Cargando…

State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To document and assess the variation in state legislation relating to foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak response for all 50 states and the District of Columbia by creating a database and appendix of laws and regulations that will be made available to researchers and policymakers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David, Stephanie, Burton, Jenna, Chadwick, Chris, Katz, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Illinois at Chicago Library 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692918/
_version_ 1782274686649892864
author David, Stephanie
Burton, Jenna
Chadwick, Chris
Katz, Rebecca
author_facet David, Stephanie
Burton, Jenna
Chadwick, Chris
Katz, Rebecca
author_sort David, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To document and assess the variation in state legislation relating to foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak response for all 50 states and the District of Columbia by creating a database and appendix of laws and regulations that will be made available to researchers and policymakers. INTRODUCTION: Foodborne illnesses sicken 48 million and kill 3,000 Americans every year, presenting an enduring threat to the public’s health. In just the past three years alone, the United States has experienced at least four major multistate outbreaks in food. Despite this growing problem, efforts to prevent foodborne illness pose a particular public health challenge due in part to the widely variable laws governing foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response. The recent passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) presents an opportunity for researchers, program managers, and policy makers to assess and correct the legal barriers that may hinder states in effectively implementing the FSMA’s vision with regard to increased state and local capacity for surveillance and outbreak response. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and analysis of laws and regulations relating to foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, using the following methods: (1) we created a database to record state laws and regulations relating to foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response in all 50 states and the District of Columbia; (2) we conducted a basic gap analysis of state foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response laws and policies collected in the database; and (3) we conducted case study analyses of previous multistate outbreaks from 2008–2011. RESULTS: Through compilation of the state foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response laws and regulations and analysis of previous multistate outbreaks, we are able to present trends, variations, and gaps in the legislation that directly impacts the ability of public health officials to conduct foodborne outbreak investigations. We also present policy recommendations for strengthening state laws and regulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3692918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher University of Illinois at Chicago Library
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36929182013-06-26 State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis David, Stephanie Burton, Jenna Chadwick, Chris Katz, Rebecca Online J Public Health Inform ISDS 2012 Conference Abstracts OBJECTIVE: To document and assess the variation in state legislation relating to foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak response for all 50 states and the District of Columbia by creating a database and appendix of laws and regulations that will be made available to researchers and policymakers. INTRODUCTION: Foodborne illnesses sicken 48 million and kill 3,000 Americans every year, presenting an enduring threat to the public’s health. In just the past three years alone, the United States has experienced at least four major multistate outbreaks in food. Despite this growing problem, efforts to prevent foodborne illness pose a particular public health challenge due in part to the widely variable laws governing foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response. The recent passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) presents an opportunity for researchers, program managers, and policy makers to assess and correct the legal barriers that may hinder states in effectively implementing the FSMA’s vision with regard to increased state and local capacity for surveillance and outbreak response. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and analysis of laws and regulations relating to foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, using the following methods: (1) we created a database to record state laws and regulations relating to foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response in all 50 states and the District of Columbia; (2) we conducted a basic gap analysis of state foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response laws and policies collected in the database; and (3) we conducted case study analyses of previous multistate outbreaks from 2008–2011. RESULTS: Through compilation of the state foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak response laws and regulations and analysis of previous multistate outbreaks, we are able to present trends, variations, and gaps in the legislation that directly impacts the ability of public health officials to conduct foodborne outbreak investigations. We also present policy recommendations for strengthening state laws and regulations. University of Illinois at Chicago Library 2013-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3692918/ Text en ©2013 the author(s) http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/ojphi/about/submissions#copyrightNotice This is an Open Access article. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.
spellingShingle ISDS 2012 Conference Abstracts
David, Stephanie
Burton, Jenna
Chadwick, Chris
Katz, Rebecca
State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis
title State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis
title_full State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis
title_fullStr State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis
title_full_unstemmed State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis
title_short State Foodborne Illness Surveillance and Response Laws: Compilation and Analysis
title_sort state foodborne illness surveillance and response laws: compilation and analysis
topic ISDS 2012 Conference Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692918/
work_keys_str_mv AT davidstephanie statefoodborneillnesssurveillanceandresponselawscompilationandanalysis
AT burtonjenna statefoodborneillnesssurveillanceandresponselawscompilationandanalysis
AT chadwickchris statefoodborneillnesssurveillanceandresponselawscompilationandanalysis
AT katzrebecca statefoodborneillnesssurveillanceandresponselawscompilationandanalysis