Cargando…
Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study
BACKGROUND: Retraction in Medline medical literature experienced a tenfold increase between 1999 and 2009, however retraction remains a rare event since it represents 0.02% of publications. Retractions used to be handled following informal practices until they were formalized in 2009 by the Committe...
Autores principales: | Decullier, Evelyne, Huot, Laure, Samson, Géraldine, Maisonneuve, Hervé |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-238 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What time-lag for a retraction search on PubMed?
por: Decullier, Evelyne, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Fate of Protocols Submitted to a French National Funding Scheme: A Cohort Study
por: Decullier, Evelyne, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Medical device assessment: scientific evidence examined by the French national agency for health – a descriptive study
por: Huot, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices
por: Deculllier, Evelyne, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Bevacizumab and ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an updated meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
por: Kodjikian, Laurent, et al.
Publicado: (2014)