Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study
BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of AZD3199, a novel inhaled ultra-LABA, with the main aim of establishing a dose that would maintain 24-hour bronchodilation in patients with COPD. METHODS: Patients (n = 329) were randomized to AZD3199 (200, 400 or 800 μg o.d.), formoterol (9 μg b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23731768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-64 |
_version_ | 1782274520960204800 |
---|---|
author | Kuna, Piotr Ivanov, Yavor Trofimov, Vasily Ivanovich Saito, Takefumi Beckman, Ola Bengtsson, Thomas Jorup, Carin Maltais, François |
author_facet | Kuna, Piotr Ivanov, Yavor Trofimov, Vasily Ivanovich Saito, Takefumi Beckman, Ola Bengtsson, Thomas Jorup, Carin Maltais, François |
author_sort | Kuna, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of AZD3199, a novel inhaled ultra-LABA, with the main aim of establishing a dose that would maintain 24-hour bronchodilation in patients with COPD. METHODS: Patients (n = 329) were randomized to AZD3199 (200, 400 or 800 μg o.d.), formoterol (9 μg b.i.d.) or placebo via Turbuhaler® in a parallel group study. The primary objective of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of three doses of AZD3199 inhaled once daily with 9 μg formoterol twice daily and placebo, over a 4-week treatment period in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. After 4 weeks, peak (0–4 h) and trough (24–26 h) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) were assessed as the primary efficacy outcome variables. RESULTS: All AZD3199 doses significantly increased mean peak and trough FEV(1) versus placebo (106–171 ml and 97–110 ml increases, respectively), but with no clear dose–response; the level of bronchodilation was comparable to or greater than that achieved with formoterol. Forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak bronchodilation also significantly increased with AZD3199 versus placebo (153–204 ml). COPD symptom scores and reliever use were reduced with AZD3199, while FEV(1) reversibility was unaltered. Adverse events were mild-to-moderate, with no safety concerns identified. Drug exposure was dose-proportional, but lower than predicted from healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: All three doses of AZD3199 produced 24-hour bronchodilation, but with no clear dose–response, suggesting that doses of 200 μg or less may be sufficient to maintain bronchodilation over 24 hours in patients with COPD. No safety concerns were identified. Further studies are required to determine the once-daily AZD3199 dose for COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00929708 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3691744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36917442013-06-26 Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study Kuna, Piotr Ivanov, Yavor Trofimov, Vasily Ivanovich Saito, Takefumi Beckman, Ola Bengtsson, Thomas Jorup, Carin Maltais, François Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of AZD3199, a novel inhaled ultra-LABA, with the main aim of establishing a dose that would maintain 24-hour bronchodilation in patients with COPD. METHODS: Patients (n = 329) were randomized to AZD3199 (200, 400 or 800 μg o.d.), formoterol (9 μg b.i.d.) or placebo via Turbuhaler® in a parallel group study. The primary objective of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of three doses of AZD3199 inhaled once daily with 9 μg formoterol twice daily and placebo, over a 4-week treatment period in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. After 4 weeks, peak (0–4 h) and trough (24–26 h) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) were assessed as the primary efficacy outcome variables. RESULTS: All AZD3199 doses significantly increased mean peak and trough FEV(1) versus placebo (106–171 ml and 97–110 ml increases, respectively), but with no clear dose–response; the level of bronchodilation was comparable to or greater than that achieved with formoterol. Forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak bronchodilation also significantly increased with AZD3199 versus placebo (153–204 ml). COPD symptom scores and reliever use were reduced with AZD3199, while FEV(1) reversibility was unaltered. Adverse events were mild-to-moderate, with no safety concerns identified. Drug exposure was dose-proportional, but lower than predicted from healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: All three doses of AZD3199 produced 24-hour bronchodilation, but with no clear dose–response, suggesting that doses of 200 μg or less may be sufficient to maintain bronchodilation over 24 hours in patients with COPD. No safety concerns were identified. Further studies are required to determine the once-daily AZD3199 dose for COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00929708 BioMed Central 2013 2013-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3691744/ /pubmed/23731768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-64 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kuna et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kuna, Piotr Ivanov, Yavor Trofimov, Vasily Ivanovich Saito, Takefumi Beckman, Ola Bengtsson, Thomas Jorup, Carin Maltais, François Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study |
title | Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of azd3199 vs formoterol in copd: a randomized, double-blind study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23731768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kunapiotr efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT ivanovyavor efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT trofimovvasilyivanovich efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT saitotakefumi efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT beckmanola efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT bengtssonthomas efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT jorupcarin efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT maltaisfrancois efficacyandsafetyofazd3199vsformoterolincopdarandomizeddoubleblindstudy |