Cargando…

The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care. DESIGN: A computerised systematic literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they reported original data (≥10 cases) pertinent to malpractice claims, were based in prim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, E, Lowry, J, Smith, S M, Fahey, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002929
_version_ 1782274721947058176
author Wallace, E
Lowry, J
Smith, S M
Fahey, T
author_facet Wallace, E
Lowry, J
Smith, S M
Fahey, T
author_sort Wallace, E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care. DESIGN: A computerised systematic literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they reported original data (≥10 cases) pertinent to malpractice claims, were based in primary care and were published in the English language. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Malpractice claimants. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Malpractice claim (defined as a written demand for compensation for medical injury). We recorded: medical misadventure cited in claims, missed/delayed diagnoses cited in claims, outcome of claims, prevalence of claims and compensation awarded to claimants. RESULTS: Of the 7152 articles retrieved by electronic search, a total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative analysis. Twenty-eight studies presented data from medical indemnity malpractice claims databases and six studies presented survey data. Fifteen studies were based in the USA, nine in the UK, seven in Australia, one in Canada and two in France. The commonest medical misadventure resulting in claims was failure to or delay in diagnosis, which represented 26–63% of all claims across included studies. Common missed or delayed diagnoses included cancer and myocardial infarction in adults and meningitis in children. Medication error represented the second commonest domain representing 5.6–20% of all claims across included studies. The prevalence of malpractice claims in primary care varied across countries. In the USA and Australia when compared with other clinical disciplines, general practice ranked in the top five specialties accounting for the most claims, representing 7.6–20% of all claims. However, the majority of claims were successfully defended. CONCLUSIONS: This review of malpractice claims in primary care highlights diagnosis and medication error as areas to be prioritised in developing educational strategies and risk management systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3693415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36934152013-06-26 The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review Wallace, E Lowry, J Smith, S M Fahey, T BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care. DESIGN: A computerised systematic literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they reported original data (≥10 cases) pertinent to malpractice claims, were based in primary care and were published in the English language. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Malpractice claimants. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Malpractice claim (defined as a written demand for compensation for medical injury). We recorded: medical misadventure cited in claims, missed/delayed diagnoses cited in claims, outcome of claims, prevalence of claims and compensation awarded to claimants. RESULTS: Of the 7152 articles retrieved by electronic search, a total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative analysis. Twenty-eight studies presented data from medical indemnity malpractice claims databases and six studies presented survey data. Fifteen studies were based in the USA, nine in the UK, seven in Australia, one in Canada and two in France. The commonest medical misadventure resulting in claims was failure to or delay in diagnosis, which represented 26–63% of all claims across included studies. Common missed or delayed diagnoses included cancer and myocardial infarction in adults and meningitis in children. Medication error represented the second commonest domain representing 5.6–20% of all claims across included studies. The prevalence of malpractice claims in primary care varied across countries. In the USA and Australia when compared with other clinical disciplines, general practice ranked in the top five specialties accounting for the most claims, representing 7.6–20% of all claims. However, the majority of claims were successfully defended. CONCLUSIONS: This review of malpractice claims in primary care highlights diagnosis and medication error as areas to be prioritised in developing educational strategies and risk management systems. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3693415/ /pubmed/23869100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002929 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Wallace, E
Lowry, J
Smith, S M
Fahey, T
The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
title The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
title_full The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
title_fullStr The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
title_short The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
title_sort epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002929
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacee theepidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT lowryj theepidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT smithsm theepidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT faheyt theepidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT wallacee epidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT lowryj epidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT smithsm epidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT faheyt epidemiologyofmalpracticeclaimsinprimarycareasystematicreview