Cargando…
Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
CD4+ T cell enumeration is used to determine eligibility for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to monitor the immune status of HIV-positive patients; however, many patients do not have access to this essential diagnostic test. Introducing point of care (POC) testing may improve access. We have evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067612 |
_version_ | 1782274623410274304 |
---|---|
author | Mwau, Matilu Adungo, Ferdinard Kadima, Silvia Njagi, Ephantus Kirwaye, Carolyne Abubakr, Najma Salim Okubi, Lucy Atsieno Waihenya, Mary Lusike, Judi Hungu, Jackson |
author_facet | Mwau, Matilu Adungo, Ferdinard Kadima, Silvia Njagi, Ephantus Kirwaye, Carolyne Abubakr, Najma Salim Okubi, Lucy Atsieno Waihenya, Mary Lusike, Judi Hungu, Jackson |
author_sort | Mwau, Matilu |
collection | PubMed |
description | CD4+ T cell enumeration is used to determine eligibility for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to monitor the immune status of HIV-positive patients; however, many patients do not have access to this essential diagnostic test. Introducing point of care (POC) testing may improve access. We have evaluated Alere’s PIMA™, one such POC device, against conventional CD4+ testing platforms to determine its performance and validity for use in Kenya. In our hands, Alere PIMA™ had a coefficient of variability of 10.3% and of repeatability of 175.6 cells/µl. It differed from both the BD FACSCalibur™ (r(2) = 0.762, mean bias −64.8 cells/µl), and the BD FACSCount™ (r(2) = 0.874, mean bias 7.8 cells/µl). When compared to the FACSCalibur™ at a cutoff of 350 cells/µl, it had a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.7% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7566). With the BD FACSCount™, it had a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 83.4% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7790). The device also differed from PARTEC Cyflow™ (r(2) = 0.781, mean bias −24.2 cells/µl) and GUAVA™ (r(2) = 0.658, mean bias −0.3 cells/µl) platforms, which are used in some facilities in Kenya. We conclude that with refinement, Alere PIMA™ technology has potential benefits for HIV-positive patients. This study highlights the difficulty in selecting the most appropriate reference technology for technical evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3692483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36924832013-07-02 Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya Mwau, Matilu Adungo, Ferdinard Kadima, Silvia Njagi, Ephantus Kirwaye, Carolyne Abubakr, Najma Salim Okubi, Lucy Atsieno Waihenya, Mary Lusike, Judi Hungu, Jackson PLoS One Research Article CD4+ T cell enumeration is used to determine eligibility for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to monitor the immune status of HIV-positive patients; however, many patients do not have access to this essential diagnostic test. Introducing point of care (POC) testing may improve access. We have evaluated Alere’s PIMA™, one such POC device, against conventional CD4+ testing platforms to determine its performance and validity for use in Kenya. In our hands, Alere PIMA™ had a coefficient of variability of 10.3% and of repeatability of 175.6 cells/µl. It differed from both the BD FACSCalibur™ (r(2) = 0.762, mean bias −64.8 cells/µl), and the BD FACSCount™ (r(2) = 0.874, mean bias 7.8 cells/µl). When compared to the FACSCalibur™ at a cutoff of 350 cells/µl, it had a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.7% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7566). With the BD FACSCount™, it had a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 83.4% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7790). The device also differed from PARTEC Cyflow™ (r(2) = 0.781, mean bias −24.2 cells/µl) and GUAVA™ (r(2) = 0.658, mean bias −0.3 cells/µl) platforms, which are used in some facilities in Kenya. We conclude that with refinement, Alere PIMA™ technology has potential benefits for HIV-positive patients. This study highlights the difficulty in selecting the most appropriate reference technology for technical evaluations. Public Library of Science 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3692483/ /pubmed/23825674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067612 Text en © 2013 Mwau et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mwau, Matilu Adungo, Ferdinard Kadima, Silvia Njagi, Ephantus Kirwaye, Carolyne Abubakr, Najma Salim Okubi, Lucy Atsieno Waihenya, Mary Lusike, Judi Hungu, Jackson Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya |
title | Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya |
title_full | Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya |
title_short | Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya |
title_sort | evaluation of pima™® point of care technology for cd4 t cell enumeration in kenya |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mwaumatilu evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT adungoferdinard evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT kadimasilvia evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT njagiephantus evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT kirwayecarolyne evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT abubakrnajmasalim evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT okubilucyatsieno evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT waihenyamary evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT lusikejudi evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya AT hungujackson evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya |