Cargando…
Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301 |
_version_ | 1782274729509388288 |
---|---|
author | van den Bos, Ruud Jolles, Jolle W. Homberg, Judith R. |
author_facet | van den Bos, Ruud Jolles, Jolle W. Homberg, Judith R. |
author_sort | van den Bos, Ruud |
collection | PubMed |
description | Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the social environment affects decisions, both via social interactions (e.g., social learning, cooperation and competition) and social stress effects. Although everyone is aware of this social modulating role on daily life decisions, this has thus far only scarcely been investigated in human and animal studies. Furthermore, neuroscientific studies rarely discuss social influence on decision-making from a functional perspective such as done in behavioral ecology studies. Therefore, the first aim of this article is to review the available data of the influence of the social context on decision-making both from a causal and functional perspective, drawing on animal and human studies. Also, there is currently still a gap between decision-making in real life where influences of the social environment are extensive, and decision-making as measured in the laboratory, which is often done without any (deliberate) social influences. However, methods are being developed to bridge this gap. Therefore, the second aim of this review is to discuss these methods and ways in which this gap can be increasingly narrowed. We end this review by formulating future research questions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3693511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36935112013-06-26 Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review van den Bos, Ruud Jolles, Jolle W. Homberg, Judith R. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the social environment affects decisions, both via social interactions (e.g., social learning, cooperation and competition) and social stress effects. Although everyone is aware of this social modulating role on daily life decisions, this has thus far only scarcely been investigated in human and animal studies. Furthermore, neuroscientific studies rarely discuss social influence on decision-making from a functional perspective such as done in behavioral ecology studies. Therefore, the first aim of this article is to review the available data of the influence of the social context on decision-making both from a causal and functional perspective, drawing on animal and human studies. Also, there is currently still a gap between decision-making in real life where influences of the social environment are extensive, and decision-making as measured in the laboratory, which is often done without any (deliberate) social influences. However, methods are being developed to bridge this gap. Therefore, the second aim of this review is to discuss these methods and ways in which this gap can be increasingly narrowed. We end this review by formulating future research questions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3693511/ /pubmed/23805092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301 Text en Copyright © 2013 van den Bos, Jolles and Homberg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience van den Bos, Ruud Jolles, Jolle W. Homberg, Judith R. Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
title | Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
title_full | Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
title_fullStr | Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
title_full_unstemmed | Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
title_short | Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
title_sort | social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbosruud socialmodulationofdecisionmakingacrossspeciesreview AT jollesjollew socialmodulationofdecisionmakingacrossspeciesreview AT hombergjudithr socialmodulationofdecisionmakingacrossspeciesreview |