Cargando…

Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review

Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Bos, Ruud, Jolles, Jolle W., Homberg, Judith R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301
_version_ 1782274729509388288
author van den Bos, Ruud
Jolles, Jolle W.
Homberg, Judith R.
author_facet van den Bos, Ruud
Jolles, Jolle W.
Homberg, Judith R.
author_sort van den Bos, Ruud
collection PubMed
description Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the social environment affects decisions, both via social interactions (e.g., social learning, cooperation and competition) and social stress effects. Although everyone is aware of this social modulating role on daily life decisions, this has thus far only scarcely been investigated in human and animal studies. Furthermore, neuroscientific studies rarely discuss social influence on decision-making from a functional perspective such as done in behavioral ecology studies. Therefore, the first aim of this article is to review the available data of the influence of the social context on decision-making both from a causal and functional perspective, drawing on animal and human studies. Also, there is currently still a gap between decision-making in real life where influences of the social environment are extensive, and decision-making as measured in the laboratory, which is often done without any (deliberate) social influences. However, methods are being developed to bridge this gap. Therefore, the second aim of this review is to discuss these methods and ways in which this gap can be increasingly narrowed. We end this review by formulating future research questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3693511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36935112013-06-26 Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review van den Bos, Ruud Jolles, Jolle W. Homberg, Judith R. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the social environment affects decisions, both via social interactions (e.g., social learning, cooperation and competition) and social stress effects. Although everyone is aware of this social modulating role on daily life decisions, this has thus far only scarcely been investigated in human and animal studies. Furthermore, neuroscientific studies rarely discuss social influence on decision-making from a functional perspective such as done in behavioral ecology studies. Therefore, the first aim of this article is to review the available data of the influence of the social context on decision-making both from a causal and functional perspective, drawing on animal and human studies. Also, there is currently still a gap between decision-making in real life where influences of the social environment are extensive, and decision-making as measured in the laboratory, which is often done without any (deliberate) social influences. However, methods are being developed to bridge this gap. Therefore, the second aim of this review is to discuss these methods and ways in which this gap can be increasingly narrowed. We end this review by formulating future research questions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3693511/ /pubmed/23805092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301 Text en Copyright © 2013 van den Bos, Jolles and Homberg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
van den Bos, Ruud
Jolles, Jolle W.
Homberg, Judith R.
Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
title Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
title_full Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
title_fullStr Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
title_full_unstemmed Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
title_short Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
title_sort social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbosruud socialmodulationofdecisionmakingacrossspeciesreview
AT jollesjollew socialmodulationofdecisionmakingacrossspeciesreview
AT hombergjudithr socialmodulationofdecisionmakingacrossspeciesreview