmanrobertm physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT figdorcarlg physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT weissstephenj physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce
AT friedlpeter physicallimitsofcellmigrationcontrolbyecmspaceandnucleardeformationandtuningbyproteolysisandtractionforce