Cargando…
Spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review of the literature and commentary
As exhibited throughout the medical literature over many decades, there is a lack of uniformity in the manner in which spine pain patients have historically qualified for and received manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Also, for different professions that treat the same types of spinal conditions...
Autor principal: | DiGiorgi, Dennis |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23672974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-21-14 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outcomes indicators and a risk classification system for spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review and proposal
por: DiGiorgi, Dennis, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Commentary: Congenital corneal anesthesia
por: Kaur, Manpreet, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary on “Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia”
por: Choi, Soo In, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Review conclusions by Ernst and Canter regarding spinal manipulation refuted
por: Bronfort, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
por: Byrne, Jennifer A.
Publicado: (2016)