Cargando…

Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya

CD4+ T cell enumeration is used to determine eligibility for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to monitor the immune status of HIV-positive patients; however, many patients do not have access to this essential diagnostic test. Introducing point of care (POC) testing may improve access. We have evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mwau, Matilu, Adungo, Ferdinard, Kadima, Silvia, Njagi, Ephantus, Kirwaye, Carolyne, Abubakr, Najma Salim, Okubi, Lucy Atsieno, Waihenya, Mary, Lusike, Judi, Hungu, Jackson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067612
_version_ 1782274623410274304
author Mwau, Matilu
Adungo, Ferdinard
Kadima, Silvia
Njagi, Ephantus
Kirwaye, Carolyne
Abubakr, Najma Salim
Okubi, Lucy Atsieno
Waihenya, Mary
Lusike, Judi
Hungu, Jackson
author_facet Mwau, Matilu
Adungo, Ferdinard
Kadima, Silvia
Njagi, Ephantus
Kirwaye, Carolyne
Abubakr, Najma Salim
Okubi, Lucy Atsieno
Waihenya, Mary
Lusike, Judi
Hungu, Jackson
author_sort Mwau, Matilu
collection PubMed
description CD4+ T cell enumeration is used to determine eligibility for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to monitor the immune status of HIV-positive patients; however, many patients do not have access to this essential diagnostic test. Introducing point of care (POC) testing may improve access. We have evaluated Alere’s PIMA™, one such POC device, against conventional CD4+ testing platforms to determine its performance and validity for use in Kenya. In our hands, Alere PIMA™ had a coefficient of variability of 10.3% and of repeatability of 175.6 cells/µl. It differed from both the BD FACSCalibur™ (r(2) = 0.762, mean bias −64.8 cells/µl), and the BD FACSCount™ (r(2) = 0.874, mean bias 7.8 cells/µl). When compared to the FACSCalibur™ at a cutoff of 350 cells/µl, it had a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.7% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7566). With the BD FACSCount™, it had a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 83.4% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7790). The device also differed from PARTEC Cyflow™ (r(2) = 0.781, mean bias −24.2 cells/µl) and GUAVA™ (r(2) = 0.658, mean bias −0.3 cells/µl) platforms, which are used in some facilities in Kenya. We conclude that with refinement, Alere PIMA™ technology has potential benefits for HIV-positive patients. This study highlights the difficulty in selecting the most appropriate reference technology for technical evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3692483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36924832013-07-02 Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya Mwau, Matilu Adungo, Ferdinard Kadima, Silvia Njagi, Ephantus Kirwaye, Carolyne Abubakr, Najma Salim Okubi, Lucy Atsieno Waihenya, Mary Lusike, Judi Hungu, Jackson PLoS One Research Article CD4+ T cell enumeration is used to determine eligibility for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to monitor the immune status of HIV-positive patients; however, many patients do not have access to this essential diagnostic test. Introducing point of care (POC) testing may improve access. We have evaluated Alere’s PIMA™, one such POC device, against conventional CD4+ testing platforms to determine its performance and validity for use in Kenya. In our hands, Alere PIMA™ had a coefficient of variability of 10.3% and of repeatability of 175.6 cells/µl. It differed from both the BD FACSCalibur™ (r(2) = 0.762, mean bias −64.8 cells/µl), and the BD FACSCount™ (r(2) = 0.874, mean bias 7.8 cells/µl). When compared to the FACSCalibur™ at a cutoff of 350 cells/µl, it had a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.7% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7566). With the BD FACSCount™, it had a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 83.4% in those aged 5 years and over (Kw = 0.7790). The device also differed from PARTEC Cyflow™ (r(2) = 0.781, mean bias −24.2 cells/µl) and GUAVA™ (r(2) = 0.658, mean bias −0.3 cells/µl) platforms, which are used in some facilities in Kenya. We conclude that with refinement, Alere PIMA™ technology has potential benefits for HIV-positive patients. This study highlights the difficulty in selecting the most appropriate reference technology for technical evaluations. Public Library of Science 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3692483/ /pubmed/23825674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067612 Text en © 2013 Mwau et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mwau, Matilu
Adungo, Ferdinard
Kadima, Silvia
Njagi, Ephantus
Kirwaye, Carolyne
Abubakr, Najma Salim
Okubi, Lucy Atsieno
Waihenya, Mary
Lusike, Judi
Hungu, Jackson
Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
title Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
title_full Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
title_fullStr Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
title_short Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
title_sort evaluation of pima™® point of care technology for cd4 t cell enumeration in kenya
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067612
work_keys_str_mv AT mwaumatilu evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT adungoferdinard evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT kadimasilvia evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT njagiephantus evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT kirwayecarolyne evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT abubakrnajmasalim evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT okubilucyatsieno evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT waihenyamary evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT lusikejudi evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya
AT hungujackson evaluationofpimapointofcaretechnologyforcd4tcellenumerationinkenya