Cargando…

Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure

PURPOSE: To compare ocular biometric parameters in primary angle closure suspects (PACS), primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and acute primary angle closure (APAC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 113 patients including 33 cases of PACS, 45 patients with PACG and 35 subjects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razeghinejad, Mohammad Reza, Banifatemi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825708
_version_ 1782274551174922240
author Razeghinejad, Mohammad Reza
Banifatemi, Mohammad
author_facet Razeghinejad, Mohammad Reza
Banifatemi, Mohammad
author_sort Razeghinejad, Mohammad Reza
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare ocular biometric parameters in primary angle closure suspects (PACS), primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and acute primary angle closure (APAC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 113 patients including 33 cases of PACS, 45 patients with PACG and 35 subjects with APAC. Central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT) were measured with an ultrasonic biometer. Lens-axial length factor (LAF), relative lens position, corrected ACD (CACD) and corrected lens position were calculated. The parameters were measured bilaterally but only data from the right eyes were compared. In the APAC group, biometric parameters were also compared between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in biometric parameters between PACS and PACG eyes, or between affected and fellow eyes in the APAC group (P>0.05 for all comparisons). However, eyes with APAC had thicker cornea (P=0.001), thicker lens (P<0.0001), shallower ACD (P=0.009), shallower CACD (P=0.003) and larger LAF (P<0.0001). Based on ROC curve analysis, lower ACD, and larger LT, LAF and CCT values were associated with APAC. In the APAC group, LAF (P<0.0001) and CCT (P=0.001) were significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no significant difference in biometric characteristics in eyes with PACS and PACG. However, larger LAF and CCT were predictive of APAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3691973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36919732013-07-02 Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure Razeghinejad, Mohammad Reza Banifatemi, Mohammad J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare ocular biometric parameters in primary angle closure suspects (PACS), primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and acute primary angle closure (APAC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 113 patients including 33 cases of PACS, 45 patients with PACG and 35 subjects with APAC. Central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT) were measured with an ultrasonic biometer. Lens-axial length factor (LAF), relative lens position, corrected ACD (CACD) and corrected lens position were calculated. The parameters were measured bilaterally but only data from the right eyes were compared. In the APAC group, biometric parameters were also compared between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in biometric parameters between PACS and PACG eyes, or between affected and fellow eyes in the APAC group (P>0.05 for all comparisons). However, eyes with APAC had thicker cornea (P=0.001), thicker lens (P<0.0001), shallower ACD (P=0.009), shallower CACD (P=0.003) and larger LAF (P<0.0001). Based on ROC curve analysis, lower ACD, and larger LT, LAF and CCT values were associated with APAC. In the APAC group, LAF (P<0.0001) and CCT (P=0.001) were significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no significant difference in biometric characteristics in eyes with PACS and PACG. However, larger LAF and CCT were predictive of APAC. Ophthalmic Research Center 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3691973/ /pubmed/23825708 Text en © 2013 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Razeghinejad, Mohammad Reza
Banifatemi, Mohammad
Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure
title Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure
title_full Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure
title_fullStr Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure
title_full_unstemmed Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure
title_short Ocular Biometry in Angle Closure
title_sort ocular biometry in angle closure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3691973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825708
work_keys_str_mv AT razeghinejadmohammadreza ocularbiometryinangleclosure
AT banifatemimohammad ocularbiometryinangleclosure