Cargando…

CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended and commonly used for extended treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), but its superiority over warfarin has been demonstrated in only one randomised study. We report here the rationale, design and a priori analysis plans of Com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Agnes YY, Bauersachs, Rupert, Janas, Mette S, Jarner, Mikala F, Kamphuisen, Pieter W, Meyer, Guy, Khorana, Alok A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23764005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-284
_version_ 1782274491610562560
author Lee, Agnes YY
Bauersachs, Rupert
Janas, Mette S
Jarner, Mikala F
Kamphuisen, Pieter W
Meyer, Guy
Khorana, Alok A
author_facet Lee, Agnes YY
Bauersachs, Rupert
Janas, Mette S
Jarner, Mikala F
Kamphuisen, Pieter W
Meyer, Guy
Khorana, Alok A
author_sort Lee, Agnes YY
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended and commonly used for extended treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), but its superiority over warfarin has been demonstrated in only one randomised study. We report here the rationale, design and a priori analysis plans of Comparison of Acute Treatments in Cancer Haemostasis (CATCH; NCT01130025), a multinational, Phase III, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing tinzaparin with warfarin for extended treatment of CAT. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of tinzaparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The secondary objectives are to determine: safety of tinzaparin given over 6 months; clinical and laboratory markers for recurrent VTE and/or major bleeding; 6-month overall mortality; incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome; patient-reported quality of life; and healthcare resource utilisation. Nine hundred patients are randomised to receive tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 6 months or initial tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 5–10 days and dose-adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0–3.0) for 6 months. The primary composite outcome is time to recurrent VTE, including incidental VTE and fatal pulmonary embolism. All patients are followed up to 6 months or death, whichever comes sooner. Blinded adjudication will be performed for all reported VTE, bleeding events and causes of death. Efficacy will be analysed using centrally adjudicated results of all patients according to intention-to-treat analysis. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board is reviewing data at regular intervals and an interim analysis is planned after 450 patients have completed the study. DISCUSSION: The results will add significantly to the knowledge of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of tinzaparin in the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer and thrombosis. Prospective data will emerge on the clinical significance of incidental VTE and risk stratification in patients with CAT. Results on post-thrombotic syndrome, quality of life and healthcare resource utilisation will inform decision makers on how to secure better patient care. If tinzaparin is shown to be more effective than warfarin, CATCH will provide valuable confirmatory data to support the use of the LMWH tinzaparin for extended treatment of CAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36915862013-06-26 CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients Lee, Agnes YY Bauersachs, Rupert Janas, Mette S Jarner, Mikala F Kamphuisen, Pieter W Meyer, Guy Khorana, Alok A BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended and commonly used for extended treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), but its superiority over warfarin has been demonstrated in only one randomised study. We report here the rationale, design and a priori analysis plans of Comparison of Acute Treatments in Cancer Haemostasis (CATCH; NCT01130025), a multinational, Phase III, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing tinzaparin with warfarin for extended treatment of CAT. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of tinzaparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The secondary objectives are to determine: safety of tinzaparin given over 6 months; clinical and laboratory markers for recurrent VTE and/or major bleeding; 6-month overall mortality; incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome; patient-reported quality of life; and healthcare resource utilisation. Nine hundred patients are randomised to receive tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 6 months or initial tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 5–10 days and dose-adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0–3.0) for 6 months. The primary composite outcome is time to recurrent VTE, including incidental VTE and fatal pulmonary embolism. All patients are followed up to 6 months or death, whichever comes sooner. Blinded adjudication will be performed for all reported VTE, bleeding events and causes of death. Efficacy will be analysed using centrally adjudicated results of all patients according to intention-to-treat analysis. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board is reviewing data at regular intervals and an interim analysis is planned after 450 patients have completed the study. DISCUSSION: The results will add significantly to the knowledge of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of tinzaparin in the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer and thrombosis. Prospective data will emerge on the clinical significance of incidental VTE and risk stratification in patients with CAT. Results on post-thrombotic syndrome, quality of life and healthcare resource utilisation will inform decision makers on how to secure better patient care. If tinzaparin is shown to be more effective than warfarin, CATCH will provide valuable confirmatory data to support the use of the LMWH tinzaparin for extended treatment of CAT. BioMed Central 2013-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3691586/ /pubmed/23764005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-284 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lee, Agnes YY
Bauersachs, Rupert
Janas, Mette S
Jarner, Mikala F
Kamphuisen, Pieter W
Meyer, Guy
Khorana, Alok A
CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
title CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
title_full CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
title_fullStr CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
title_short CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
title_sort catch: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23764005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-284
work_keys_str_mv AT leeagnesyy catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients
AT bauersachsrupert catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients
AT janasmettes catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients
AT jarnermikalaf catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients
AT kamphuisenpieterw catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients
AT meyerguy catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients
AT khoranaaloka catcharandomisedclinicaltrialcomparinglongtermtinzaparinversuswarfarinfortreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolismincancerpatients