Cargando…
Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli
Dot arrays are often used to study basic numerical skills across cultures, species and development. Researchers investigate the ability of subjects to discriminate between dot arrays, as a function of the ratio or distance between their numerosities. Such studies have contributed significantly to th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00375 |
_version_ | 1782274478845198336 |
---|---|
author | Leibovich, Tali Henik, Avishai |
author_facet | Leibovich, Tali Henik, Avishai |
author_sort | Leibovich, Tali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dot arrays are often used to study basic numerical skills across cultures, species and development. Researchers investigate the ability of subjects to discriminate between dot arrays, as a function of the ratio or distance between their numerosities. Such studies have contributed significantly to the number sense theory (i.e., that humans are born with the ability to process numerosities, and share this ability with various species)—possibly the most influential theory in numerical cognition literature today. However, a dot array contains, in addition to numerosity, continuous properties such as the total surface area of the dots, their density, etc. These properties are highly correlated with numerosity and therefore might influence participants' performance. Different ways in which different studies choose to deal with this confound sometimes lead to contradicting results, and in our opinion, do not completely eliminate the confound. In this work, we review these studies and suggest several possible reasons for the contradictions in the literature. We also suggest that studying continuous properties, instead of just trying to control them, may contribute to unraveling the building blocks of numerical abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3691512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36915122013-06-26 Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli Leibovich, Tali Henik, Avishai Front Psychol Psychology Dot arrays are often used to study basic numerical skills across cultures, species and development. Researchers investigate the ability of subjects to discriminate between dot arrays, as a function of the ratio or distance between their numerosities. Such studies have contributed significantly to the number sense theory (i.e., that humans are born with the ability to process numerosities, and share this ability with various species)—possibly the most influential theory in numerical cognition literature today. However, a dot array contains, in addition to numerosity, continuous properties such as the total surface area of the dots, their density, etc. These properties are highly correlated with numerosity and therefore might influence participants' performance. Different ways in which different studies choose to deal with this confound sometimes lead to contradicting results, and in our opinion, do not completely eliminate the confound. In this work, we review these studies and suggest several possible reasons for the contradictions in the literature. We also suggest that studying continuous properties, instead of just trying to control them, may contribute to unraveling the building blocks of numerical abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3691512/ /pubmed/23805121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00375 Text en Copyright © 2013 Leibovich and Henik. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Leibovich, Tali Henik, Avishai Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
title | Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
title_full | Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
title_fullStr | Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
title_short | Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
title_sort | magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leibovichtali magnitudeprocessinginnonsymbolicstimuli AT henikavishai magnitudeprocessinginnonsymbolicstimuli |