Cargando…

Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the impact of treatment flexibility on clinical outcomes in either a corifollitropin alfa or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) protocol. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy non-inferiority c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leader, Arthur, Devroey, Paul, Witjes, Han, Gordon, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-52
_version_ 1782274505729638400
author Leader, Arthur
Devroey, Paul
Witjes, Han
Gordon, Keith
author_facet Leader, Arthur
Devroey, Paul
Witjes, Han
Gordon, Keith
author_sort Leader, Arthur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the impact of treatment flexibility on clinical outcomes in either a corifollitropin alfa or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) protocol. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy non-inferiority clinical trial (Engage). Efficacy outcomes were assessed on patients from the Engage trial who started treatment on menstrual cycle day 2 versus menstrual cycle day 3, patients who received rFSH step-down or fixed-dose rFSH, patients who received rFSH on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) compared with those who did not, and patients who received hCG when the criterion was reached versus those with a 1-day delay. RESULTS: The effect of each of the treatment flexibility options on ongoing pregnancy rate was not significant. The estimated difference (95% confidence interval) in ongoing pregnancy rate was -4.3% (-9.4%, 0.8%) for patients who started ovarian stimulation on cycle day 2 versus day 3, 1.8% (-4.1%, 7.6%) for patients who received hCG on the day the hCG criterion was met versus 1 day after, 3.2% (-2.1%, 8.6%) for patients who received rFSH on the day of hCG administration versus those who did not, and -5.8% (-13.0%, 1.4%) for patients who received a reduced versus fixed-dose of rFSH from day 8. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment flexibility of ovarian stimulation does not substantially affect the clinical outcome in patients’ treatment following initiation of ovarian stimulation with either corifollitropin alfa or with daily rFSH in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00696800.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36916502013-06-26 Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial Leader, Arthur Devroey, Paul Witjes, Han Gordon, Keith Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the impact of treatment flexibility on clinical outcomes in either a corifollitropin alfa or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) protocol. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy non-inferiority clinical trial (Engage). Efficacy outcomes were assessed on patients from the Engage trial who started treatment on menstrual cycle day 2 versus menstrual cycle day 3, patients who received rFSH step-down or fixed-dose rFSH, patients who received rFSH on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) compared with those who did not, and patients who received hCG when the criterion was reached versus those with a 1-day delay. RESULTS: The effect of each of the treatment flexibility options on ongoing pregnancy rate was not significant. The estimated difference (95% confidence interval) in ongoing pregnancy rate was -4.3% (-9.4%, 0.8%) for patients who started ovarian stimulation on cycle day 2 versus day 3, 1.8% (-4.1%, 7.6%) for patients who received hCG on the day the hCG criterion was met versus 1 day after, 3.2% (-2.1%, 8.6%) for patients who received rFSH on the day of hCG administration versus those who did not, and -5.8% (-13.0%, 1.4%) for patients who received a reduced versus fixed-dose of rFSH from day 8. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment flexibility of ovarian stimulation does not substantially affect the clinical outcome in patients’ treatment following initiation of ovarian stimulation with either corifollitropin alfa or with daily rFSH in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00696800. BioMed Central 2013-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3691650/ /pubmed/23758821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-52 Text en Copyright © 2013 Leader et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Leader, Arthur
Devroey, Paul
Witjes, Han
Gordon, Keith
Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial
title Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial
title_full Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial
title_fullStr Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial
title_full_unstemmed Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial
title_short Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial
title_sort corifollitropin alfa or rfsh treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the engage trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-52
work_keys_str_mv AT leaderarthur corifollitropinalfaorrfshtreatmentflexibilityoptionsforcontrolledovarianstimulationaposthocanalysisoftheengagetrial
AT devroeypaul corifollitropinalfaorrfshtreatmentflexibilityoptionsforcontrolledovarianstimulationaposthocanalysisoftheengagetrial
AT witjeshan corifollitropinalfaorrfshtreatmentflexibilityoptionsforcontrolledovarianstimulationaposthocanalysisoftheengagetrial
AT gordonkeith corifollitropinalfaorrfshtreatmentflexibilityoptionsforcontrolledovarianstimulationaposthocanalysisoftheengagetrial